WikiEditor451

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, WikiEditor451! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Article development
• Help desk

If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 〜 Adflatuss • talk 12:34, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi WikiEditor451. Thank you for your work on Antonio Zeoli. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources to establish WP:Note. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:50, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Mariamnei,

Whilst I appreciate your checks (as Wikipedia is truly teamwork and is truly needed as protection for the site), I feel deletion is an unnecessary action and something I hope to resolve.

I wish to preface I made the article since Antonio Zeoli is still an active politician within the Santa Croce Del Sannio region and will be mayor until 2027. This addition was part of my wider efforts to update all pages related to the region and (if allowed) I wish to eventually do pages for all mayors of Santa Croce Del Sannio.

Santa Croce Del Sannio is suffering from population decline with an aging population and migration thus I can speculate that the town is likely going to have less than 1000 inhabitants for a long time.

In my personally experience on Wikipedia I have encountered pages 1-2 lines in size (without sources) and wish to have something cleared up. In the case of footballer Heinrich Altvater I found it in this condition and expanded it. Why do footballers' pages (because it is primarily footballers) allowed short pages, whilst politicians aren't. In this same case he played around 3 games and died in the 1920s, how does this pass the relevance test?

It is likely that during his later mayoral career he will make more press appearances like his predecessor, Antonio Di Maria. On this note I wish to ask, if the article is deleted, could I recreate his page if there are more sources and newspapers? or am I not allowed due to having the page deleted beforehand? I am relatively new to Wikipedia and cannot find an answer.

As for his doctorate, I found an election site with this detail on, confirmed by a deleted web doctor page. Because I was able to deduce that the page is relevant, is there any way I can show this research in a source?

I am currently looking for more sources, I have found a couple so far. I wish to save the page from deletion any way I can.

Many Thanks,

- Wikieditor451 WikiEditor451 (talk) 14:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

So sorry, wrong person! WikiEditor451 (talk) 14:03, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments! You can read about the Wikipedia:Notability guidelines, but in short, local politicians (meaning those who have been elected at a municipal level, as opposed to a national or state level, or those who ran for a position or were not elected) need to establish notability. You asked about another page. In general, Wikipedia:Other states that we evaluate each page, and we can't make the argument that "other things exist". If you can find more sources, you are certainly welcome to re-publish, and for exactly that reason I moved it to draft space rather than deleting it entirely. However, if it still does not meet the criteria, it will likely be removed again. Have a wonderful day. Mariamnei (talk) 11:11, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Antonio Zeoli

The article Antonio Zeoli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Mayor of a small town with populations of less than 1,000 inhabitants. Coverage is primary (even the two local news 'articles' merely quote two Zeoli's press releases). Also non notable as a surgeon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cavarrone 06:59, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Cavarrone,

Whilst I appreciate your checks (as Wikipedia is truly teamwork and is truly needed as protection for the site), I feel deletion is an unnecessary action and something I hope to resolve.

I wish to preface I made the article since Antonio Zeoli is still an active politician within the Santa Croce Del Sannio region and will be mayor until 2027. This addition was part of my wider efforts to update all pages related to the region and (if allowed) I wish to eventually do pages for all mayors of Santa Croce Del Sannio.

Santa Croce Del Sannio is suffering from population decline with an aging population and migration thus I can speculate that the town is likely going to have less than 1000 inhabitants for a long time.

In my personally experience on Wikipedia I have encountered pages 1-2 lines in size (without sources) and wish to have something cleared up. In the case of footballer Heinrich Altvater I found it in this condition and expanded it. Why do footballers' pages (because it is primarily footballers) allowed short pages, whilst politicians aren't. In this same case he played around 3 games and died in the 1920s, how does this pass the relevance test?

It is likely that during his later mayoral career he will make more press appearances like his predecessor, Antonio Di Maria. On this note I wish to ask, if the article is deleted, could I recreate his page if there are more sources and newspapers? or am I not allowed due to having the page deleted beforehand? I am relatively new to Wikipedia and cannot find an answer.

As for his doctorate, I found an election site with this detail on, confirmed by a deleted web doctor page. Because I was able to deduce that the page is relevant, is there any way I can show this research in a source?

I am currently looking for more sources, I have found a couple so far. I wish to save the page from deletion any way I can.

Many Thanks,

- Wikieditor451

WikiEditor451 (talk) 14:03, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, the problem is not that it is a short page, but that it does not meet the criteria of WP:POLITICIAN, which generally require holding a higher-level office than that of mayor of a very small town. This applies to Zeoli, to Di Maria, and likely to all of their predecessors in Santa Croce del Sannio, unless any of them also incidentally happened to hold a prominent national position such as deputy, senator, or regional president. And obviously the same standard applies to every mayor of a town of similar size. There could be exceptions, but, really, the person has to have received very significant coverage (not just announcements or political statements) in reputable sources like encyclopedias or major publications like -in the case of Italy - Corriere della Sera, La Repubblica or La Stampa (not Anteprima24.it or ntr24.tv). --Cavarrone 15:09, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the swift reply. Looking at he WP:POLITICIAN page it is rather unclear so thank you again for clarifying!

So just to clarify, his predecessor, Antonio Di Maria was president of Benevento - does this per Italian guidelines constitute importance, I was in the process of collecting information and he has had a bit of scandal in Benevento-based publications.

Should I still pursuit bringing the page up to code or is it futile since practically what's on the page is all that there is readily available.

Many thanks,

- Wikieditor451 WikiEditor451 (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

If there’s no national-level coverage in Corriere della Sera or similar sources, I'd say it is likely futile. --Cavarrone 19:39, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iglesia de San Juan Bautista (San Tirso de Abres), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint John. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi WikiEditor451. Thank you for your work on Judith Cunningham. Another editor, MichealKal, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!, Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MichealKal}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MichealKal (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello WikiEditor451! Your additions to Henry Burridge have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. win8x (talk) 21:01, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello win8x, WikiEditor451 (talk) 07:48, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello win8x,

There is no country on earth with a period of over 100 years copyrihht law. Henry Burridge who whilst having died in 1932, saw little activity post-1915. I ask politely for you to please reconsider what you have stricken for it is an impossibility for anything relating to Henry Burridge to be copyrighted, especially since UK copyright law itself is only 70 years + life - of which has fallen to public domain.

Many thanks,

Wikieditor451 WikiEditor451 (talk) 07:51, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Looking into it, I apologise for my prior concerns, I was confused thinking it was the image that was the problem. For future I will avoid quoting directly. I admit it was amateurish. Terribly sorry again!

- Wikieditor451 WikiEditor451 (talk) 11:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC)