Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Barbie (film)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC) .[reply]
List of accolades received by Barbie (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk and Sgubaldo (talk) 08:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Barbie is a 2023 fantasy comedy film directed by Greta Gerwig from a screenplay she wrote with Noah Baumbach. Based on the eponymous fashion dolls by Mattel, film stars Margot Robbie as the titular character and Ryan Gosling as Ken, and follows the duo on a journey of self-discovery after the former experiences an existential crisis. This is my eleventh film accolades list to be nominated for featured list status, and I largely based the format off of the accolades lists for The Artist, The Big Short, CODA, Dune, Dunkirk, If Beale Street Could Talk, 1917, Oppenheimer, The Shape of Water, and Slumdog Millionaire. Note I added Sgubaldo as a co-nominator since he provided significant contributions into improving this list. Birdienest81talk 08:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
edit- I would suggest that "as well as the highest-grossing release in Warner Bros. Pictures history" should be "and the highest-grossing release in Warner Bros. Pictures history"
- "received eight nominations for eight Academy Awards," - pretty sure one of the two "eight"s here is redundant
- "Its accompanying soundtrack album and score were further recognised" - US film so US spelling should be used ("recognized")
- "where it won the inaugural Cinematic and Box Office Achievement award" => "winning the inaugural Cinematic and Box Office Achievement award"
- The film's title should be linked each time it appears like in the table, like the other nominees
- None of the footnotes other than b are complete sentences so they should not have full stops
- That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Done - I have read all your comments and have made corrections and changes based off of them. Can you also review 55th Academy Awards for featured list consideration, as well.
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Drive-by comment
editThere is something screwy with the Ref. header on the table. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:08, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bgsu98: Done - I fixed the error on the ref header. Apparently, there was an extra left bracket that made it appear as an extra bracket in the header. I removed it, and now it should be fine. ::--Birdienest81talk 06:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
History6042
edit- A table header is needed.
- A few archives are missing.
- One of the header templated is weird.
- If it is not a whole sentence it shouldn't have a period, this in in the notes.
- Why is Barbie in the table not linked?
- Note H should have a "(2023)"
Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @History6042: Done - I have read all your comments and have made corrections and changes based off of them.
Harushiga
edit- "Produced on a budget of $128–145 million,[11][12]Barbie" - missing space
- The Global Icon & Creator Tribute portion of the Gotham Awards has no source.
- The ceremony date for the Cinema for Peace Awards doesn't sort properly.
- Use
|script-title=ja:for the original titles of Japanese refs. - Ref 21 - link to Deadline Hollywood
- Ref 39, 44, 105 & 106 - add translations
- Ref 78 - link to IndieWire
- Ref 97 - add translation, add
|language=ja, link to Nikkan Sports - Ref 111 - link to The Hollywood Reporter
- Ref 134 & 135 - add translations, add
|language=cs, link to Žebřík Music Awards in website parameter - Some consistency issues:
- Ref 21 & 95 use Deadline while the rest use Deadline Hollywood
- Ref 65 has Penske Media Corporation as the publisher while other Variety sources do not.
- Ref 111, 112 & 113 use
|author=while the rest use|last=and|first=. - Some ref sections with two citations use line breaks while others do not. Harushiga (talk) 15:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Harushiga: Done - I have addressed all your comments by making corrections you suggested.
Medxvo
edit- "the United States, the United Kingdom and most other territories" - I suggest adding a comma before "and" for consistency with other similar incidents
- "performances, music and production values" - same here, I think
- "for its direction and screenplay, performances, music" - why not "for its direction, screenplay, performances, music"?
- "Barbie received a leading nine nominations at the 81st Golden Globe Awards" - I think a source is usually added here to confirm that a film received the most nominations because the table alone can't confirm that
I think that's all, everything else looks great to me! Medxvo (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Medxvo: Done - I have read your comments and have made corrections and revisions based on them. Thank you for your feedback.
- --Birdienest81talk 11:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Happy to support. Medxvo (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Vestrina24Bio
edit@Birdienest81: as of this rev
- According to link-dispenser,
- 3 refs need archive urls.
- Fixed
- MOS:FILMACCOLADES says,
Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability.
- Advanced Imaging Society Awards, EDA Awards, Tribute to the Crafts, Georgia Film Critics Association Awards, ICG Publicists Awards, Kansas City Film Critics Circle Awards, and SCL Awards - should be removed unless there's a reason for inclusion.festival awards should be added with discretion, with inclusion subject to consensus.
- Capri Hollywood International Film Festival, Palm Springs International Film Festival and Santa Barbara International Film Festival - were there any consensus for inclusion..?Avoid accolades, especially listicles, that are mentioned only by the recipient and the awarding body.
- Kansas City Film Critics Circle, African-American Film Critics Association, Dublin Film Critics Circle, IndieWire Critics Poll, and Žebřík Music Awards - ?
- Just "Best Edited Feature Film – Comedy" is enough for category in ACE Awards.
- Fixed
- Just "The Most Valuable Film of the Year 2024" is enough for category in Cinema for Peace Awards.
- Fixed
- Ref 22 only covers AARP noms, add a source for win.
- Fixed
- Ref 35 only covers Astra Film Awards, add a source for Astra Film Creative Arts Awards win.
- see below
- Ref 122 only covers Seattle Film Critics Society Awards nom, add a source for wins.
- Fixed
- Add tanslated titles to refs 40, 45, 99, 107, 108, 136 and 137.
- Fixed
- Add refs to notes as well.
- Replace WP:PRIMARY sources (refs 28, 36, 37, 44, 45, 52, 56, 57, 63, 74, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85, 86, 91, 100, 101, 109, 110, 111, 131 and 133) with WP:INDEPENDENT sources wherever possible.
- Link work/publisher in ref 18 and 113.
- Fixed
Vestrian24Bio 13:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Vestrian24Bio: I'm almost done addressing your comments. However I do have some points of contention:
- The citation backing up Dublin Film Critics Circle is using an article from RTÉ which is a network similar to BBC, ABC, or PBS. Therefore doesn't this mean the source is separate from the organization and does not violate WP:PRIMARY and WP:INDEPENDENT?
- For Capri Hollywood International Film Festival, Palm Springs International Film Festival, and Santa Barbara International Film Festival, I'm assuming there must have been some sort of consensus to include them since they are also included in other film accolades lists that were promoted to featured list status such as Oppenheimer, Parasite, and Joker
- The Hollywood Reporter article listing all the winners of the Astra Film Awards 2024 also does include winners from the Creative Arts Awards categories. I checked the reference (ref 35), and while there is no mention of the words "Creative Arts", it does mention the winners of the categories handed out at the Creative Arts ceremony (i.e. Casting, Original Song, Hair and Make-Up, etc.
- The articles being used as sources for the Houston Film Critics Society Awards are from the Houston Chronicle, which is the daily newspaper serving the Houston area. There it is separate from the Houston Film Critics Society.
- As for the sources you wanted WP:Independent, unfortunately, most of the sources you listed don't have secondary sources that would be considered reliable. I know there are some that cite Matt Neglia's Next Best Picture website or Erik Andersen's Awards Watch. However, I am not so sure those two sources have been vetted as WP:Reliable Sources. And of course, I know that reliable sources take precedence over independent and secondary sources. I wonder what SNUGGUMS would think of "Next Best Picture" or "AwardsWatch" since if I'm honest to you, those seem like blogs rather than some kind of vetted news source. Otherwise, if I can't use the actual organization as a citation, does this mean I have to remove the awards since essentially they are only mentioned in reliable sources by the awarding body and no one else that it independently reliable since they are essential "listicles"?
- --Birdienest81talk 07:34, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Birdienest81: as for Kansas City Film Critics Circle, African-American Film Critics Association, and Žebřík Music Awards - I'm afraid that's the case. Others seem fine. Vestrian24Bio 13:38, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Vestrian24Bio: Done - I have addressed all your comments and made adjustments based off of them. I removed the references using NextBestPicture and AwardsWatch with either the award organization itself or for the latter, using MUBI which is a streaming service dedicated to show films and keeps a database similar to that of TV Guide and Turner Classic Movies. Everything else should be using secondary sources unless there is no secondary source that has been vetted (or looks to be legit) based WP:RS. I also removed Kansas City Film Critics Circle, African-American Film Critics Association, and Žebřík Music Awards per your comments.
- @Birdienest81: as for Kansas City Film Critics Circle, African-American Film Critics Association, and Žebřík Music Awards - I'm afraid that's the case. Others seem fine. Vestrian24Bio 13:38, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- --Birdienest81talk 07:34, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Re-pinging Vestrian24Bio as a courtesy. --PresN 22:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- All good, then Support. Vestrian24Bio 16:22, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:16, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.