Qshilks

Why did you remove the G15 tag?

Hi, why did you remove the WP:G15 that I had applied to Titra Alpin? The page meets the G15 criteria. --Gurkubondinn 11:13, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

This is a new page landed recently and you put G15 deletion tag. I love to improve new pages insted of deleting them and i am doing this currently and i will make this article ready for main space as i put the under construction tag. Qshilks (talk) 11:20, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes, G15 only applies to new pages. But if you are taking responsibility for this and doing a complete rewrite that is fine with me. But that is no different from deleting the existing page and the rewriting it, because you have to remove all of the AI-generated text anyway. But if this is something that you enjoy doing, then by all means please do it :) I would suggest moving it to draft space first, and then working on it there though. What do you think of that? --Gurkubondinn 11:23, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes. I'm doing my best to remove entire LLM text and rewrite it. Qshilks (talk) 11:28, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Cool, thank you for investing the time and effort to clean this up! --Gurkubondinn 11:46, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

You can make a look to the article (MORE IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED). Qshilks (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Notability and Julian Reade

Hello @Qshilks, and many thanks for delving into the new page Julian Reade. Quite understandably you put 2 tags on this, notability and peacock. Peacock I think I've dealt with, but by all means let me know if anything is still glaring at you. This academic has had a page on German wikipedia for around 8 months and the English got translated over word for word from there earlier this week. The German version, written by an antiquities specialist, was indeed over promotional in tone, so thanks for flagging that. For notability, I think that's more subjective, but I've put some additional content (book reviews mainly, also Reade's work on the mystery tomb in Ur) so I wonder if you could have another look at these updates? My argument would be that under WP:NACADEMIC there are grounds under criteria 1, 3, 6 and 7, given he has an h-index of 48, but I guess that there are arguments against that. There is another source which hasn't been "mined" yet, the Festschrift, which has about a dozen academics talking about Reade and his work, but that's not a quick job to complete. Have the changes so far made enough of a dent in your notability concerns? ChrysGalley (talk) 08:50, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

You have done good work by removing PROMO text and you are welcome to improve the remaining tag Wikipedia:Notability. When it done you can remove the tag but currently this article is not looking notable enough to me. Thank you for your contributions. Qshilks (talk) 06:49, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Maphra

Dear Qshilks, I'd like to kindly ask you to visit Talk:Maphra and answer to my arguments pertaining your speedy deletion claim. Please delete the claim for speedy deletion from the articles page afterwards. Regarding WP:SIGNIFICANCE, you will find that the tag WP:A7 does not apply in this case because the article specifically mentions the ranking in Billboard charts which alone is a criterion of notability (see WP:Singer). Significance also arises from the recognition of the singer by several internationally regarded music magazines (see references).

kind regards--Plumerianer (talk) 09:58, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Donald Trump's birthday for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump's birthday is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump's birthday until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Slatersteven (talk) 11:40, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Qshilks. Thank you for your work on Yami Gautam filmography. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. While the article is entitled "Yami Gautam filmography", the article is almost completely about Yami Gautam herself. Also, since this falls under WP:BLP, please also add footnotes to the biography section. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 12:10, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Stereotypical Name per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stereotypical Name. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  PhilKnight (talk) 11:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)