User talk:Yarfpr/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Discord

I'm wondering if you ever thought about joining the Wikimedia Discord. More info at WP:DISCORD. –Fredddie™ 03:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Freddie! I didn't know about the existence of Wikimedia Discord. Although it catches my attention, I don't think I have the time to enter that platform as I would like. I really appreciate your interest. Yarfpr (talk) 02:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Yo soy Boricua, pa'que tu lo sepas!#References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yo_soy_Boricua,_pa%27que_tu_lo_sepas!

Hello Yarfpr I see that you were one of the last making changes to the page and today I saw some articles were missing from the page and added them. It looks like I might have had an issue with the format on the way it looks. If you could take a look.

Someone should maybe update with latest info from the song and look into making a wiki for Taino as the latest reference from U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in congress went into the congressional record and its an important historical point for Taino and his composition. I had no idea how to add this mention but here is the link to congress records. You can do a term search. Here to help if needed gathering more information. Thank You

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-168/issue-195/house-section/article/H9867-1?s=1&r=88

Cperez21 (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Cperez21! I don't know if I understood you correctly, but I would like to know what your doubt is as such. You don't know how to cite correctly? Do you want to write an article for Taíno? Do you want to mention that event in a specific section in Yo soy Boricua, pa'que tu lo sepas!?

I have looked at the article and citations 10, 11 and 12 are not mentioned within the prose. If your doubts are based on how to cite correctly, this article and this other one can help you better than I can.

Please don't hesitate to write to me. Greetings! Yarfpr (talk) 15:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

It was more on the format I saw that the font was not matching in numerical context. I will try to fix it.

I will also try to do an article on Taino is also now a days a blockchain entrepreneur. There is an article from El Nuevo Dia, I saw online will use for quote. Once I'm done I will see if I can send it to you in case you want to review it.

I will also try to fix the citations. Thank You Cperez21 (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello yarfpr I have successfully completed the wiki. It took me some time because I wanted to ensure it was completely accurate with the news sources and cited accordingly. I also left a comment for the update. The chatter after the representative of congress cited it brought some attention to the song so it was pivotal to ensure the page was accurate with the latest information.

Also Due to prior litigation I delved into the story, the documentary section was not relevant to the song. Everywhere I looked it had nothing to do with Bosch and it should not supersede the historical context of the song. Also do to copyright litigation that Bosch had it was best to ensure everything was matching to all proper news sources that covered it all.

I will try my best to work on a page for (Bosch) under the artist name Taino so that it has proper links back to the wiki now that I see there is good citations on him.

I will probably be working on other articles that I have seen that are interesting and need updates when I have time.

Thank You again Cperez21 (talk) 04:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

@Cperez21: Glad to see you corrected it! I think your ideas are excellent and I support them. I would like you to continue providing information on everything related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. You are always welcome to enter WP:PUR, where you can meet and collaborate with other Puerto Rican editors or those interested in our Caribbean archipelago. Saludos. Yarfpr (talk) 16:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

I was able to create Taino page but It's kind of tough when people remove hours of work that had proper citations instead of sending a comment to improve. pretty vicious experience that I have to get used too.

For example I had to add a legal section because I found citations from multiple sources and now is completely removed without clear context. They even changed the year of a release date. When I click undo to view what the issue was Im getting an error so Im trying to do my best. Doesn't seem people are too friendly like you have been.

Not everyone is as seasoned or holds same perspectives wikipedia editor. If you have any suggestion or improvements for the Taino page I would appreciate it

thank you Cperez21 (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

I understand what you are saying and you are absolutely right. Unfortunately, there are hostile people on WP and we have to deal with them all the time. In that WP is not so different from real life. The important thing is to learn from good and not-so-good experiences and try to enjoy your time in the encyclopedia, but you also have to familiarize yourself with the rules, many of which I'm still learning. Don't be discouraged. We've all been through some awkward moments. The most important thing is to maintain good communication with others and demonstrate your contributions with reliable sources. Mucho ánimo. Yarfpr (talk) 18:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello Yarfpr!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Beatriz, Caguas, Puerto Rico

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Beatriz, Caguas, Puerto Rico, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Bairoa, Caguas, Puerto Rico

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bairoa, Caguas, Puerto Rico, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2023

Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter

Features

• A New Future for Road Articles Online

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hey, I just wanted to mention if you could please use the edit summary. It's good practice to use the edit summary. See here for more WP:ES. It's because I have most of the PR articles on my watchlist and when you make an edit I normally have to go in to see what you did 'cause you don't add edit summaries. Cheers! The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi, The Eloquent Peasant! Thanks for reminding me of that detail. I really regret not using the edit summary regularly. Most of my edits are minor and that's why I rarely describe the type of changes I make. I only inform the type of edit if it is something very important to everyone. I promise you that I will use it at all times, even in irrelevant situations. Cheers! Yarfpr (talk) 15:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Manuel Pérez (teacher)

Please read and comment. Bearian (talk) 15:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

thanks

I appreciate your uploading all the photos of Puerto Rico to Wiki, but do you think maybe you could include the GPS coordinates of the images? Thanks.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 17:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, The Eloquent Peasant! How can coordinates be added? I've seen a template, but I'd like to know how to correctly identify the coordinates of the places where I've taken photos. Gracias. Yarfpr (talk) 18:20, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

If you are using your phone you can the privacy option in Settings. I think turning privacy to "off" would add the GPS coordinates to every photo you take. With privacy = off, the GPS coordinates would automatically be attached to the photo so you wouldn't have to add the location template. It would be added upon upload. Of course, when you want to take pics of private locations then you would change the setting back to Privacy "on". Thanks for considering it. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 19:07, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

@The Eloquent Peasant: Privacy is important to me, which is why I don't usually turn on the location of my photos. If I use Google Maps coordinates to add an approximate location, is that information enough to validate the location of my photos? For me, it's not a major inconvenience to add some coordinates, but I have hundreds of photos and it's going to be a bit complicated to add that information to all the images. For now, I would only add them to the images I've posted in articles related to barrios if the file name isn't precise enough. Saludos. Yarfpr (talk) 21:35, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

OK. No worries. Thanks again for your awesome photos! The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 03:33, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Palominos

Hi,

The correct spelling of the island off the coast of Fajardo is "Palominos", as this is how it appears in historical documents since the 19th century. It is also the spelling used by the Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales y NOAA.

In Puerto Rico, the "s" is often times not pronounced, which has given rise to the "Palomino” spelling, the most commonly used by the media and people, today.

To keep the page accurate, the page title uses “Palominos”, but the first sentence of its intro indicates that “Palomino” is most commonly used.

thanks! Tektonson (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Saludos, Tektonson. I would appreciate it if you could provide me with a link where I can verify that information. I have always known Palomino and Palominito in their singular form, but on the internet there are results that show both forms and for me it is important to clarify that doubt. For now I'll leave the article alone, but I need the information to correct the Wikidata item and its category on Commons. Gracias. Yarfpr (talk) 00:14, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the reference! Tektonson (talk) 08:54, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome, Tektonson. I found a great source on the article's talk page. It seems that someone else had the same question as me. I have already corrected the information in the article, on Commons and on Wikidata. Yarfpr (talk) 19:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

THANK YOU 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼 Tektonson (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day 2026 - BunnyBowl

Wikipedia Day 2026 - BunnyBowl
You are invited to Wikipedia Day 2026 - BunnyBowl, hosted by WikiLatinos with the support of the WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritage & WikiProject Latin music. Help us celebrate the 25th birthday of Wikipedia and the historic Superbowl performance of Bad Bunny! Together we will improve Wikipedia's coverage of Puerto Rican artists, cultural movements, and the social realities affecting our latino communities. You’re also welcome to join our WikiLatinos Discord channel to participate in the editing parties hosted during the contest.
Contests dates: From January 15 (Wikipedia Day) until February 8, 2026 (SuperBowl LX). All participants are subject to our Code of Conduct.

Oscar_. (talk) 14:31, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

I noticed that you have communicated with other editors in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments and edit summaries. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Mclay1 (talk) 07:09, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Puerto Rico is part of the US, obviously, and you've made Category:Neighborhoods in insular areas of the United States a subcategory of Category:Neighborhoods in the United States anyway. A completely pointless change that will likely be reversed at CfD. Please do not be rude in edit summaries and respect the consensus on categorising insular areas of the US as part of the US. Mclay1 (talk) 07:12, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Saludos, Mclay1. I apologize if it bothers you that I greet you in Spanish instead of English on my talk page. Leaving that aside, I thank you very much for writing to me here and for providing me with that information, some of which I already knew and some of which I will not take into consideration. As you may have noticed, the reason I created that category is not because I am contradicting myself, but because Puerto Rico belongs to the USA, but is not part of the USA. Having said that, the way you were categorizing the barrios category wasn't correct because the preposition "in" can have several nuances, including the geographical aspect, but also the political one.

The relationship between Puerto Rico and the USA is difficult to understand even for Puerto Ricans themselves, and that's why it's even more understandable that people outside of this reality are aware of the circumstances of this relationship. That doesn't mean you don't have the right to edit information about Puerto Rico; quite the contrary, but it must always be done with education, respect, and responsibility. If you feel that I acted arrogantly, I deeply regret my attitude, but for me it is more important to tell the truth and not go around misinforming people.

I hope this misunderstanding doesn't cause any friction between you and me because the last thing I want is to have enemies because of differences of points of view. I invite you to visit WP:PRUS if you still have any questions. Take care of yourself. Yarfpr (talk) 00:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Why do the guidelines for wikipedia not apply to the articles you own?

Answer that, and you're most of the way to figuring out why you've proven today to be such a horrible "editor".

• 17:57, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −948  Humatas, Añasco, Puerto Rico →Sectors: another mishmash Building/Apts. and intersections list. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 17:54, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −1,478  Calvache →Sectors: another mishmash Building/Apts. and intersections list. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 17:38, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −1,296  Hato Puerco Arriba →Sectors: another mishmash Building/Apts. and intersections list. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 17:32, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −1,183  Guaniquilla, Aguada, Puerto Rico →Sectors: another mishmash Building/Apts. and intersections list. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 17:28, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −1,428  Herreras →Sectors: another mishmash Building list. See WP:NOTDIRECTRY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 17:27, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −1,476  Santana, Arecibo, Puerto Rico →Sectors: another mishmash Building list. See WP:NOTDIRECTRY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 17:26, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −1,615  Villalba Abajo →Sectors: another mishmash list of inersections and apt. buidings. See WP:NOTDIRECTRY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 17:25, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −2,216  Florida Adentro, Florida, Puerto Rico →Sectors: another mishmash list. See WP:NOTDIRECTRY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 17:22, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −1,808  Guaynabo barrio-pueblo →Sectors: another mishmash Building list. See WP:NOTDIRECTRY and gain talk page consensus before adding back in Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 16:12, 6 June 2026 diff hist  −1,658  Bairoa, Caguas, Puerto Rico →Sectors and demographics: As stated before, : removed complete mishmash Directory of stores, apartment bulidings and unknown what else. Please gain a consensus on the talk page, problem editor, before adding the Walmart and other laundry list buildings back in. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

~2026-31521-88 (talk) 20:26, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Saludos, anónimo (~2026-31521-88). Primeramente te pido que tengas la confianza de crearte una cuenta reigstrada en lugar de editar artículos de forma anónima para que así se pueda desarrollar un ambiente más armonioso y de respeto. En segundo lugar, tus ediciones son vandálicas porque estás eliminando información que cuenta con las debidas citas y el respaldo de una comunidad que en todo este tiempo no ha tenido ninguna objeción para con ella. Así las cosas, eres tú quien debe darle explicaciones a los demás editores de por qué ese contenido debe ser eliminado. Y sí, esta es la Wikipedia en inglés, pero en mi página de discusión te escribo en mi idioma principal porque estoy en mi derecho, el mismo que tú te tomaste al eliminar deliberadamente toda esa información. Cuando quieras colaborar de forma apropiada con la comunidad, aquí me tienes para darte la mano si así lo deseas. Solamente recuerda que por menos que eso que has hecho han bloqueado a mucha gente.

Update: Para que no sigas pensando que soy tan "horrible", al menos te di la razón en eliminar las intersecciones innecesarias y algunos lugares que no son sectores, comunidades o urbanizaciones. También te validé la eliminación de toda información sin citar después de tanto tiempo, incliyendo los lugares que pueden ser percibidos como promociones. Buena suerte en tus ediciones. Yarfpr (talk) 20:34, 6 June 2026 (UTC)