RotatingPirateShip

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuak SkyRide hoax (April 5)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Theroadislong, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Kuak SkyRide hoax to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, RotatingPirateShip! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuak SkyRide hoax (April 6)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. This sort of "dog rescues man from well" story is the sort of thing newspapers publish to pad out a slow news day, it's not the sort of thing that belongs on an encyclopedia, because it very rarely has the sort of lasting impact that we require to consider an event notable.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Athanelar (talk) 00:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello RotatingPirateShip! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Possible propaganda bot found, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Borgenland (talk) 12:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

I am sorry. It was a very stupid thing to do, and I will not vandalise. RotatingPirateShip (talk) 12:27, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:조선민주주의인민공화국만세

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:조선민주주의인민공화국만세, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your edit about Orban is hilarious!!!

While I don't condone the continued vandalism of pages relating to the Hungarian election, I must admit that your edit is pretty funny. GrinningIodize (talk) 22:37, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Artemis II. - Adolphus79 (talk) 20:57, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RotatingPirateShip. Thank you for your work on Kuak Hulu. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. The sources are all on the cable car hoax, and there are no sources about the town itself. Please add sources about the town and establish notability as per WP:NTOWN. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 11:34, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RotatingPirateShip. Thank you for your work on Kuak Hulu. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I see that a draft already exists, so I will be nominating it for deletion instead. Please feel free to improve it before it is deleted. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 11:37, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Kuak Hulu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuak Hulu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuak Hulu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei (talk) 11:38, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuak Hulu (May 3)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:

An obvious attempt at a roundabout recreation of the previously rejected and deleted Draft:Kuak SkyRide hoax, given that the actual content about the village seems to be AI-generated and is entirely unsourced, and the only references in the article are the same references that were in the article about the event; which is still WP:SLOWNEWS.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Kuak Hulu to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Athanelar (talk) 16:31, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuak Hulu (May 4)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

Still not meeting the requirements of WP:NPLACE and in any case the previous reviewer's concerns remains extent.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Kuak Hulu to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 10:52, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm UtherSRG. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sperm whale, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 23:22, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bells899. Thank you. Fences&Windows 16:15, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Air Anatolia

It is any editor’s right to dispute a PROD and remove the tag - might I ask why however, especially with a misleading edit summary? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 07:31, 24 May 2026 (UTC)