December 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm HKLionel. An edit that you recently made to List of United States over-the-air television networks seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! it's lio! | talk | work 09:53, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to OCN (TV channel), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. it's lio! | talk | work 10:00, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

icon Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to ITN. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. it's lio! | talk | work 10:13, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit

Hello, SuperLine900, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to List of United States over-the-air television networks seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! it's lio! | talk | work 14:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion

edit

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is SuperLine900's questionable editing behavior. HKLionel TALK 13:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odisha Pro T20 League (January 3)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quinntropy was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No changes made since previous submission. Previous decline reason still applies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 Quinn ΘΔ 23:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, SuperLine900! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  Quinn ΘΔ 23:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

January 2026

edit
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Fences&Windows 12:57, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperLine900 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

i have here to build an encyclopedia

Decline reason:

In which case, could you explain this edit? PhilKnight (talk) 04:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SuperLine900 (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed your appeal template for you, but this appeal definitely won't be accepted because you've not properly addressed the reason for your block nor shown that you understand how to edit productively in future.

Please read the Guide to appealing blocks and either amend the text in your original appeal, delete it and start a new one, or write the missing information in a reply to this post.

Remember that you need to show a full understanding of why your edits weren't appropriate for Wikipedia and how to avoid doing it in future. Blue Sonnet (talk) 03:58, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply