Xzit49

Welcome!

Hi Xzit49! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 18:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ace China

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ace China, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your draft

Hello Xzit49. As promised, i have finally managed to read and make a couple of comments on your draft. I'll number them, maybe make it easier to follow:

1. My first and probably most important comment is one i think i mentioned before: I'm not sure what is is about this person which makes him notable enough for an article ~ everything about him seems very vague and nebulous: What is a real estate strategist, what does he do, why is it (and he) important?
2. Two or three of the references when i click on them go to 404 errors or non-useful pages on the relevant websites, so i can't verify what is written
3. The references i was able to get to and read seem (to me) largely promotional; i may be wrong (i am not a content expert by any means), but i suspect that they are not sufficient to establish Ace China's notability or to support an article about him which is not tainted with advertising
4. There are a couple of minor formatting points ~ the titles of newspapers in English are put in italics ~ like this: The Guardian, which you get like this ''The Guardian'' ~ rather than with asterisks are you have currently, and i suspect his birth name would normally be bolded in the opening sentence, too
5. You probably don't need phrases like "as reported by..." when you have the appropriate newspaper in the citation; it is understood that what we are doing is saying (in our own words) what they have reported, and our references prove it
6. It doesn't have to happen immediately, but i would think that there are a number of terms in the article that could be made into links to other articles

I hope that this response doesn't feel too negative to you; i'm certainly not trying to be that way or to discourage you, but i wouldn't be doing you any favours if i sugar-coated what i see as issues with the article. If you are convinced that my assessment of Ace China is wrong, that he is both notable and written about enough to support an article, i urge you to continue to develop it ~ i'm still happy to help or offer suggestions if you like ~ in your userspace before offering it as an article. In the meantime, i also suggest that you try small edits elsewhere in the encyclopaedia, to see how we do things and to get the hang of it and to begin to feel like a full member of the community (i know it took me several months and several score edits before i felt i "properly belonged") ~ Lindsay^Hello 09:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multilord (May 16)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Mcmatter, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

• evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Multilord to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:19, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Xzit49! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 18:19, 16 May 2026 (UTC)