October 2024

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John Woo have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: John Woo was changed by WifiFu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886916 on 2024-10-09T21:59:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Hello, WifiFu, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! User:Kowal2701 (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Kowal2701 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anthony Joshua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Ring. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply


Recent edit reversion

edit

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 00:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hi there. When you're adding references, it would be appreciated if you could use the cite template rather than just pasting in a URL between the reference tags. Just doing that means the reference is subject to link rot, whereas it's much easier to preserve references when the full citation template is used. It can be found here, with instructions for use. Thanks in advance. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I’m not sure exactly how to do it, I’ve tried a few times and I don’t want to mess things up. I also don’t know what link rot means. WifiFu (talk) 16:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amir Khan (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Molina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

December 2024

edit

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Natalie Portman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 20:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's perfectly acceptable to have relationship information in the lead. Please stop so others don't have to clean up after you. Sundayclose (talk) 20:13, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit reversion

edit

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, there was no violation of Wiki’s copyright policy. Sentences were all re-worded from the source cited. Tell me exactly what was copyrighted and I will improve it. WifiFu (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jason Statham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The One and Turn It Up.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deliberate removal of hidden notes, adding disputed content

edit

Hello, please do not add disputed content. The current infobox image on Kim Kardashian is the result of multiple, extensive talk page discussions. I would have given you the benefit of the doubt had the hidden note not been there, but you deliberately adding disputed content while removing the hidden note informing you of said dispute is a clear example of disruptive editing. Whenever another editor disagrees with you, it is upon you to seek dispute resolution. This is not done by forcing your edits into the article, but by engaging with other editors on talk pages.

Also note that piped links do not need to be changed if they redirect to the desired target article. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 19:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

January 2025

edit

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Mo Tse has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or imagesyou must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Diannaa (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brian Tee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Okinawa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

January 2025

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 18:25, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply