Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Turkey/archive1

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Support.--Absar 11:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this is a nomination would the nominator write why this can be a FP, does it meet the criteria and write their reason(s) for nominating the article. feydey 14:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - does not meet the criteria. Shyam ^(T/C) 20:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. This isn't even getting close.
- No image credits, and a rather stubby image prose.
- No suggestion pages.
- The news section is a mess and requires a rewrite.
- The "Selected article" section goes by far more than just summarizing the topic.
- Image frames.
- "Things to do" not formatted properly.
- "Other portals" section is empty.
- Excessive images and quotes at the intruduction.
I don't feel that there is any need to go on, please withdraw this and refer to portal peer review instead. Michaelas10 (Talk) 11:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.