2550 69 11hne

I think I should start a talk page

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello 2550 69 11hne! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:21, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi there 2550 69 11hne! I've restored this content, as it is under a compatible Creative Commons licence (CC-BY-3.0). In future, when you copy compatibly licensed text, please use a template like {{Creative Commons text attribution notice}} to provide attribution. You can see me doing so in this edit. MCE89 (talk) 06:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! 2550 69 11hne (talk) 12:22, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

It got reverted (not by me) under a Creative Commons license, and I wasn't able to paraphrase except for the grammar. 2550 69 11hne (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Wrong person for second reply 2550 69 11hne (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

It got reverted (not by me) under a Creative Commons license, and I wasn't able to paraphrase except for the grammar. 2550 69 11hne (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of I am making an article redirect 2727273737

A tag has been placed on I am making an article redirect 2727273737, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 204.111.137.20 (talk) 15:48, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Creating Redirects

Hello, 2550 69 11hne,

We frequently see a pattern of some newer editors going a little crazy once they discover they can create redirect pages where they start making dozens and dozens of redirects, sometimes for very flimsy reasons like a typo or misspelling. When this starts getting really bad to the point where other editors notice, the editor gets called to WP:ANI and it often ends with the editor receiving a topic ban from creating pages and sometimes even a block from editing in the main space of the project. I just say this now, not because you are at this point but I see you moving into creating some redirects and please keep the bar high on what should be a redirect and do not fall into the trap of creating a redirect for each typo of a term you can come up with. This is not a good enough reason for creating a redirect page and if you want to refresh your knowledge here, review Wikipedia:Redirect#Purposes of redirects. Actually, there is a lot of good information on Wikipedia:Redirect that would be helpful to remind oneself about.

Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suction, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Push and Pull. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

168 (number)

added a link pointing to 105

36 (number)

added a link pointing to Menorah

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Mariana Trench, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Day Creature (talk) 19:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jim Wigginton

The article Jim Wigginton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edwardx (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Assessment

Hi there. Please review your recent edits. I have had to revert some of them, because they broke the template formatting. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: I trouted myself 2550 69 11hne (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Your modification [summary] at “IP Addresses Are Not People” is nonsensical.

wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:IP_addresses_are_not_people&diff=prev&oldid=1320554971&diffonly=1 does not contain a descriptive modification summary, nor is the modification sensical, because IP addresses remain able to authenticate. Tag me if you are responding to my content or wish to notify me, because I may not be subscribed. (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello 2550 69 11hne! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Please review h11qq11, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Stop draftifying old articles

WP:DRAFTNO forbids ALL draftifications after the article is 90 days old. Stop immediately. You may be blocked from moving pages and draftifying articles if you continue. Sennecaster (Chat) 16:20, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Mariana Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Underwater volcano.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Associations

What did you mean by “Associations” when you used it here as a (sub)section heading? ~2025-35226-31 (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

It was because I needed another section for the article due to an issue with the lead. I tried to summarize the potential section.2550 69 11hne (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

What are you up to?

Can I ask why you created 1.73205...? I have deleted it. It was previously deleted, after creation by a now-blocked user, User:FaroeFO. I would ask you to not create improbable redirects, especially those which have been deleted after a discussion. TeaDrinker (talk) 20:11, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

I tried making redirects to pages like √3, with some possible search terms. 2550 69 11hne (talk) 20:23, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

I see you have made a number of redirects. The terms you have created do not seem at all likely. Please stop. --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:01, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

ok 2550 69 11hne (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

"3^0.5" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 3^0.5 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 2 § 3^0.5 until a consensus is reached. Chrisahn (talk) 13:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

"Greatest non-radioactive difference" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Greatest non-radioactive difference has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 2 § Greatest non-radioactive difference until a consensus is reached. Chrisahn (talk) 14:04, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

"1st antiderivative of position" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 1st antiderivative of position has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 2 § 1st antiderivative of position until a consensus is reached. Chrisahn (talk) 14:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

"1st integral of position" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 1st integral of position has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 2 § 1st integral of position until a consensus is reached. Chrisahn (talk) 14:12, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

"-1st derivative of position" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect -1st derivative of position has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 2 § -1st derivative of position until a consensus is reached. Chrisahn (talk) 14:13, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Block notice

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

@Ponyo: I am not WikiPro10! Get a check user! 2550 69 11hne (talk) 00:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

..... You are, use the check user tool. 2550 69 11hne (talk) 00:43, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

@Ponyo: I have no affiliation with WikiPro10 even though we apparently both have user boxes and the same ip address. I don't. Also my articles and redirects were created before my block.

Unblock please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2550 69 11hne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I have no affiliation with WikiPro10, he was shown to be a 22 year old male per userpage before he was blocked. I am an under 20 female. I have 4 dynamic ipv6 addresses, all starting with "2601", and it switches to an ipv4 address starting with "97" during the weekdays between 9am and 3pm, sometimes even to 5pm. (An exception is in certain days of the year, such such as mid December-January and Mid May-early August) The userpage and contributions connection is also due to the fact that we both like to be crazy in the user pages and sandbox. It's quite common with users. WikiPro10 quit wikipedia and moved to fandom, not making any useful contributions. In my user page, I noted certain interests and abilities, not shown with WikiPro10. I never even knew about WikiPro10 before the block. 2550 69 11hne (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You say "get a check user"; Ponyo is a CheckUser and you were blocked due to CU evidence. Also I find it curious here where you appear to be replying to yourself as if you were a different user. Regardless you were checkuser-blocked; while it is true that  CheckUser is not magic pixie dust you will need to provide much more convincing evidence than "I am not them" to overturn that. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@The Bushranger: I was not, I was just realizing he was the check user. After that, I then found out WikiPro 10 had a {{checkuser-block tag. I did not know he was the check user before the I checked it. 2550 69 11hne (talk) 16:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Kelburn Viaduct moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kelburn Viaduct. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 13:24, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kelburn Viaduct

Hello, 2550 69 11hne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kelburn Viaduct, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 6 June 2026 (UTC)