Srambled089

Welcome!

Hi Srambled089! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! GoldRomean (talk) 13:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sambodhi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sambodhi. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sambodhi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sambodhi. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:00, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sambodhi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sambodhi. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:44, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, a number of those references were blogs and opinion pieces which mentioned Sambodhi in the contributor panel and not the main body copy; they have been removed after feedback from you and @DoubleGrazing. See if the referencing is cleaner now? Srambled089 (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Srambled089! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Tentative editing - Sherlock (TV series) - Inclusion of criticism, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:17, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sambodhi (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sambodhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:13, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for reviewing, @SafariScribe.

I appreciate the update and would like to request further help in the matter of this article. But, first up, I love your profile's content and the fact that you're trying to highlight a region which, in the English Wikipedia, is not given the attention it deserves.

I am trying to do something similar for India-based social sciences and research articles (though I will not be restricting myself to such); I find they are either lacking in information and notability, or non-existent in the first place. This - in conjunction with a government whose data is either delayed, manipulated, or entirely absent - is creating a rather noticeable hole in the knowledge economy around key social impact issues in India. It doesn't help that there is very little in-depth independent coverage about such organisations/institutions and their work here, unless they are embroiled in some form of a scandal (see Pratap Bhanu Mehta and Centre for Policy Research, or the recent Ashoka University professor's social media comments) or are already well-connected and media-savvy (see again Pratap Bhanu Mehta, son of a former VP of the University of Delhi, and Ashoka University).

Now, to the query. You have outlined four reasons - in-depth, reliable, secondary, strictly independent of the subject for the published sources - as reasons for rejection. While I have no doubt that the reasons are valid, I would love some specific suggestions on how to improve the draft to make it acceptable, not only for this submission but also for future articles which feature other research/educational/on-ground organisations doing notable work in the field of social impact.

Would this talk page be a good enough place to discuss it, given you will be in a better position to indicate specific improvements, or would you prefer it be posted in the helpdesk?

Thanking you in advance. Srambled089 (talk) 16:47, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Edit: Instead of "...not only for this submission but also for...", I posit "Understanding what specific aspects to improve will help not only for this submission but also for..."

Also, side note, if you have the time: how do you recommend garnering eligibility for NPP? I would love to help out and clear some backlog for the community. Srambled089 (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Srambled089! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:13, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sambodhi

Hello, Srambled089. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sambodhi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 29 April 2026 (UTC)