Your submission at Articles for creation: Harsh Gujral (November 18)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Saritasanghvi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 18)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Do not submit more than one version. Concentrate own the prior submission. Multiple submissions reduce the chance of acceptance since they are seen as an attempt to game the system
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harsh Gujral (November 19)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Harsh Gujral is surely a great comic and youtuber, but notability isn't determined by that. I almost find it tragic that these comics do such good work but the temporal nature of their work doesn't merit them notability honestly.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harsh Gujral (November 20)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Does not appear to meet WP:ENTERTAINER.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 07:38, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

You've got Talkback!

edit
Hello, Saritasanghvi. You have new messages at HitroMilanese's talk page.
Message added 06:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Hitro talk 06:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Saritasanghvi/sandbox

edit

Information icon Hello, Saritasanghvi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Saritasanghvi/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Harsh Gujral

edit

Information icon Hello, Saritasanghvi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harsh Gujral, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Saritasanghvi/sandbox

edit

Hello, Saritasanghvi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply