Conflict of interest guidelines

edit

Information icon Hello, VicSpiteri. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Alkagesta, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dreamyshade (talk) 16:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the reminder. I understand the COI guidance and I’m fully aware of the need to follow Wikipedia’s policies, especially when it comes to neutrality and sourcing. For clarity, I don’t have any external relationship with the subjects involved, nor am I editing on behalf of any company or individual. My comments on the talk page have been focused solely on sourcing consistency and policy compliance, which is why I’ve been raising questions about WP:RS and WP:BLP.
I’ll continue proposing any changes through the talk page as recommended, and I’m committed to keeping everything within the required guidelines. I appreciate the note and will keep the COI and paid‑editing rules in mind moving forward. VicSpiteri (talk) 12:49, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Could you please explain how you learned about the policies you cite in this comment, your 4th edit on this account? signed, Rosguill talk 15:41, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

March 2026

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Blue-Sonnet. An edit that you recently made to Talk:Alkagesta seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Blue Sonnet (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply