| Toolbox |
|---|
| This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because this article represents an idea of society before certain medical discoveries such as certain viewed articles.
Thanks, 2550 69 11hne (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- @2550 69 11hne I think this is fair. I acknowledge the contentious nature of pseudoscience. For the record, I will say I am not treating the topic as factual but just consolidating the sources into a retrospective on an outdated and obscure historical fad. I am open to criticism, perhaps if anyone thinks the article's written in a way that is biased in favor of the practice being described. -- Alexander Patmos (talk) 17:13, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- @2550 69 11hne (and others) I draftified this article for being composed of insufficiently reviewed LLM generated text. See the draft talk page for an example. I think this renders the peer review request invalid at this time. If this article is pushed back to mainspace I will notify you so the peer review can be re-requested. Sorry for the inconvenience! NicheSports (talk) 02:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)