Wewillwee

Welcome!

Hi Wewillwee! I noticed your contributions to Tunbridge Wells Grammar School for Boys and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 22:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Borough Green have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Borough Green was changed by Wewillwee (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960615 on 2021-08-15T21:39:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

It was constructive it was updated as the list of shops and stuff was from 2017 4yrs ago Wewillwee (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Ightham

Your edit to the Ightham article has been revision deleted and will be oversighted. The policy on biologies of living people applies everywhere on Wikipedia. It is sufficient to state that the individual in question lives in Ightham. There is no need to reveal exactly where. This is for privacy reasons and also for security reasons. I hope you understand. Please do not do this again. Mjroots (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to HMS Matabele (F26)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Revd Canon Rachael Knapp

Hello, Wewillwee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Revd Canon Rachael Knapp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachael Knapp (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachael Knapp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:18, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wewillwee! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:18, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rachael Knapp

Hello, Wewillwee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rachael Knapp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 27 January 2026 (UTC)