U249601

Welcome!

Hello, U249601, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as MidMichigan Therapeutic Massage Care, LLC, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheLongTone (talk) 19:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MidMichigan Therapeutic Massage Care, LLC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MidMichigan Therapeutic Massage Care, LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheLongTone (talk) 19:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Esau Khamati Oriedo, circa 1990 Portrait Photograph at Nairobi, Kenya.png

Thanks for uploading File:Esau Khamati Oriedo, circa 1990 Portrait Photograph at Nairobi, Kenya.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Esau Khamati Oriedo, circa 1990 Portrait Photograph at Nairobi, Kenya.png

Thanks for uploading File:Esau Khamati Oriedo, circa 1990 Portrait Photograph at Nairobi, Kenya.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Request that the administrator should delete this file as it's a duplicate file of the same photograph already in use from another file. Thank you. U249601 (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree files

See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 June 23#Two files 2. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Evangeline Olukhanya Khamati Ohana-Oriedo circa 1960s in Kenya Esau Khamati Oriedo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Evangeline Olukhanya Khamati Ohana-Oriedo circa 1960s in Kenya Esau Khamati Oriedo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Evangeline Olukhanya Khamati Ohana-Oriedo circa 1960s in Kenya Esau Khamati Oriedo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Evangeline Olukhanya Khamati Ohana-Oriedo circa 1960s in Kenya Esau Khamati Oriedo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

File ownership with pertinent email sent to Wikipedia OTRS team on Tue 6/24/2014 11:10 AM U249601 (talk)

Esau Khamati Oriedo

I have reverted your edits because you are ignoring Wikipedia style. i have done quite a lot of work trying to bring this in line with Wikipedia style, but you are continunig to edit int he style that you prefer. It is not my job to clean up after you. Here are some links to help you understand how to edit in Wikipedia, and how not to edit in Wikipedia:

• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters -- this will help you understand how to avoid overuse of capital letters
• WP:OVERLINK -- this will help you to understand when to link and when not to link
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting -- this will help you to learn how to use italicisation and boldfacing correctly, and learn how not to overuse it as you have been doing
• MOS:MARKUP -- this expains why we avoid using small and large fonts
• MOS:PARAGRAPHS -- this will explain how to make paragraph breaks -- there is no need to use </br> between paragraphs.

I hope this helps you become a better editor. Regards, Ground Zero | t 20:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

"Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo |"Reviewer needed!

I am in need of a reviewer for "Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo" article.U249601 (talk) 16:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)U249601 (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

I am looking for a reviewer of your acumen for this article. Are you available?|

Hello, U249601. You have new messages at Crosstemplejay's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

U249601 (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, U249601. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, U249601. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your message regarding my recent edits to the Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo article. I appreciate the reminder about the importance of clear and accurate edit summaries.

I would like to clarify that I am the lead contributor responsible for the research, drafting, and development of the article. The recent edits did not remove, alter, or replace any of the original content, citations, or factual material. The substance of the article remains fully intact.

The edits in question were focused on:

• correcting formatting issues that were causing citation‑system errors
• restoring proper reflist structure for both the main references and the note group
• integrating previously drafted material into the appropriate sections
• improving section organization for clarity and MOS compliance
• ensuring the article reads as a coherent, neutral, and well‑structured biography

No sourced content, templates, or factual claims were removed. The misunderstanding arose because my edit summary did not fully describe the scope of the cleanup and integration work. I acknowledge that the summary was insufficiently detailed, and I appreciate the reminder. I will ensure that future edit summaries are more precise and transparent so that other editors can easily follow the development of the article.

Thank you again for your vigilance and for helping maintain the quality and clarity of Wikipedia’s editing process. I remain committed to collaborative editing and to ensuring the article meets Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality, verifiability, and structural integrity. ~2026-73313-0 (talk) 01:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, again, once more thank you for your message. To avoid any appearance of edit‑warring, I will refrain from restoring the enhanced version of the article until I hear back from you. I hope we can address the concerns constructively and in line with Wikipedia’s content policies.

Regarding the phrase “lead contributor,” this was not intended as a formal designation under any Wikipedia policy. It simply reflects that I have contributed the majority of the research, drafting, structural organization, and citation work on the article over time. It was not meant to imply ownership or exclusive authority over the page.

More importantly, I want to clarify that none of my edits blanked, removed, or altered any original content, citations, or templates. The edits focused on:

• improving grammatical structure and readability
• correcting citation and reflist formatting
• resolving markup issues that were causing display errors
• enhancing neutrality and clarity
• integrating previously drafted material
• aligning the article more closely with MOS guidelines

All substantive content remained intact. The misunderstanding appears to stem from an insufficiently detailed edit summary, not from the edits themselves. I appreciate the reminder and will ensure that future summaries are more explicit and transparent.

Regarding the concern about “AI‑generated” edits: all edits were made manually and intentionally. Tools may assist with grammar or structure, but the editorial decisions, sourcing, and content integration are my own. Wikipedia policy requires editors to take responsibility for their contributions, and I do.

Once again allow me to emphasize that I am committed to collaborative editing and to upholding Wikipedia’s core content policies—verifiability, neutrality, and no original research. If there are specific content issues you believe require attention, I welcome a focused discussion on the article’s Talk page so we can address them constructively and based on sources and policy. U249601 (talk) 00:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

How you were declared the "lead contributor" to this article? Which specific Wikipedia policies was this based on?

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Responding specifically to the warning that I “blanked out or removed portions of page content, templates, or other materials.”

To be clear, none of my edits removed, blanked, or altered any original content, citations, or templates in the Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo article. All substantive material remained intact. The edits I made were limited to:

• correcting citation and reflist markup
• resolving formatting and display issues
• improving grammar, structure, and readability
• integrating previously drafted material
• aligning the article more closely with MOS guidelines

These are constructive edits intended to improve clarity, neutrality, and verifiability — not content removal.

I understand that the edit earlier summary I used may not have fully conveyed the scope of the cleanup work, and I appreciate the reminder to be more explicit in future summaries. However, the warning about “blanking” does not accurately reflect what occurred.

I am committed to editing in good faith and to working collaboratively. If there are specific lines or sections you believe were removed or altered, please point them out so we can review them together based on the article’s history and Wikipedia’s content policies.

Thank you. U249601 (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Responding specifically to the warning that I was “unconstructively editing Wikipedia using a large language model.”

To clarify, all edits were made manually and intentionally, based on my own research, drafting, and editorial judgment. While tools may assist with grammar or structure — just as spell‑checkers, citation managers, or markup validators do — the decisions about what to include, how to structure the article, and how to integrate sources were entirely my own.

Wikipedia does not prohibit the use of tools, but it does require editors to take responsibility for the accuracy, neutrality, and appropriateness of their contributions. I fully meet that requirement.

The edits in question were constructive and focused on:

• improving grammar, structure, and readability
• correcting citation and reflist formatting
• resolving markup issues that were causing display errors
• enhancing neutrality and clarity
• integrating previously drafted material
• aligning the article more closely with MOS guidelines

No content was blanked, removed, or altered in a way that changed meaning or sourcing.

If there are specific sentences or sections you believe were improperly added or modified, please identify them so we can review them together based on the article’s history and Wikipedia’s core content policies: verifiability, neutrality, and no original research.

Again, I remain committed to collaborative editing and to maintaining high standards of quality in the article. U249601 (talk) 00:26, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

== Talk-page discussion opened regarding recent reverts ==

Hello, and thank you. I wanted to let you know that I have opened a detailed discussion on the article’s Talk page regarding the recent reverts and warnings.

You can find it here:

Talk:Blasio Vincent Ndale Esau Oriedo#Request for clarification regarding recent reverts and warnings

The section includes:

• diffs of the edits in question
• clarification regarding the “blanking/removal” warning
• clarification regarding the “AI-generated edits” warning
• a redundancy audit of the citations
• a request for policy-based explanation of the reverts

I would appreciate your input there so we can resolve the matter collaboratively and in line with WP:BRD.

Thank you. U249601 (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J Vincent B Oriedo (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:J Vincent B Oriedo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, U249601! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ibjaja055 (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J Vincent B Oriedo (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by EatingCarBatteries were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to include some kind of identifiers (DOI, ISBN, URL) in your sources so the reviewers (and the readers!) can know that they're real.

This page is very jargon-heavy. While I know nothing about chemistry, there should be some additional, high-level context provided (or links to other articles which provide more context).

Also, this article is very heavily detailed, with a lot of fluff and resume-like content. Wikipedia isn't exhaustive. Instead of including every little bit about the Oriedo, include only what exists in reliable sources, preferring those which are independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:J Vincent B Oriedo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 00:05, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Structural Concerns About AfC Review of Scientific and Technical Topics

Please do not post AI-generated messages to central noticeboards.

Also, what is your relationship with J Vincent B Oriedo? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Please stop forum shopping. It is disruptive. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:13, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J Vincent B Oriedo (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScalarFactor was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:J Vincent B Oriedo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ScalarFactor (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:J Vincent B Oriedo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:J Vincent B Oriedo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Stop using LLMs to communicate

Please stop using LLMs to communicate with other editors. It also appears that you have a conflict of interest with the Oriedo family. What is your relationship with them? voorts (talk/contributions) 03:06, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for raising the concern. To clarify, I am not using any LLMs to communicate with editors; all comments and edits are written manually.

Regarding conflict of interest: I do have a personal knowledge of the subject, and that is precisely why I am approaching this transparently and in accordance with Wikipedia’s COI guidelines. My familiarity with the topic is what motivates me to contribute, to help inform the article with accurate, independently verifiable information, and to ensure that the content reflects reliable secondary sources rather than personal perspective.

Subject‑matter familiarity is normal and often necessary when contributing to technical or scientific topics, and I am taking care to avoid editorial bias and to adhere fully to Wikipedia’s neutrality and sourcing standards. Again, I appreciate the reminder and will continue working within policy. U249601 (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

What does "personal knowledge" mean specifically in this context? ~2026-10493-92 (talk) 13:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

By “personal knowledge,” I simply mean subject‑matter familiarity based on my scientific background and prior work in the field. I am not referring to private information or non‑public sources, and I am not relying on any unpublished material. All content I propose is based strictly on publicly available, independently verifiable secondary sources, in line with COI and sourcing policies. U249601 (talk) 14:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:U249601/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:U249601/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. HurricaneZeta^C 03:24, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:U249601/sandbox5

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:U249601/sandbox5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. HurricaneZeta^C 16:34, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 17:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

You are clearly using LLMs to communicate and you clearly have a conflict of interest given that you are only writing articles about a single family. Until you start communicating without using an LLM and disclose your conflicts of interest, you will not be unblocked. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:25, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

U249601 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I would like to clarify the concerns raised in the block notice.

(1) LLM use: I am not using any large language model to communicate with editors or to generate article content. All of my comments and edits are written manually. If any of my writing appeared overly formal or structured, I am happy to adjust my communication style to avoid any misunderstanding.

(2) Conflict of interest: I acknowledge that I have subject‑matter familiarity with the scientific topics involved, and I have been transparent about that. This familiarity does not involve any private, unpublished, or non‑public information, nor does it reflect a personal relationship with the subject. All content I have proposed is based strictly on publicly available, independently verifiable secondary sources, in full compliance with WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:COI. I am fully willing to follow COI best practices, including proposing changes on talk pages rather than editing directly.

(3) Transparency and good faith: I want to emphasize that I have been editing openly and in good faith. If my intention were to evade scrutiny or act with ulterior motives, I would not be editing under a single, consistent account or openly discussing COI concerns. My goal has been to contribute verifiable, reliably sourced scientific information. None of the content I proposed has been challenged on factual or sourcing grounds; the concerns raised relate to perceived behavior rather than the accuracy of the material. I am committed to ensuring that all contributions remain neutral, policy‑compliant, and grounded in independent secondary sources.

(4) Here to build the encyclopedia: My intent is to contribute constructively to scientific and technical topics using reliable sources. I am committed to working collaboratively with other editors and following all relevant policies and guidelines.

I respectfully request that an uninvolved administrator review this block. I am happy to answer any questions or follow any guidance needed to ensure my editing remains fully policy‑compliant. U249601 (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I used three different checkers, two of them gave 100% certainty this was AI generated, the other was 89%. I agree with voorts, people do not talk like this, even using a formal style. I looked at this post and this post from 2017, clearly different from your current writing. Clearly you're using an AI now and weren't then. Until we are talking with you directly, there is zero chance you will be unblocked or even have your requests actually reviewed. 331dot (talk) 08:11, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am happy to adjust my communication style to avoid any misunderstanding. No human being writes or talks like this. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:48, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

And regarding #2, you are required to disclose your COI. Yes or no, will you declare a conflict of interest with regard to the Oriedo family? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:50, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Note the Markdown usage. Please stop using LLMs to communicate, and consider contributing to the Wikipedia in your native language if you aren't proficient in English. To be unblocked, you should first come clean about your LLM usage. HurricaneZeta^C 01:50, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

I am okay with an unblock if:

1. U249601 starts communicating without an LLM;
2. they agree to assist with cleanup of any LLM content they've added to Wikipedia; and
3. they either:
   • declare a COI with regard to the Oriedo family and agree to make edit requests going forward or
   • agree to an indefinite topic ban from the Oriedo family, broadly construed.

Otherwise, I am opposed to an unblock. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:12, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

I've reverted your pseudo edit request. Unless your next edit is another unblock request using your own words, and not a robot, I will block you from editing your talk page entirely. voorts (talk/contributions) 14:45, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Voorts,

I just want to confirm that I am not attempting to edit the article or bypass my block. My intention was only to request review by uninvolved editors and to provide sourcing information in a manner consistent with the expectations for blocked editors with a conflict of interest, so that the two long‑standing articles can be evaluated and brought into full compliance with Wikipedia policy by neutral editors. I will not post anything further except an unblock request or information directly requested by administrators.

Again, thanks. U249601 (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 voorts (talk/contributions) 00:16, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #111166 has been declined. JBW (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)