TheSkipperToo

Draft moved

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Nathan Carlin. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Carlin (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is written as a CV. Write instead using summary style in the form that is suitable for an encyclopedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan Carlin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, TheSkipperToo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nathan Carlin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nathan Carlin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Carlin (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

• meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
• or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
  

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

References need to take the reader to a page where the statement can be verified, not just to the home page of a website. Instead of just using references to verify statements, you'll need to add references that show that Carlin's life and work has been written about by multiple reliable, independent publications. See WP:NPROF.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan Carlin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Carlin has been accepted

Nathan Carlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:33, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Nathan Carlin

Hello, TheSkipperToo,

Thank you for creating Nathan Carlin.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Notability through named chair at university (Samuel E. Karff Chair; Samuel E. Karff Chair). Quite a few of the references are by Carlin, and his impact is low (H-factor of 8), but meets one of the WP:NPROF criteria.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Issues with Institute for Spirituality and Health

Hello, I'm User:SomeoneDreaming. The page you created, Institute for Spirituality and Healthseemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. I appreciate that you did go back and add sources for the information; however, these sources were mostly primary, and it's important to add information from verifiable, secondary sources rather than from the organization itself. Additionally, some of the text was copied or closely paraphrased from the sources. I'm not sure whether this was due to using a large language model or just not realizing that Wikipedia text needs to be original. But it seems like you're interested in creating articles, so I wanted to flag these for you so that you're aware for next time. If you have any questions, feel free to respond here and I'd be happy to answer them. You can also check out the Wikipedia:Teahouse for a quicker response.

Happy editing! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 22:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Institute for Spirituality and Health for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute for Spirituality and Health is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute for Spirituality and Health until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)