~2026-27466-54
Welcome!
editHello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
You are welcome to edit without logging in; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages and upload media).
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
If you have any questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!
Happy editing! BSH (talk) - (she/her) 18:51, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
edit
Hello, I'm Augmented Seventh. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sharknado: The 4th Awakens, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Augmented Seventh (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello! I'm Doniago. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Ocean's Eleven have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Cadillacs and Dinosaurs (video game) did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
or in the visual editor:
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. If you use a registered account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Editor →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! Waxworker (talk) 18:24, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cadillacs and Dinosaurs (role-playing game). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sciencefish (talk) 21:02, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
A section with only one line of text does not need two section headings. (diff)
You have been making bad edits like this literally for years and it is just going to get you banned again, the pattern is obvious. No good faith editor would do this, after being asked to stop once. The fact that you keep doing this shows either complete lack of understanding of WP:OVERSECTION or malice.
Just stop. -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 17:36, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Section order
editMOS:FILM states
There is no defined order of the sections
Your personal preference "in right order"(diff) is not policy no matter how persistently you force it on articles and edit war over layout.
Forcing "Home media" as a subheading under "Release" still fails WP:OVERSECTION.
This is a waste of time and beyond bad faith. I would ask a normal editor to try adding content supported by reliable source instead of messing about with layout and section ordering, but after years of refusing to understand a simple policy it is clear the admins blocking you again is the only correct response. -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 22:00, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Masters of the Universe (1987 film), you may be blocked from editing. Hamimh2 (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Masters of the Universe (1987 film). Hamimh2 (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- See my warnings above. This editor has been rearranging section headings and ignoring WP:OVERSECTION literally for years. He persistently forces his preferred version on articles. Reports and blocks slows him down temporarily, but they do slow him down. -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- I have to report and block you because you are ruining my perfect work and doing things your own way. Stop ruining my edits. ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:06, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- There was someone like you who followed me and ruined my edits, but they blocked him sooner or later, they will block you too because you think you are very right, but you don't understand anything. ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:07, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- and to emphasize that I do not commit vandalism, I am improving an article, but there will always be someone who has decided that I should undo my edits, this is not fair play, I would admit it if I committed vandalism, but in this case I am innocent ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- You persistently fail to follow even the WP:SIMPLE rules and explain your edits with a meaningful edit summary.
- You are frequently reverted by many different editors. You are told your edits are not constructive but you come back and make the same changes over and over again. The warnings on this page alone should be enough to make that clear to any administrator.
- WP:OVERSECTION has been explained to you repeatedly but you ignore it. There is absolutely no need to add two section headings to one line of text.
- MOS:FILM clearly states
There is no defined order of the sections
yet you persist in rearranging articles without any explanation, forcing your own preferred order with no explanation or reason. - To the best of my knowledge I have not been banned, I have been editing in good faith and following the rules as best I can. I would be happy to discuss with Administrators. -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 20:27, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- I also think I follow the rules, but as always I end up being guilty, and the fact that there are no rules for sections is not well thought out because Home media is a sub-section of main section release in this main section release have more sections like Marketing, Theatrical and more... ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
I also think I follow the rules
you do not, you have been told that you are not following the rules, and you have been asked to change many times but you soon go back to doing the same things over and over again.but as always I end up being guilty
you keep getting in trouble, but you insist your are right and refuse to change. I do not think you understand your own cognitive dissonance.- If article or section is bigger then it might sense to split sections into subheadings. It does not make sense to subdivide short section headings, but you persistently apply the same unnecessary section headings to very short section regardless if they are needed or not.
- This has all be explained before but the anon editor never listens, I explain this for the administrators in the unlikely event he follows up his threat to report me. (A relatively recent example was Talk:Predator:_Badlands#Revert_WP:OVERSECTION_and_please_keep_reverting_it.) -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 20:43, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- here is right sequels is not part from Other media main section is part from Franchise main section with spin-off prequel and crossover ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:47, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- In other media is a video games, novels, comics... ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:51, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- here is right sequels is not part from Other media main section is part from Franchise main section with spin-off prequel and crossover ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:47, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- I also think I follow the rules, but as always I end up being guilty, and the fact that there are no rules for sections is not well thought out because Home media is a sub-section of main section release in this main section release have more sections like Marketing, Theatrical and more... ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- and to emphasize that I do not commit vandalism, I am improving an article, but there will always be someone who has decided that I should undo my edits, this is not fair play, I would admit it if I committed vandalism, but in this case I am innocent ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- There was someone like you who followed me and ruined my edits, but they blocked him sooner or later, they will block you too because you think you are very right, but you don't understand anything. ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:07, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- I have to report and block you because you are ruining my perfect work and doing things your own way. Stop ruining my edits. ~2026-27466-54 (talk) 20:06, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
Despite threatenting to report me the anon IP editor never did because he knows he has failed to follow the rules before and been sanctioned for it repeatedly many times. As if the years of doing this wasn't already obvious, it is again clear that the above anon IP editor is doing the same edits again from another ip address (diff).
No lessons have been learned. Despite being reverted by multiple different editors the anon ip keeps moving to new accounts and trying to impose their own preferred article organizations without any explanation and without any apparent need to rearrange articles. -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 23:50, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- He'll be back at it from ipv6 accounts again soon probably he got away with it before. -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 23:45, 17 June 2026 (UTC)