Narym2025

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Siberian Tatars, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello, I'm Mellk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ket people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 05:48, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Siberian Tatars, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. --Altenmann >talk 02:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 10:57, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Your edit to Kurdak-Sargat Tatars has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The4lines |||| (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

I've noticed you keep reverting this paragraph on this article , I've checked the source and there's no mention of the clans that are mentioned. The no original research is an important policy of Wikipedia, please do not revert or change the content without citing verifiable sources. LothofOrkney (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add external links to the same paper into numerous articles, like you did, e.g., here. This looks like a promotion of Nikolai Tomilov. If there is something useful in this paper, please add information into the corresponding Wikipedia article. --Altenmann >talk 17:58, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Tobol Tatars moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tobol Tatars. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:31, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yeniseian peoples have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. The source says she's Evenki, and that's a better picture anyway.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:46, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm M Imtiaz. I noticed that you recently removed content from Khakas without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 19:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

@M Imtiaz: The removal was correct: whoever added the text did not read the cited sources carefully. I fixed the article. However you are right: removal of a text with referenced must always be explained, because it always looks suspicious. --Altenmann >talk 19:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

@Altenmann Thanks. I looked at the snippet that was quoted from one of the sources and I got the impression that a name used until Soviet times might still be validly listed as an alternative one in the lede, but I'm happy to have been corrected. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 19:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tobol Tatars (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aesurias was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tobol Tatars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aesurias (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Category:Indigenous peoples of the Subarctic

Please do not add peoples to the category not coonfirmed by sources. --Altenmann >talk 14:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tobol Tatars (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ktkvtsh were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tobol Tatars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Narym2025! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tobol Tatars (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The last declines have been for insufficient sourcing. This new submission only has a picture added since the previous decline. No new or changed sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tobol Tatars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello, I'm Replayful. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Greenlandic language have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please do not reinsert the YouTube link. If you want to argue why it should be there, you should consider opening a discussion on the talk page. //Replayful (talk | contribs) 11:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

urums aren't crimean tatars

you can keep reverting the idiotic wikipedia page buddy history and facts wouldn't change. ~2026-27681-74 (talk) 10:13, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

• I know that Urums aren't Crimean Tatars. If you would have looked more carefully you would realise that I wasn't the user who reverted you. Narym2025 (talk) 12:39, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Please note that your edits to Crimean Tatars on 8 May breached WP:3RR, a bright-line policy. There will be no sanctions as this was several days ago and blocks are preventative, not punitive, but please bear in mind that "this content is incorrect" is not an exception to 3RR in the future. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:26, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Flags in infoboxes

Please stop inserting, and reverting to reinsert, flags into infoboxes. This is against the manual of style as documented in MOS:INFOBOXFLAG. Canterbury Tail talk 00:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Again you are continuing to reinsert flags into the infoboxes against the MOS. This is considered disruptive editing. If you continue this line of editing you will be blocked for your deliberate disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 19:36, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Mayfung

You seems to be adding false information to the page please don’t do this ~2026-29745-69 (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your recent edits/revisions on Giray Dynasty

Hi Narym2025! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of an article. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. signed, A Random Hylian (Parry)(swing) 16:05, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

• The user I am arguing with seems to be a sockpuppet. Accounts Turkishh and Iraqi turks seem to be his. Narym2025 (talk)

May 2026

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Sofia Gubaidulina. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Please explain why you think that we should include two less specific links instead. Plus, it's against MOS:OVERLINK to link "Poland". Thanks, Thedarkknightli (talk) 16:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ket people, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:59, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:16, 17 June 2026 (UTC)