Welcome!

edit

Hello, MaskedHarbinger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to ERAP1. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Help is available: check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask your mentor via your user homepage, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Hamimh2 (talk) 22:35, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026

edit

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sharad Pawar, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:HEAD. CodeTalker (talk) 02:33, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the feedback and I've read how section headings are supposed to be capitalized. I'll do Sentence Case instead of Title Case from hereon. However, I'm reimplementing my changes to the introduction by reformatting a confusing run-on sentence. MaskedHarbinger (talk) 02:48, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Trehero (May 13)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Cosmic840, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
see WP:BIO.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:John Trehero to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

~ŤheŴubṂachine-840✒️ 21:18, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, MaskedHarbinger! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840✒️ 21:18, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Hackerspace

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hackerspace, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on HeatSync Labs

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page HeatSync Labs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:SoundBioLogo.jpg

edit
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SoundBioLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Harlem Biospace moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Harlem Biospace, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:01, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Harlem Biospace moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Harlem Biospace. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and require WP:RS, WP:IS. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 04:50, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate article creation

edit

Hello MaskedHarbinger, Please stop creating multiple articles on the same subject, as you have done with Draft:Harlem Biospace and Draft:Harlem Biospace (company), and instead concentrate on developing a single article that complies with Wikipedia requirements. QEnigma 04:57, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I didn't do that. I created Harlem Biospace through clicking a red link. Then, Dan arndt moved it into draftspace as it wasn't complete at the time. I didn not create Harlem Biospace(company). MaskedHarbinger (talk) 05:51, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biodidact (May 23)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Accepting this is a stub, nevertheless it requires evidence of notability to meet WP:NORG. This is often very difficult to meet, and at the moment none of the sources do that. Hence the reason why it was moved to draft space, the idea being that in draft mode the sources can be improved. At the moment it has the same sources as were present when draftification was done. The COVID stories give very little cover of the lab in NORG terms and the LA Daily Post articles are not giving that significant coverage of the lab itself, they address more one particular aspect of the lab.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Biodidact to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Mydas fulvifrons

edit
Warning icon

The page Mydas fulvifrons has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 01:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply