PrinceAntoineV

July 2025

Hello, I'm Haj. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Frédéric Luz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Haj (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, all information can be found on araucanie-patagonie.org or on French newspaper Sudouest.fr https://www.sudouest.fr/insolite/le-roi-c-est-moi-guerre-des-princes-pour-un-royaume-fantome-24962097.php PrinceAntoineV (talk) 18:03, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Laurent Lafayne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurent Lafayne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurent Lafayne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

D1551D3N7 (talk) 21:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

hello, I have been elected as new Sovereign of the Kingdom of Araucania and Patagonia. You can find articles on this on the French Press quoted on the page PrinceAntoineV (talk) 05:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prince Antoine V d'Araucanie (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Quinntropy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prince Antoine V d'Araucanie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Quinn (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, PrinceAntoineV! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! • Quinn (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)