Welovecontributors!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eliot K-8 Innovation School (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Absurdum4242 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Good job on the article so far, however, it’s not there yet. It still has a puff-piece advertisement tone, rather than being written in a neutral Encyclopedic tone. It also contains numerous details not best suited for a Wikipedia article, such as the administration section. As well, there is still the issue of notability raised by other reviewers. Notability requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the sources you have so far aren’t quite there. The Boston gov articles, and Raj Das articles aren’t independent, the statistics articles aren’t secondary, and the news articles mostly talk around the school itself, or have been cherry picked for the article. Try finding more independent news sources talking about the school, and then use the information in them (ALL of the information in them) to write a more neutrally framed article. If you do this, it will give you a much better chance of the article eventually being approved. Good luck and keep up the hard work 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eliot K-8 Innovation School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:38, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eliot K-8 Innovation School (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Breakfast and lunch times and bus services offered have no place in an encyclopaedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eliot K-8 Innovation School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eliot-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eliot-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Welovecontributorss! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Having trouble meeting notability requirements, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi there

It's great that you love contributing to Wikipedia. However, please consider reading the Manual of Style before doing it further. Don't capitalize random words unless there's a reason to (it might help to look at MOS:PEOPLETITLES). I also see you recently added a citation with the title in all caps — that's a big thing to avoid. If you need help, just ask. Thanks. — An anonymous username, not my real name 22:31, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I do have a bad habit of accidentally pressing shift for too long for a word.(or i accidentally clicked caps lock) I will try to improve. Welovecontributors! (talk) 22:49, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Welovecontributors!! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Article Help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Webspace

Hello, Welovecontributors!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Webspace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Welovecontributors!! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Free Images, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eliot-Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eliot-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: replacing a big part of the test with a entirely new part, which ruined the test! I reverted it! Come on dude! You can add a question but not rewrite the whole test because most people won't like it, including me! I'm a nice and great person in Wikipedia, but next time, please make smaller changes! Like, add a question! Hamimh2 (talk) 21:37, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:야미3434. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. A Wondrous Raven (talk) 03:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Welovecontributors!! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Citations, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

done

it's pretty much done Welovecontributors! [talk] 09:42, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Webspace

Hello, Welovecontributors!. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Webspace".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:25, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

test Welovecontributors! [talk] 11:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eliot K-8 Innovation School (May 22)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Timtrent, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for schools. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like sports results, league tables, government inspection reports, and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Individual faculties, departments, and student clubs are rarely notable on their own. You could add this content to the main educational institution article if one exists instead.

Schools are not inherently notable, nor does the whipping of a student make it so. Student were whipped in that era. Longevity does not make it notable. Please concentrate on what, if anything, makes it notable, and do a radical précis of the rest.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Eliot K-8 Innovation School to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Welovecontributors!! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Welovecontributors!! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Citation!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2016 Florida cocaine seize (May 27)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, .nhals8, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the event meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for events. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the event in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• show lasting significance: analysis published after the initial breaking news has passed, showing historical impact;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the event, such as press releases, the event or organizers own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all four of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

How and why is this event significant in narcotics?

Next steps

• Edit Draft:2016 Florida cocaine seize to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

nhals8 (rats in the house of the dead) 04:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Test(please ignore)

Discussion digest

Edit

12/16 07:42 Hoary: Thank you for the reversions. I start to feel sorry for these fools. And as long as they're vandalizing user and talk pages they're pretty harmless. --
12/18 01:58 Porte..rier): But the reward for a hard day's work bending over a paddy of mud in the hot sun is... a wee bowl of the stuff you've been planting. I think I'll soon be able to flesh out some of those pesky stublettes. By the way, the rice planters reminded me of a very interesting article I read a couple of years ago (online) about Japanese
12/22 22:36 Tony1: First the Swiss allowed train-loads of Jews to be moved by the Nazis through their patch; then they cooked the international finance rules; then they cook WP articles. Hmmph. I have a short film of a high official of one of the biggest Swiss banks, incredibly, admitting to collusion WRT > 100bn stolen by a dictator. I have a mind to post it on You-Tube. That would be letting off a big bomb, wouldn't it? But I don't want my holiday ruined next week by pesky journalists.
12/23 10:26 Omega SA: It's not a Swiss thing. I've found similar flatulence in at least one article about a Japanese watch company. The great majority of the article on
12/23 20:44 Image..9.jpg:
12/31 03:43 Image..e.jpg: ]]

Welovecontributors! [talk] 02:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Discussion digest

Edit

12/16 07:42 Hoary: Thank you for the reversions. I start to feel sorry for these fools. And as long as they're vandalizing user and talk pages they're pretty harmless. --
12/18 01:58 Porte..rier): But the reward for a hard day's work bending over a paddy of mud in the hot sun is... a wee bowl of the stuff you've been planting. I think I'll soon be able to flesh out some of those pesky stublettes. By the way, the rice planters reminded me of a very interesting article I read a couple of years ago (online) about Japanese
12/22 22:36 Tony1: First the Swiss allowed train-loads of Jews to be moved by the Nazis through their patch; then they cooked the international finance rules; then they cook WP articles. Hmmph. I have a short film of a high official of one of the biggest Swiss banks, incredibly, admitting to collusion WRT > 100bn stolen by a dictator. I have a mind to post it on You-Tube. That would be letting off a big bomb, wouldn't it? But I don't want my holiday ruined next week by pesky journalists.
12/23 10:26 Omega SA: It's not a Swiss thing. I've found similar flatulence in at least one article about a Japanese watch company. The great majority of the article on
12/23 20:44 Image..9.jpg:
12/31 03:43 Image..e.jpg: ]]

Welovecontributors! [talk] 02:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Test 2

Discussion digest

Edit

04/20 06:48 Wikip..ricas: I disagree with your reasons for declining the article. Currently, it already has three academic sources: Thomas Mocharitsh's diploma thesis on Ruthenian military terminology, Evan Samborowski's paper on Galician military units, and Alexei Lithavorik's Russian language research on Austro-Hungarian units on the Eastern Front. I can't find many in-depth sources online, even in German, but my plan was to add more to the article when they became available You are invited to participate in the
05/23 13:21 Nil NZ: They were unfortunately – the first few were real, with the hallucinated refs not starting until about a third of the way down the reflist. Only one of the links lead to an actual 404 page, with the majority just being homepage urls (e.g. "stuff.co.nz") rather than full urls, so it was easy to click on one and AGF that you were redirected. It wasn't until I manually searched for the article titles on each site (and the book title on the publisher's website) that I realised things were awry, but I was all set to mark it as reviewed up to that point 😩

Welovecontributors! [talk] 02:21, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Welovecontributors!! The thread you created at the Teahouse, 2nd Question today, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eliot K-8 Innovation School has been accepted

Eliot K-8 Innovation School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bgv. (talk) 04:06, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Signature colours

Hi there, your signature (yellow on white/brown on black) is almost impossible to read. Please consider changing the colour scheme. Thanks. Primefac (talk) 21:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

I already changed it days ago though! Check teahouse. Welovecontributors! [talk] 09:03, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Ah, my apologies, I was looking at the AFCH request, didn't see any comments here, and didn't think to check your most recent signatures. Thanks, and sorry for the bother! Primefac (talk) 20:43, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, you should probably change the colour scheme again; it's very hard to read your signature in dark mode. A Wondrous Raven (talk) 21:13, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Oh? I see white text on the black background. Primefac (talk) 22:24, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Adding background:#fff should fix it; see here. A Wondrous Raven (talk) 22:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

This is what it looks like: Welovecontributors! A Wondrous Raven (talk) 23:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Merci! Will do. Welovecontributors! [talk] 00:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Welovecontributors!! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Article Rating Needed, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Welovecontributors!. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! TonyBallioni (talk) 03:40, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Welovecontributors! [talk] 04:39, 3 June 2026 (UTC)