Louisblack
![]() |
Hi Louisblack! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC) |
April 2019
edit
Hello, I'm Shesaplumper. I noticed that you recently removed content from Walden University without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shesaplumper (talk) 23:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Walden University, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Shesaplumper (talk) 23:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Shesaplumper (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Walden University. Shesaplumper (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. March 2021
edit
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Pete Buttigieg. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 00:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Important Notice
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Louisblack. Thank you for your work on Western Association of Schools and Colleges - Senior College and University Commission. Another editor, Kudpung, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
I have removed the non-existent categories. Please add existing ones. Proof may be required of the authorship and ownership of the copyright of the organisation'slogo
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Replaceable non-free use File:Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science main building, Willowbrook, California.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science main building, Willowbrook, California.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
edit
Hi Louisblack! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -- Reconrabbit 18:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Historically Black Graduate Institutions
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Historically Black Graduate Institutions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions.
🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 22:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Re: Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities
edit
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Hispanic-Serving Institution#HACU. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.
Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 06:23, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- An update here: I reverted the changes based on feedback. I
havebelieve [added 21:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)] that this page does not meet the standards of notability to have a standalone article. Please consider finding more reliable sources with significant coverage to address notability. If not, this page may be deleted, merged or redirected through the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion process. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 07:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC) - Just to reinforce this, I've found some sources but they could still be challenged regarding independence. If you have some, or know where to find them, please add them. Thanks. --Northernhenge (talk) 11:35, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

The article Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is not reliably sourced, meaning notability can't be determined. It is also written in a promotional tone.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 11WB (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Ways to improve Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander - Serving Institutions
editHello, Louisblack,
Thank you for creating Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander - Serving Institutions.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Orphan: Please link other relevant Wikipedia articles back to this article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Concern regarding Draft:Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities
edit
Hello, Louisblack. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities
edit
Hello, Louisblack. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Western Association of Schools and Colleges - Senior College and University Commission for deletion
editThe article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Association of Schools and Colleges - Senior College and University Commission until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.