skeletal diagrams with unresolved issues

edit

Hi! I appreciate that you're putting my diagrams on pages, but please wait until issues brought up on the Project Dinosaurs image review page are resolved. Thanks! P2N2222A (talk) 04:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you removed an illustration of Aristosuchus as being inaccurate, could you point out how so it can be modified? FunkMonk (talk) 19:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reply! It isn't super inaccurate, however, the neck is slightly shrink-wrapped compared to other Compsognathids with preserved soft tissues. I would also recommend making the thorax of the illustration more robust like the thorax of Sinosauropteryx. Finally, I'd reposition the tail so the bump halfway through the tail gets flattened out, since I doubt the tail could make that posture without breakage. Montanoceratops (talk) 00:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Should be easy to fix, will have a look tomorrow. I already made the arms stubbier, which seemed the most obvious error (as compsognathids may not even be a natural group, phylogenetic bracketing might have some shortcomings). FunkMonk (talk) 03:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've added some further tweaks. FunkMonk (talk) 21:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orientantius has been accepted

edit
Orientantius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lagerstätte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moscovian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lagerstätte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham county.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on List of lagerstätten

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of lagerstätten, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on List of lagerstätten

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of lagerstätten, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:21, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Belle plains formation

edit

hello according to you,the belle plains formation now belongs to the petrolia formation,what paper says this,link? Themanguything (talk) 02:21, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

https://store.beg.utexas.edu/publications/report-of-investigations/ri0170
this paper here. @SeismicShrimp is currently working on a more indepth discussion on the stratigraphy Montanoceratops (talk) 03:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
also, if you want a copy of the actual paper itself i have a PDF I am more than happy to send Montanoceratops (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
PDF, I fleshed out the fauna of the petrolia formation and I want to see what sites are attributed to what formation,so I can look back and make for certain the animals I put in the petrolia formation actually belonged there
several of them came from "tit mountain" which was assigned to belle plains and now belle plains is Petrolia. I just to look at that paper and be darn certain. Themanguything (talk) 03:24, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
If you have a discord or email I can send the file to you, I would also advise looking at User:SeismicShrimp/sandbox4 this page, which has additional information Montanoceratops (talk) 03:35, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
moorejackson935
gmail Themanguything (talk) 11:45, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
send the PDF to my Gmail, it moorejackson935 with the @.gmail.com Themanguything (talk) 19:45, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Should be sent to your email! Montanoceratops (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply