User talk:Rollinginhisgrave/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Orphaned non-free image File:Myra Waldo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Myra Waldo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Non-English before

Hi Rollinginhisgrave. Your Non-English BEFORE page is really nice, thanks for making that. I have a short list of reliable Colombian sources (mostly newspapers) that I use in exactly the same way while searching, would you be interested in my adding them to your page? No worries if not. GanzKnusper (talk) 10:03, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Ganz, that would be amazing. If you have the energy, I liked how User:Vacant0/Sources set up a separate page that could be linked to to give some details on sources, but simple text strings are also useful. Rollinginhisgrave (talk | edits) 10:32, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok I've gone ahead and added my list. I have thought about putting together something like Vacant0's source page, but I don't feel like I know enough yet to do it properly. One day maybe! GanzKnusper (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Much appreciated. I notice your sources are all newspapers. I know I didn't indicate very well in the lead, but I find reputable magazines are also really good sources to search. Do you know of any for Columbia? Rollinginhisgrave (talk | edits) 10:43, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

All but one, Radio Nacional de Colombia. But now that you mention it yes!, some come to mind - I mostly write about music, so my sources are skewed in that direction. I'll add a link to El Malpensante, which is a well-established cultural journal/magazine. Shock was a music magazine, but they disappeared last year and now their website just redirects to their youtube page (here is an internet archive wayback of how it used to look). The other magazine-ish thing I use as a source is the Boletín Cultural of Banrepcultural - but that's not searchable through Google, they are published online but only as pdf files. My personal favourite source of Colombian music journalism is El Enemigo, but their substack doesn't discuss any editorial policy and i.m.o without that they aren't well-established enough to use as a reliable source. GanzKnusper (talk) 11:01, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

That's great, thankyou again. Hope you find some reporting on El Enemigo that establishes it as reputable, always good to bring in more perspectives. Rollinginhisgrave (talk | edits) 11:48, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Angel food cake is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Angel food cake is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alex26337 -- Alex26337 (talk) 12:47, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary account IP viewer granted

Hello, Rollinginhisgrave. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:03, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Rsjaffe. Rollinginhisgrave (talk | edits) 21:29, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Angel food cake has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Angel food cake has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alex26337 -- Alex26337 (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		I'd like to give you this award for your efforts with the angel food cake article! The article was definitely prepared before the review with minor issues, and I had a fun experience with this being my first review. I hope you will remember the collaboration we shared getting this article to a higher grade, and once again: Thank You; I don't think I can ever say that enough. — Alex26337 (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Alex, glad you enjoyed it. I really appreciate your time, the article is certainly in better shape for having been checked over by you. Rollinginhisgrave (talk | edits) 22:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Chocolate chip cookie is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Chocolate chip cookie is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Snugglebuns -- Snugglebuns (talk) 05:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Chocolate chip cookie has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Chocolate chip cookie has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Snugglebuns -- Snugglebuns (talk) 06:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of S'more is under review

Your good article nomination of the article S'more is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alex26337 -- Alex26337 (talk) 04:41, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of S'more is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article S'more has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alex26337 -- Alex26337 (talk) 04:45, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Neapolitan ragù

Congratulations, Rollinginhisgrave! The article you nominated, Neapolitan ragù, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on The Grand Budapest Hotel

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Grand Budapest Hotel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:59, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Candle salad has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Candle salad has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Snugglebuns -- Snugglebuns (talk) 06:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of S'more has passed

Your good article nomination of the article S'more has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alex26337 -- Alex26337 (talk) 09:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Frozen salad has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Frozen salad has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JustARandomSquid -- JustARandomSquid (talk) 15:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Jumble (cookie) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Jumble (cookie) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Petsquirrel -- Petsquirrel (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Frozen salad

On 14 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frozen salad, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1930s America, you could buy a quart of frozen salad (pictured) for a dollar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frozen salad. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frozen salad), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:02, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Tomato

Tomato has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 2600 etc (talk) 00:47, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Jumble (cookie) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Jumble (cookie) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Petsquirrel -- Petsquirrel (talk) 13:07, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Candle salad

On 22 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Candle salad, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a candle salad (example pictured) was once described as "probably the only arts and crafts project on TV to ever run the risk of being blurred out by the network censors"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Candle salad. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Candle salad), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,637 views (1,469.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:36, 19 February 2026 (UTC) 12:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 March newsletter

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Neapolitan ragù scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Neapolitan ragù has been scheduled as today's featured article for 26 April 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 2026, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 2026. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 23:22, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Time for a PR?

Hi RitG, I hope you're well. I have just put Mince pie up for peer review. If you have time or inclination I'd welcome your thoughts. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 14:51, 1 March 2026 (UTC)