Spectritus

2026

January

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eileen Winterton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Cross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@DPL bot I know. For once it was deliberate. Spectritus (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Christopher Baker (director)

Hello, Spectritus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christopher Baker (director), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Michael Carrick edit

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Michael Carrick, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mattythewhite Sorry, I got confused because a news article I read mentioned him as caretaker. Spectritus (talk) 20:27, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Emma Watson edit

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Emma Watson. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing.

READ THIS:

See here for the discussion. Seasider53 (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I've read it and I understand. But, I would like to note two things: first, I think her modeling is notable and secondly she quit acting so it should say "former actress". Spectritus (talk) 14:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

You don't get to decide though. Seasider53 (talk) 14:21, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Why would we not say former when she clearly stated that she has quit acting? Tell me. Spectritus (talk) 14:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

As for her notability as model it was debated in the original discussion but the debate was never finished so I think it's worth opening a new discussion. Spectritus (talk) 14:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Well then, "retired" is different than "former" since she will return back to the role soon, says https://variety.com/2023/film/news/emma-watson-acting-break-five-years-caged-1235600852/ Q Gravelle (talk) 15:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough. Spectritus (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

February

Concern regarding Draft:Shalka Doctor

Hello, Spectritus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shalka Doctor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Duvall 1963.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Duvall 1963.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

@B-bot Understood. Thanks. Spectritus (talk) 18:50, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

March

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward de Souza, a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Graham was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Steph de Whalley

Hello, Spectritus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steph de Whalley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

New Audrey image

I don't like the black and white image. The article was already perfect before. As she's a spirit now, she's been living with me since late 2023. I don't want to see a black and white image on her article. --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-17547-21 It's standard practice to use a black and white image for deceased people if a free one is available. Spectritus (talk) 07:53, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-17547-21 If you prefer there's also File:Audrey Hepburn 1956 (2).jpg. Spectritus (talk) 07:57, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from saying "deceased", that's disrespectful. I have soulmate connection to her and don't need others mentioning the word deceased. She's never dead, just becuse she doesn't have a body, doesn't mean she ain't around. She's a spirit. And I don't like looking at the black and white image, it's an utter eyesore. And no, it's not a standard practise to use black and white images. Coloured ones are just as timeless. I hppe you understand thank you! --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 10:48, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

There is actually no official policy stating that images of "deceased" people must be in black and white. --~2026-17547-21 (talk) 10:58, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-17547-21 It's still standard practice when there's a free one which is the case here. Spectritus (talk) 11:27, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

There is no such “standard practice” Rcarter555 (talk) 14:26, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Audrey Hepburn infobox image

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Audrey Hepburn. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Legendbird (talk) 11:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Short descriptions

Hi Spectritus. This change was not constructive. Short description should be short; see WP:SDLENGTH. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 00:22, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on Hello. I understand your concern, but I think it's still short enough and it should show all of the person's occupations not just one as it would be misleading. Spectritus (talk) 09:57, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Short descriptions should ideally use 40 characters or less, your version had 82 characters. They are meant to help readers identify the desired article when searching. We don't need to list all of a subject's occupations for people to be able to realise they have found the article they're looking for.

From reading the article it appears that Wiseman was primarily known for making film documentaries so the short description "filmmaker" – or alternatively "documentarian" – seems sufficient to me. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on Okay. Fair point. Spectritus (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Cool. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Checkland, a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:39, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

April

CS1 error on List of semi-supercentenarians (actors, filmmakers and entertainers)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of semi-supercentenarians (actors, filmmakers and entertainers), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:20, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Charles Bronson (disambiguation)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Charles Bronson (disambiguation), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

May

BRD

See WP:BRD: you were BOLD, but you've now been REVERTED twice. Now is the time for you to DISCUSS your proposed changes on the talk page. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:44, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your Arbitrary Selective Changes of Words in American English to British English

I read the summary of your edit, where you repeatedly changed two selective words from American English to British English. Therein, you state "Subject isn't American and therefore the article shouldn't be in US English.", while the subject itself is German. Foremost, I did not find any criterion for WP articles from which your reasoning follows. For instance, your edit actually goes against MOS:ENGVAR as it mixes both versions in the same article, even for the same word. Hence, I cannot see any improvement from your edit, quite the contrary. Could you please point me to the regulation from which you draw your reasoning? Otherwise, I consider your edits as erroneous. Proof finder (talk) 16:14, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

@Proof finder Perhaps, I misinterpreted the rule and it's just US English in articles about Unitedstatesian subjects and UK English in articles about British subjects. Can you confirm? Also, that article already mixed both since it used the British date format and some US spellings before I edited it. Spectritus (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick reply! Okay, I suppose that I can then safely revert your edit. I assume that you were thinking of MOS:TIES, right? For a German academic in mathematics, I can clearly not identify strong ties to any particular English-speaking country (see also MOS:DATETIES). My interpretation of that rule is furthermore that it does not apply to any, e.g., US or British subject, but only those that have specifically national ties, e.g., an article about a place therein, but not necessarily a person (if not, for instance, a president of such a place).

For the article in question, MOS:RETAIN makes much more sense to me.

Sure, feel free to edit the date format and some other British spellings therein. What I found particularly disturbing about your edit was that you did only edit a subset of all occurrences for the particular word you were editing. Proof finder (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

@Proof finder I didn't go through the entire article, that's why I didn't change all the US spellings. I will leave the British date format as it's commonly used in articles about people from non-English-speaking countries. Spectritus (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Peter Fraser (screenwriter)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Peter Fraser (screenwriter). This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Jkaharper (talk) 17:28, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

@Jkaharper Hello. I've read your latest edit summary. So, shouldn't the WP:BDP paragraph on Category:Possibly living people, "Per WP:BDP, any individual born before 1911 (115 or more years ago) whose living status remains undetermined should be removed from this category and transferred to Category:Year of death missing (or possibly Category:Year of death unknown only if reliable sources confirm the death, but say that the person's year of death is unknown)", be changed? Spectritus (talk) 17:52, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alexander Devrient

Hello, Spectritus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexander Devrient, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Francis Rigaud

Hello, Spectritus. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Francis Rigaud".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:25, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Michael Keating

Hello, I see that you've added details of Keating's death, based on a single post on X. Do you have any other information regarding this? ArthurTheGardener (talk) 11:46, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@ArthurTheGardener Hello. I don't have any more info. All I know is that two reliable people from the film and TV area have reported it on Bluesky and X. Also, the post I cited is from Bluesky not X. Spectritus (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thanks (and sorry for the mistake, I'm not on either X or Bluesky, but they do look very similar!). It's just that there hasn't been any official announcement that I can find (so far). ArthurTheGardener (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@ArthurTheGardener https://uk.news.yahoo.com/blakes-7-eastenders-legend-dies-123000813.html Spectritus (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/michael-keating-1947-2026 Spectritus (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for checking. RIP. I loved that show. ArthurTheGardener (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@ArthurTheGardener You're welcome. Spectritus (talk) 15:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

WIkiProject Doctor Who: April 2026 Newsletter

The Space-Time Telegraph Volume IV, Issue I — April 2026 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who A new newsletter materializing? Quick, help us reverse the polarity of the neutron flow so it can safely land on your talk pages! Don't be lasagna (because there's a new newsletter to read) Hello, and welcome to our first 2026 issue of The Space-Time Telegraph. Inside you'll find plenty of information about recent happenings in our little Who corner of Wikipedia. We've also included a plethora of Doctor Who news you may have missed elsewhere in the last few months such as the finding of previously missing episodes, upcoming and recent product releases, a new streaming home for Who across the pond (and even a potential future partnership for new episodes). So what are you waiting for? Go ahead and jump on in! Into the Vortex! (Of Good and Featured Content) Since our newsletter last December, the Doctor Who WikiProject has seen a large amount of quality article improvement. So far, 16 Good Articles have been improved this year! We're at about the same pace we were last year, which is always good to see, especially given the twelve other articles nominated for GA status at present. Special shoutouts to users Rhain for their improvements on First Doctor serials, SkywalkerEccleston for their various improvements across a wide variety of articles, Lbal for their work on Full Circle (Doctor Who), and Doomitron for their work on Sixth Doctor. Additionally, since then, Ice Warrior has been improved to Featured Article status, List of Doctor Who creatures and aliens and List of Doctor Who characters have been improved to Featured List status, and three Good Topics focused on articles relating to the Midnight Entity, the Slitheen, and Doctor Who series 15 have been nominated and approved. Congratulations to all of the users who have improved quality Doctor Who articles in the past few months! A flabbergasting discovery In March, it was announced that episodes 1 ("The Nightmare Begins") and 3 ("Devil's Planet") of The Daleks' Master Plan were found by the charity Film is Fabulous! in a private collection among some films. The collector gave them permission to have them and sadly passed away not long after. Upon learning of the discovery through Toby Hadoke, actor Peter Purves, who starred in the episodes alongside William Hartnell and Adrienne Hill, said "My flabber has never been so gasted". The episodes were shown at a BFI screening (with Purves in attendance) in April and are now available on BBC iPlayer in the UK and the official Doctor Who Classic YouTube channel in the US. This means that episodes 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 of The Daleks' Master Plan are now available. It has been hinted that more could be found in the near future as 95 episodes remain missing. Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network The 1996 American-produced Doctor Who television film was remastered in 4K using the original film reels for a Blu-ray release this May. The restored version includes both the UK and U.S. broadcast versions and new special features. Big Finish Productions recently extended their contract with the BBC to continue licensing the Doctor Who franchise intellectual property for audio stories through 2035. The first new production to be confirmed following this announcement, is a fifteen-part box set featuring David Tennant set to begin releasing bimonthly next year. In February, the First Doctor serial The Rescue was published on vinyl record as a special release for Record Store Day in the United Kingdom. Circuit Breaker, a new multi-platform story starring Jo Martin as the Fugitive Doctor was announced by BBC Studios to launch this June. Spanning audio, books, comics, games, magazine, internet, and Blu-ray releases, tells a singular interconnected story about UNIT's Black Archive across several mediums. Seventeen years after its last release, Character Options is releasing a new five-part set of Doctor Who figures beginning in July. In the United States, AMC+ has secured rights to be the exclusive streaming video on demand host of all 2005–2022 Doctor Who episodes. This era of Who has been unavailable to stream in the States since its removal from HBO Max in July 2025. Noticeably absent from press releases are mention of spin-off series Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures; while these shows have historically been packaged with this era of Who in streaming deals on HBO Max, before that on Amazon Prime Video, as well as Netflix and Hulu in the ancient days, there is no confirmation if these will be included. Elsewhere in America, Classic Who has it's own streaming home on BritBox (yes, BritBox still exists on this side of the pond), while the 60th anniversary specials and Gatwa's era remain on Disney+ for the foreseeable future. Disney has also yet to release The War Between the Land and the Sea, a five-part miniseries previously marketed by the company as releasing outside of the UK and Ireland in "early 2026". There is also no news on where, if anywhere, future episodes of Who will air or stream in the United States (or elsewhere worldwide, for that matter); however, AMC Global Media (the owner of AMC+) owns BBC America, which it regularly licenses BBC content for and was the linear broadcaster of Who from 2009–2022, and a non-controlling ownership stake in BritBox. AMC+ was also previously the next-day streamer of Who episodes during the Jodie Whittaker/Chris Chibnall-era as a transitional period between their broadcast on BBC America and release on HBO Max. Given this, and the global reach of AMC+, it's a feasible home for future new episodes and even the rumored potential of a co-production deal to fill the funding deficit left by Disney. Succession The oldest-living person associated with the Whoniverse since Arnold Yarrow's death in December 2024, Laurie Webb, sadly passed away on 29 March aged 101 years, 327 days. He remains the fifth longest-lived person associated with the Whoniverse and the tenth to become a centenarian. The title of oldest-living person associated with the Whoniverse is now held by 97-year-old Peter Cellier (Time-Flight). Contributors Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) Spectritus (talk) TheDoctorWho (talk) Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹 Since the previous issue was published, a number of people related to the Whoniverse have sadly passed away and some who passed away before the previous issue only had their deaths announced recently: 2022 October – Tony Scoggo, 86, actor (Terror of the Vervoids) 2023 25 March – Douglas Sheldon, 87, actor (The Daleks' Master Plan) 2024 Q1 – Susanna Carroll, 90 or 91, actress (Galaxy 4) 9 December – Julia Burnett, 70, actress (The Hand of Fear) 29 December – Nick Hobbs, 78, actor (The Curse of Peladon, The Ark in Space, "Amy's Choice" and more) 2025 Before 15 February – Geoffrey Keep, 76 or 77, convention regular and First Doctor cosplayer Before 14 April – Harriet Philpin, 73, actress (Genesis of the Daleks) 30 June – Jim Shooter, 73, editor-in-chief (1984–86 Doctor Who comic series by Marvel Comics) 11 August – Mike Winser, 83, OB cameraman (The Ultimate Foe) 14 August – Carol Sadler, 62, camerawoman (some unspecified 1980s serials) 28 August – John J. Johnston, 60, contributor to Doctor Who Magazine 3 September – Keith Hodiak, 75, actor ("The Five Doctors") 7 October – Tony Handy, 91, actor (The Underwater Menace) 1 November – Aidan White, 56, actor ("Partners in Crime") 7 November – Clemente Rezzónico, 90, artist (Daleks, invasión a la Tierra año 2150) 8 November – Geoff Beech, 81, studio cameraman (some unspecified 1960s and 1970s serials) 11 November – Nigel Walters, 84, camera assistant (The Ambassadors of Death) 11 November – Peter Sowerbutts, 76, actor (multiple audio stories) 16 November – Quenton Annis, 84, assistant floor manager (The Ice Warriors) 28 November – Carol Lawrence, 81, costume designer (Chute!) 3 December – John Dillon, 92, actor (The Savages) 8 December – Tony Van Silva, 75, stunt performer ("Tooth and Claw") 19 December – Richard Barnes, 81, actor (Nightmare of Eden) December – Roger Bamford, unknown age, floor assistant (The Daleks' Master Plan) 2025 – Rita Dunn, 92, production assistant (Snakedance) 2025 – George Reed, 91, visual effects assistant (The Seeds of Doom, The Talons of Weng-Chiang, Castrovalva, and many more) 2025 – Jan Spoczynski, 76 or 77, designer (Snakedance) and design assistant (Revenge of the Cybermen) 2026 1 January – Gregory de Polnay, 82, actor (The Robots of Death) 2 January – Colin Bell, 80, actor (The Sea Devils, Invasion of the Dinosaurs) 9 January – Tina Packer, 87, actress (The Web of Fear) 10 January – Derek Martin, 92, actor (Image of the Fendahl, The Romans, The Massacre and more) and stuntman (The Ambassadors of Death, The Mind of Evil, The Claws of Axos) 11 January – Marcus Gilbert, 67, actor (Battlefield, UNIT: Brave New World: Knightfall) 13 January – Paul Grist, 86, actor (The Claws of Axos) 14 January – Donald Douglas, 92, actor (The Sontaran Experiment) 16 January – Hazel Ellerby, 67, actress (Torchwood: Cadoc Point) 31 January – Lorne Martin, 79, props buyer (Doctor Who: The Tom Baker Years) and head of BBC Exhibitions 9 February – Tony Millier, 85, studio sound provider (The Enemy of the World, Colony in Space, The Dæmons and many more) 7 March – Paul Seed, 78, actor (The Ribos Operation) 17 March – Mike Smith, 87, helicopter pilot (Fury from the Deep, The Dæmons) 18 March – Tom Georgeson, 89, actor (Genesis of the Daleks, Logopolis) 25 March – Sheila S. Tomlinson, 100, film editor (Revenge of the Cybermen) 29 March – Laurie Webb, 101, actor (The Three Doctors) 6 April – Angela Pleasence, 84, actress ("The Shakespeare Code", The Curse of Clyde Langer) 10 April – Jan Williams, 87, actress (The Ark) April – Jill Curzon, 87, actress (Daleks' Invasion Earth 2150 A.D.) 2 May – Barbara Kinghorn, 81, actress (The Caves of Androzani) 3 May – Joyce Hawkins, 95, costume designer (Horror of Fang Rock) 14 May – Alan Rothwell, 89, actor (The Twilight Kingdom) 18 May – Tom Kane, 64, actor (LEGO Dimensions) May – Michael Keating, 79, actor (The Sun Makers, The Twilight Kingdom, Year of the Pig, The Evil One, The End) Unknown year Tom Reeve, unknown age, dresser (Full Circle, Paradise Towers, Delta and the Bannermen) Brian Holloway, unknown age, cameraman (some unspecified serials in the 1960s and 1970s) Dave Carter, unknown age, actor (Doctor Who and the Silurians, Inferno, Terror of the Autons, and many more) If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above. If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)