Naszodia

Your submission at Articles for creation: NM-method has been accepted

NM-method, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:19, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

@Theroadislong:.

Dear Theroadislong,

thank you for the opportunity.

Naszodia (talk) 09:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Naszodia

Thank you for creating Naszodi–Mendonca method.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@SunDawn:.

Dear SunDawn,

thank you for the opportunity.

Naszodia (talk) 09:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Naszodia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:F8BB:87FF:FEF2:73D6 (talk) 11:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Generalized Naszodi--Mendonca method moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Generalized Naszodi--Mendonca method, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Endrabcwizart (talk) 12:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Generalized Naszodi-Mendonca method moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Generalized Naszodi-Mendonca method, is not suitable as written to remain published. Other than the fact that there is no indication of notability, it appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Vera Alpar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vera Alpar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not move this into the main article space, when it clearly isn't ready to be published.

In any case, you appear to have created this by copypasting from User:AVN123456789/sandbox, which is a Very Bad Idea; please don't do that again.

Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Generalized Naszodi-Mendonca method (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia articles need independent secondary sources, there appear to be none here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Generalized Naszodi-Mendonca method and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 07:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Naszodia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 07:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Naszodia! Your additions to Draft:Generalized Naszodi-Mendonca method have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 11:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks for the detailed explanation. Naszodia (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: GNM-method (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not quite enough independent, significant coverage listed to show why this is notable enough for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GNM-method and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:GNM-method

Hello, Naszodia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GNM-method, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: GNM-method (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the bold needs to be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GNM-method and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:50, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Naszodia. Thank you for your work on Generalized Naszodi-Mendonca method. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page on a statistical approach. There were some formatting issues related to the use of bold and the formatting of citation, something worth reviewing as you build more articles. There's an argument that the topic would be better discussed in the context of NM-method, so you may wish to consider merging these pages.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 06:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

@Klbrain: Thank you for your note. The link to the page Generalized Naszodi-Mendonca method has been shared with many social scientists. Therefore, I prefer not to move it or merge it. Thank you for your understanding. Naszodia (talk) 07:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Judit Lannert

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Judit Lannert, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm Kovcszaln6. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Judit Lannert, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also see WP:NPOV. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Please clarify what parts should be supported by a "relyable source"? I edited the cite using information directly from Judit Lannert, who will become the minister of educaton and children in Hungary in the Magyar-government. (Previously the proposed name for the ministry was "children and education" but the acronym of the Hungarian name is prefererd to be OGYM, rather than GYOM). Naszodia (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Dear Kovcszaln6, the committee hearing for Judit Lannert, the nominee for the position of Minister of Education and Children, may take place as early as 11 May (see: https://index.hu/belfold/2026/05/07/kormanyalakitas-magyar-peter-tisza-part-orszaggyules-koztarsasagi-elnok-bizottsagi-meghallgatas-gulyas-gergely/).

In light of this, I kindly ask you—if possible—to review the accuracy of the information on the Wikipedia page (HU, EN, DE) I have edited. If any statements require additional verification or supporting sources, please let me know, and I will provide them promptly. Many Thx. Naszodia (talk) 18:39, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

The "Personal life" section was unsourced; secondary and independent sources would be the best. Also, She is deeply committed to supporting child‑centred, equitable, and creativity‑enhancing learning. Her mission is to make high‑quality care, education, and support accessible to all children—regardless of their place of residence, family background, or life circumstances. is absolutely un-encyclopedic and far from neutral. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 12:24, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Source for the info "Judit Lannert is the mother of 3" under section "Personal life": In her PhD thesis (see page 18, https://phd.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/86/1/lannert_judit.pdf ) "Hálás vagyok családomnak... A legnagyobb köszönet azonban apósomat illeti, aki ebben az igazán nehéz és kicsit hosszúra sikerült periódusban gyermekeimet, különösen a legkisebbiket értőn gondozta." (In English: "I am grateful to my family… My greatest thanks, however, go to my father‑in‑law, who, during this very difficult and somewhat prolonged period, took caring and understanding care of my children, especially my youngest.")

The reference to "my youngest" (=legkisebbik) implies that she has at least three children. In fact, she has exactly 3 children.

Regarding the statement: "She is deeply committed to supporting child‑centred, equitable, and creativity‑enhancing learning. Her mission is to make high‑quality care, education, and support accessible to all children—regardless of their place of residence, family background, or life circumstances." Similar mission‑style descriptions appear on other politicians' Wikipedia pages. For example, the Hungarian Wikipedia page of Hillary Clinton states: "Hillary azért szállt síkra, hogy világszerte minél nagyobb figyelmet kapjanak az emberi jogok, ezen belül is a nők egyenlősége és a gyermekvédelem." (In English: "Hillary has advocated for greater global attention to human rights, particularly women's equality and child protection.") Naszodia (talk) 17:36, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

That's original research, which is not allowed. We would need a source to explicitly state that.

That doesn't justify going against policy. Unfortunately, the Hungarian Wikipedia is in quite a bad condition. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Do you mind changing the section "Personal life" to

== Magánélete ==

Családos.

? Naszodia (talk) 18:07, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

I've added that. Thank you. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Could you pls add the same sentence to the "stable" Hungarian version of the site here: https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lannert_Judit&stable=1  ? Or is there a chance to replace once https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lannert_Judit&stable=1 with https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lannert_Judit&stable=0&redirect=no  ? Naszodia (talk) 04:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't edit on the Hungarian Wikipedia; that's the job of patrollers. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:GNM-method

Hello, Naszodia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "GNM-method".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 20 June 2026 (UTC)