Kirnod Skuaita
May 2026
edit
Hello, I'm Plasticwonder. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Malaysian United Party have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 02:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malaysian United Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 02:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Kirnod Skuaita disruptive edits, belligerent behaviour. Haute-Spatio (talk) 00:47, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Malaysian United People's Party, you may be blocked from editing. Malgosha (talk) 00:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —C.Fred (talk) 11:55, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
edit
Hello, Kirnod Skuaita. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Malaysian United Indigenous Party, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:
- Avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors
- Disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI)
- Propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions
- Avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming)
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Since you hold yourself out on your talk page as being a member of this party, you must abide by the COI rules with any edits you make related to MUIP. You also need to be very cautious when editing the articles of other Malaysian political parties. —C.Fred (talk) 12:00, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
edit
(Non-administrator comment) You've been given a temporary block, to give you time to read through the warnings you've received and understand why your actions were disrupting Wikipedia. If you've been given a post with blue text, there's an important page that you should read in order to fully understand what's going on.
Please start by reading this essay before you do anything else, because I think this is going to be the most important thing you need to understand about Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is a community-driven project that's almost entirely powered by volunteers. We have to get on with each other in order for this encyclopedia to work - if we attack and are rude to each other, everything would grind to a halt and stop functioning.
That's why Wikipedia is built on five central pillars - five things that are so important, so fundamental to the heart of Wikipedia that everybody must follow them without exception.
I feel that the most important pillar is Civility; all editors must be polite and cordial to each other, even when we disagree. If someone is being rude, do not be rude back. If they are angry, do not get angry too. Always try to be the better person and treat everybody here with respect - if you are respectable, then your arguments will be respected. If you cannot respect other editors, they have no reason to respect the point you are trying to make. It will be overshadowed by disrespect and that will be all anyone else can focus on.
There will be times where you don't get your way, even if you are absolutely sure that you're right. This happens to every editor, that's just how this website works. We decide what goes onto this website through consensus, so it's really, really important to learn when to leave a discussion/article and move on to doing something else instead - this is something that everybody should learn for their own health and wellbeing, as well as that of others.
I hope you return to editing Wikipedia when the ban expires, but only if you can understand what's happened here and why. Read the policies and guidelines that you've been given, learn how Wikipedia works and do your absolute best to make sure that none of this ever happens again. That's all we want from you - work with us, not against us. In solidarity, Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 15:40, 12 June 2026 (UTC)