Ninehundreddollarydoos

September 2021

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dawn Foster, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 12:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2024 Manchester Airport police incident

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Manchester Airport police incident, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophie Rain (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sophie Rain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ninehundreddollarydoos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Lily Phillips, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Launchballer 21:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 Manchester Airport police incident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Manchester Airport police incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Manchester Airport police incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Warning

The next time you remove well-sourced content from Tommy Robinson or any other article without a properly explanatory edit summary, you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 12:57, 27 May 2025 (UTC).

I didn't remove anything - I moved the content of the unnecessary section "New charges" into an already exisiting section of the article where it fit appropriately. Ninehundreddollarydoos (talk) 15:02, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

@Bishonen: There is a misunderstanding here. See my comment on the Talk page. Sweet6970 (talk) 15:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

I see. I guess you didn't notice that Martinevans123 had already restored the text when you put it in a new place, Ninehundreddollarydoos, or that Paul W restored it again after you did? OK, I understand that you meant no harm. (It resulted in the text appearing twice in the article, but I think I've fixed that.) Sweet6970, I've no particular opinion about which of the positions the text should be in — feel free to move it. Bishonen | tålk 15:47, 27 May 2025 (UTC).

Hallo again, Ninehundreddollarydoos. Another user has told me my message immediately above sounds unfriendly to them. I hope it didn't come across like that to you; I, too, meant no harm. Bishonen | tålk 19:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC).

Nomination of Lucy Connolly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucy Connolly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Connolly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul W (talk) 16:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lucy Connolly. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The decision made at the article for deletion discussion was to restore the redirect. You need to respect that decision and stop trying to restore the BLP. I suggest that you use the articles for creation process and try an article about the conviction of Connolly (focused solely on the legal case) rather than frame the article as a biography of a person who does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. Perhaps an article on the legal case will be considered notable. Schazjmd (talk) 14:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)