Doniago

DRN Case Status

Case		Created		Last volunteer edit		Last modified
Title	Status	User	Time	User	Time	User	Time
2025 Africa Cup of Nations	In Progress	DimaMaghrib34 (t)	22 days, 6 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	5 days, 7 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	5 days, 7 hours
Imran Khan	In Progress	Burrobert (t)	13 days, 14 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	1 days, 5 hours	SheriffIsInTown (t)	4 hours
Federal subjects of Russia	In Progress	PharaohCrab (t)	11 days, 23 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	1 days, 5 hours	PharaohCrab (t)	10 hours
Olongapo	Closed	Kyleoahso (t)	5 days, 17 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	1 days, 21 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	1 days, 21 hours

If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.

Re: Jeff Stryker Talk page comment removal — explanation per WP:BLP

Hello Doniago. Thank you for your message regarding the Jeff Stryker Talk page.

I am Charles Casper Peyton (User:Charlescpeyton), the subject of the Jeff Stryker article. I removed a comment from the Talk page and wish to explain my reasoning clearly and in good faith.

The comment I removed stated that I was married to a named private individual. I removed it for the following policy-based reasons:

• The comment was entirely

 unsourced — no reliable published 
 source was cited in support of 
 the claim

• It concerned my private marital

 status, which I have never 
 publicly confirmed and which 
 I maintain as entirely private

• It named a private individual

 in connection with me without 
 their consent

• WP:BLPTALK states that

 Talk pages must not contain 
 material that would be 
 inappropriate in the article 
 itself — an unsourced claim 
 about a living person's private 
 marital status would clearly 
 not belong in the article

I acknowledge that Talk page comments should generally be preserved and I understand why my removal triggered your concern. However I believe WP:BLP and WP:BLPTALK support the removal of unsourced contentious material about private personal matters even from Talk pages.

I am committed to editing this article constructively and in full compliance with Wikipedia policies. I have disclosed my conflict of interest at User:Charlescpeyton and am working to improve the article with properly cited sources.

I welcome any guidance you can offer and am happy to discuss further if needed.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Charles Casper Peyton (User:Charlescpeyton) Charlescpeyton (talk) 16:14, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Fair enough. However, with regards to editing the article itself, I will maintain that while it's likely okay for you to make minor edits, any substantial changes are best made by you requesting an edit on the Talk page that's then implemented (or not) by editors who do not share your COI. You may want to try to keep your requests fairly simple and compartmentalized; the easier it is for other editors to figure out what you'd like changed, the faster the changes are likely to get made. In other words, requesting the addition of a single sentence is likely to go faster than requesting the addition of five paragraphs. Which isn't to say you can't ultimately make all of the requests you feel are necessary to improve the article; I'm speaking from a standpoint of what may be the most productive approach you can take.

Assuming you really are who you say you are (no offense intended; editors have few ways to be sure that other editors really are who they claim they are), I suppose it would be cliched for me to claim I was a big fan, heh.

Sorry if you got a level of pushback here that may have made you feel unwelcome. Unfortunately there's a significant history of editors with conflicts of interest trying to edit their own articles in their own flagrant self-interest, so we have policies to try to prevent that, and experienced editors can come off as a bit dubious of editors claiming to be celebrities. DonIago (talk) 16:23, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Re: Jeff Stryker Talk page — COI and trademark clarification

Hello Doniago. Thank you for your guidance regarding WP:COIEDIT.

I have reviewed the policy and wish to respond respectfully and in good faith.

I am Charles Casper Peyton (User:Charlescpeyton), the subject of the Jeff Stryker article and the registered trademark holder of Jeff Stryker™ — a United States trademark active since 1986. Jeff Stryker is not only my professional name but a registered commercial brand that I own, control, and license exclusively. This gives me unique authoritative firsthand knowledge of the brand's commercial history that no other editor can fully verify from published sources alone.

I understand and accept that Wikipedia does not grant editorial control on the basis of trademark ownership, and I am not claiming such control. Going forward I will use the Talk page to propose significant changes and invite neutral editors to implement them, reserving direct edits only for clear WP:BLP violations requiring immediate action.

Regarding the Talk page comment I removed — it stated I was married to a named private individual. I removed it because it was entirely unsourced, concerned my private marital status which I have never publicly confirmed, named a private individual without consent, and directly violated WP:BLPTALK which prohibits Talk page content that would be inappropriate in the article itself. I believe this removal was correct under Wikipedia policy though I acknowledge I should have left an explanatory note rather than removing silently.

I have disclosed my conflict of interest fully at User:Charlescpeyton and am committed to working constructively within Wikipedia's guidelines.

I welcome any further guidance you can offer.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Charles Casper Peyton (User:Charlescpeyton) Charlescpeyton (talk) 16:25, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Charles; I think my response to the earlier thread covered everything I have for advice to offer at this time. The biggest issue is that as an editor with a COI you shouldn't make substantial edits to the article about you, but rather request them via the Talk page. You seem to understand that at this point, which is awesome, and I (and I'm sure other editors) appreciate you being candid about your conflict of interest.

Happy to try to help if you have any specific questions/concerns unrelated to specific edits to the article in question. DonIago (talk) 16:56, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

You win. I'm out. Congratulations. 3charles3 (talk) 06:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
22		The Way Things Work (TV series) (talk)	Add sources
19		Red Army (novel) (talk)	Add sources
80		The Gospel of John (2003 film) (talk)	Add sources
294		Rupert (TV series) (talk)	Add sources
58		Maugrim (talk)	Add sources
302		Mr. Tumnus (talk)	Add sources
831		Alice Krige (talk)	Cleanup
110		Wendy Torrance (talk)	Cleanup
66		Out of the Unknown (talk)	Cleanup
90		Riding the Bullet (film) (talk)	Expand
439		Soviet Armed Forces (talk)	Expand
195		Edmund Pevensie (talk)	Expand
227		Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
86		The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (1979 film) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,024		Bob the Builder (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
373		Particle (talk)	Merge
3		Jacksonville Expressway Authority (talk)	Merge
206		AZP S-60 (talk)	Merge
59		Semyon Krivoshein (talk)	Wikify
142		Fix-up (talk)	Wikify
96		Grigory Kulik (talk)	Wikify
3		Christine Reid (talk)	Orphan
2		CVN45502 (talk)	Orphan
8		Ashraf Garda (talk)	Orphan
8		The Conrad Boys (talk)	Stub
12		Fire Song (talk)	Stub
73		234th Guards Air Assault Regiment (talk)	Stub
60		Skellington Productions (talk)	Stub
210		Josh Friedman (talk)	Stub
40		Allison Abbate (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Horton Hears a Who! (film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Horton Hears a Who! (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:55, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Bronx Zoo Update

The Bronx Zoo now has panther chameleons in the Madagascar! exhibit! And the vasa parrots are lesser, not greater. And the pygmy marmosets at the Congo Gorilla Forest have been removed permanently. ~2026-30456-85 (talk) 14:51, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you're telling me this? I haven't edited the article since April. DonIago (talk) 14:55, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Last Emperor Edit

Hi,

Roger Ebert's review talks about the ending. There is also an unsourced mention of the scene in the Plot section of the page. I'll go through and add a few more inline citations there as well. Sorry about not sourcing my earlier edit (and forgetting to sign in). Question, on a film page page, can you reference the film itself with a timestamp maybe? On book pages, you can reference the book, especially when it comes to specific quotes and plot, but I'm less familiar with film. —Zujine|talk 18:38, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

You shouldn't need to add references to the plot per WP:FILMPLOT. The film itself should be sufficient sourcing, as long as the plot section isn't making any claims that aren't evident from the film itself.

I don't see why you couldn't reference the film with a timestamp using Template:Cite AV media, though I'm not sure what your intentions are/why you feel you'd need to? DonIago (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the insight. I was asking about citing the film directly because at first I had trouble finding a source that talked about the ending in order to cite my earlier edit about the setting appearing again at the end. It was just a general inquiry in case I found myself wanting to add something to a film page where I can't find a third-party source that addresses something shown in the film. I appreciate you taking the time to reply. Thanks again. —Zujine|talk 17:13, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Removal of suicide warning

Requested information on why my warning on the suicide page was removed 9yasono (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Whether or not to include that kind of content has been discussed extensively enough in the past that there's a notice about it on the Talk page for the article. Thus far the consensus has been not to do so. DonIago (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
389		Faisal I (talk)	Add sources
72		A Dangerous Man: Lawrence After Arabia (talk)	Add sources
1,052		Sykes–Picot Agreement (talk)	Add sources
140		Siege of Medina (talk)	Add sources
172		Robert Bolt (talk)	Add sources
67		Percy Cox (talk)	Add sources
37		Modern history of Saudi Arabia (talk)	Cleanup
22		Beneath You (talk)	Cleanup
2		D32 road (Croatia) (talk)	Cleanup
356		Aqaba (talk)	Expand
10		Timeline of Ottoman Syria history (talk)	Expand
6		1918 in British-administered Palestine (talk)	Expand
940		Baptism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6		Clola (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
265		Meles Zenawi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4		Ctenobethylus oblongiceps (talk)	Merge
214		Sukanta Bhattacharya (talk)	Merge
14		Thai QR Payment (talk)	Merge
100		Cold Case season 7 (talk)	Wikify
1		Colaspis recurva (talk)	Wikify
17		Battle of Otterlo (talk)	Wikify
2		Almaz Garifullin (talk)	Orphan
4		Christian A. Meissner (talk)	Orphan
2		Artem Iliukhin (talk)	Orphan
5		Lawrence After Arabia (talk)	Stub
11		Rosario Pisani (talk)	Stub
5		Muhammed Sharif al-Faruqi (talk)	Stub
84		Nafud desert (talk)	Stub
262		Tafas massacre (talk)	Stub
8		1879 Princeton Tigers football team (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:08, 1 June 2026 (UTC)