New topic

Archives:

archive 1

archive 2


Your submission at Articles for creation: Brachyaglaspis has been accepted

edit
Brachyaglaspis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brachyaglaspis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antennae. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your behavior in paleoart review

edit

Please stop posting useless reviews. Radiodonts that are fully reconstructed already have restorations, and those that are not don't need such images, meaning your images are highly unlikely to be useful. If you just want people to rate your own art, why not start on DeviantArt? This is a place where people can rate images that are helpful to articles, and you shouldn't get in the way of that by creating new and new unhelpful reviews. If you continue to behave like this, I will consider reporting. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 02:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Paleobiota of the Kinzers formation

edit

Information icon Hello, Zhenghecaris. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paleobiota of the Kinzers formation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Paleobiota of the Kinzers formation

edit

Hello, Zhenghecaris. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Paleobiota of the Kinzers formation".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply