MisawaSakura
Welcome!
editHi MisawaSakura! I noticed your contributions to User talk:Pythoncoder and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:
Happy editing! guninvalid (talk) 05:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi MisawaSakura. Thank you for your work on Kerstin Grebäck. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:BIO. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Very sorry to see you have retired
editI've just seen, MisawaSakura, that you have retired from Wikipedia. I hope you will reconsider as in the relatively short time you have participated, you have contributed many interesting articles about your native Japan and more recently biographies of women pool players in connection with Women in Red. You seem to have been upset by one of your articles being refused by a reviewer. I don't think you should take this too seriously, especially as so many of your articles have been accepted. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help you along. In any case, thank you for all your efforts. I will certainly not forget you.--Ipigott (talk) 10:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Can I add to the sentiment above. Over the last 6 months you have been industrious and helpful generally, and have become a stalwart at TFA Requests. There in particular your inputs will be missed. In fact I came here initially to sound you out about becoming a little more formally part of the TFA process. I thought that it might be the sort of thing that you might enjoy. If you should change your mind about retiring, please give me a ping - that would make my day. (And you may relate to my early self-reflective essay, or you may not.) In any event, many thanks for your recent inputs, and take care of yourself. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ipigott & Gog the Mild, be aware that this editor's contributions were rejected because it was found they were publishing plagiarized articles written by WP:LLMs. If you're interested in helping with the clean up, their contributions are going to have to be checked for fabricated references and other hallucinations. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for bringing this up, Thebiguglyalien. I positively reviewed quite a number of the short women's biographies created by this editor. To me, they seemed to be based on acceptable sources and contained sufficient evidence of notability. Furthermore, this editor was able to create a considerable number of women's biographies, latterly in connection with Women in Sport, Women in Red's annual focus for 2026. Is there any firm evidence that the use of LLMs is not acceptable? Some of us, including Rosiestep believe that if used carefully, AI assistance can in fact be helpful in improving the quality of articles. I'm therefore not at all convinced that a clean-up operation is called for. Are you able to provide any clear evidence of cases in which LLMs have caused problems requiring attention in these biographies?--Ipigott (talk) 09:17, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to hear about the retirement of MisawaSakura and that there are issues with some of their articles. For clarification and transparency regarding Ipigott's mention of my belief
that if used carefully, AI assistance can in fact be helpful in improving the quality of articles
, note that my academic research experiment, now in the analysis stage, focuses on using an AI agent to expand a lead paragraph of an article I've created incorporating only the content in the article, and without introducing additional information, references, hallucinations, or slop. And, of course, the Edit Summary indicates the use of an AI agent in that edit. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:18, 2 February 2026 (UTC) - The WP:LLM page I linked explains the issues that are inherent to this technology, and as of November creating articles using LLM content is sanctionable in itself per WP:NEWLLM. If sheer number of created articles is an important metric for you and you support the inclusion of LLM content, then there's already a separate project for that at Grokipedia. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 19:18, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to hear about the retirement of MisawaSakura and that there are issues with some of their articles. For clarification and transparency regarding Ipigott's mention of my belief
- Thank you for bringing this up, Thebiguglyalien. I positively reviewed quite a number of the short women's biographies created by this editor. To me, they seemed to be based on acceptable sources and contained sufficient evidence of notability. Furthermore, this editor was able to create a considerable number of women's biographies, latterly in connection with Women in Sport, Women in Red's annual focus for 2026. Is there any firm evidence that the use of LLMs is not acceptable? Some of us, including Rosiestep believe that if used carefully, AI assistance can in fact be helpful in improving the quality of articles. I'm therefore not at all convinced that a clean-up operation is called for. Are you able to provide any clear evidence of cases in which LLMs have caused problems requiring attention in these biographies?--Ipigott (talk) 09:17, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ipigott & Gog the Mild, be aware that this editor's contributions were rejected because it was found they were publishing plagiarized articles written by WP:LLMs. If you're interested in helping with the clean up, their contributions are going to have to be checked for fabricated references and other hallucinations. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Hachikō is 
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Monkeysmashingkeyboards -- Monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Hachikō has 
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Monkeysmashingkeyboards -- Monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Professional pool governance dispute (2022–2025) (February 13)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Professional pool governance dispute (2022–2025) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, MisawaSakura!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CostalCal (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2026 (UTC) |
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
edit| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive |  |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
Wikipedia Asian Month 2025 Golden Barnstar
edit
Betty2407 (talk) 08:38, 6 June 2026 (UTC) on behalf of Wikipedia Asian Month User Group
Invitation to WPID
editI've started User:Larry Sanger/WikiProject Intellectual Diversity, a group of editors working to recover fair decision-making, genuine neutrality, transparent governance, and public accountability on Wikipedia—all through established on-wiki processes (RfCs, Village Pump, noticeboards, talk pages). We now have twenty members and counting, including several deeply experienced editors. If these goals interest you, have a look at the project page and consider signing up. We could use your help. Larry Sanger (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2026 (UTC)