Jeraxmoira

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Jeraxmoira, I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Request of Review

Hi dragon @Jeraxmoira, you moved the article Draft:GreenAir to the draft space. I have heavily rewritten it. Can you review it, please? Thanks, Hegesinus (talk) 07:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your contributions, Jerax! i am happy to see you.

Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Question regarding Draft:Takhteshwar_Temple

Could you expand on why you draftified Draft:Takhteshwar_Temple? There appear to be multiple sources (based on a quick WP:BEFORE search) that push it over the brink of notability. Am I missing something here? Sohom (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sohom Datta, please see Wikipedia:Drafts#During_new_page_review. There's no point in having an article with tour/travel company listings that are not WP:RS. Almost none of the information was verifiable in reliable sources that were cited in the article, making it unfit for the mainspace. WP:BEFORE is only for AfDs. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

I do see your point here, but I'd personally say travel guide listings are in fact RS for a place that is primarily known for it's tourism. Also, while you do point out that the policies as currently written do not explicitly ask you to perform a BEFORE search, I do think performing a BEFORE search before taking a content action that could potentially result in a article being deleted is a good idea in general. Sohom (talk) 04:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Travel/ tour company listings are not reliable for information on architecture, significance or the origins of a location/ temple's name. They can be used for uncontroversial claims, i.e. location, coordinates etc,. SEO optimized travel websites that copy content to rank high on Google are not reliable sources.

In this case, a before search was not needed as I did not nominate it for deletion. I'm sorry, but it is not the responsibility of NPRs to find sources while patrolling new articles, as this would take up a lot of time for what I believe is an unimportant/ low-interest topic. Regarding your deletion concern, the article was moved to the draftspace. Even if it hadn't been, any editor who nominates the article will have to do their own before search. If the subject is indeed notable, it will not be nominated. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I hadn't looked at the history, I had assumed you were talking about my book sources. I'd agree that the sources you removed were unreliable.

However, I'm sorry, but it is not the responsibility of NPRs to find sources while patrolling new articles, as this would take up a lot of time for what I believe is an unimportant/ low-interest topic. is an absurd claim to make. The whole point of NPR is to make judgement calls on the notability of subject which inherently require a BEFORE check. Also, you do realize that draft deletions are automatic right, if the draft sits for six months in draftspace? I can understand using draftspace to quickly move obviously underdeveloped pages off off mainspace, however, this page was > 1 month old. The way I would have dealt with the article would have been to remove the unreliable sources, done a BEFORE check and then tagged it {{more references needed}} (or AFDed it if I had determined that RS did not exist). Sohom (talk) 10:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

The claim you called absurd is followed day in and day out by new page reviewers. I believe that is also a reason why we have the It needs more sources to establish notability option in the MoveToDraft script. Mainspace articles can be moved to draft with a valid reason until they are more than 90 days old. We also have Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 to restore drafts that have been deleted. I will not be replying further as my explanations above address the concerns you raised. Cheers Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I find your rationale and thought process troubling to say the least. I will bring this up at WT:NPPR for further discussion. However, we can agree to disagree for this thread :( Sohom (talk) 11:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

References

Eashvar Karthic

It is clear that you created this because he directed two films. However, Zebra never released and he is not notable yet. DareshMohan (talk) 07:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

FWIW, it was not created because he directed two films. Is there any particular guideline/policy that explicitly says directors with only one film are not deemed notable? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals #3 The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a film). Calling Penguin a well known work is a stretch.

If you are trying for #1 The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors;, it is doubtful if an assistant professor at American College, Madurai counts as being widely cited. If the film won a national or international award for the director, then one film can be excused. DareshMohan (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Eashvar Karthic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eashvar Karthic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eashvar Karthic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 22:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Paid editing?

Hi Jeraxmoira, I made some edits to trim puffery from Moksha Kalyanram Abhiramula and I noticed that you had marked the other article created by the same editor as possible WP:UPE. I'm not sure what evidence there is for this, but you might want to take a look at this article as well and see if should also be flagged as possible UPE? Thanks. Melcous (talk) 11:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Melcous. My concern was that there was a source that was published on the same day the article was also created, 25 June. The article also used the same image from the source. It's highly unlikely for a single-purpose account to create an article with a source published on the same day, which made me think it was UPE. Sadly, there is no actual way to prove this unless this SPA goes back to their previous editing pattern or recreates a deleted article. The sources on Moksha Kalyanram Abhiramula are all biography listings, primary sources, and press releases. I'll do a WP:BEFORE and nominate it for deletion when I get some time. Thank you for the ping Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Chidananda S Naik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chidananda S Naik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chidananda S Naik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Best to make such articles as AfC drafts. DareshMohan (talk) 07:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Ameena

Hi @Jeraxmoira, Actually i wanted to know how to find reliable sources for every change. Can you please help me with editing the same Ameena (film) Powershell17 (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Powershell17, please see reliable sources and applying reliability guidelines. I did a search myself and I am not able to find many reliable sources/ reviews post-release. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:28, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is SPA at Talk:Gurbaksh Chahal. Thank you. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Doubt

Per WP:THREE and the fact that one of your journal articles mentioned this film , wouldn't you also consider Raghu Samarth to be notable? DareshMohan (talk) 21:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Are you saying Raghu Samarth is not notable? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

I think he is (if interviews are notable). Sorry if I was on bad terms earlier. I initially had a different perception of WP:Director in terms of number of films. DareshMohan (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

David Weild IV

Hi. Why you reverted my edit? Indiana's Football (talk) 06:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Indiana's Football, there was no G7 tag on the deletion discussion when you removed the AfD notice from the article. You should not remove the AfD notice before the discussion is closed or deleted. There is also a bot that adds back the AfD notice if it is removed before a discussion is closed or deleted. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Understood. As i violated I violated WP:ZEALOUS, WP:DOUBT instead of improve the article I hope I will not get restricted? I am sorry Indiana's Football (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	I just can’t thank you enough for your work on David Yong—I was shocked to see ya pick up on it just before it was deleted (G13), and even more shocked that it became an article! I forgot about that draft for a while and it came as a thankful surprise to see ya work on it. Thanks for all your effort you put into it, I appreciate it—a lot! :) ~ Tails Wx 00:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Tails Wx. It was all you though; I only expanded it a little. And I often go through G13 for potential drafts and I am glad David Yong caught my eye :D Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

SoundExchange COI template

Hi! Why did you remove the COI template over at SoundExchange? Sure, the talkpage is full of COI edit requests but large parts of the article were also written by COI editors (or people who just get super enthousiastic thinking about these music royalty distribution systems, which is the same thing). Polygnotus (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Also, wyvern or dragon what do you prefer and why. Polygnotus (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

What's the pointing of having maintenance tags when you are addressing the issues? I assumed you were already fixing it. If not, I'll look into it once you are done.

I call wyverns dragons as well and its just an inclination to mythical creatures. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Cleanup templates (hopefully) attract the kind of people this article desperately needs. I am addressing some of the many many issues, but I have a wife and a mortgage, I can't give this terrible article all of my attention while there are millions of other articles that also desperately need attention. https://i.redd.it/kn6eetctyle91.jpg Polygnotus (talk) 21:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jeraxmoira. Thank you for your work on Mauricio Vidal. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 22:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1M1B

Can you kindly remove the SPA tag you have inappropriately and improperly placed on my comment? The SPA tagging section clearly states that the tag should only be used on pages that relate to the single-purpose account's "single purpose". If I was a SPA, it would be on the John Lennon topic area, since most of my edits are from there. I have made no edits even remotely pertaining to the 1M1B organisation outside of the Afd discussion. Whoareuagain (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

An article you draftified is now at AfD

You may wish to visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodagu University and decide whether you wish to leave an opinion for or against retention 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Please review this Article

Hello Mr Jeraxmoira Could you please review and accept this article Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars Thank You Amanatadverse17 (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Amanatadverse17, the draft still does not have enough independent sources and many paragraphs are unsourced. I suggest that you focus on improving existing articles rather than creating your own until you have a better understanding of how referencing works. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:46, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Review

Mr. Jeraxmoira I would like you to review this draft Manish Kashyap Thank You. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 05:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I have replied above. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

CSD G5s

Hello, Jeraxmoira,

I untagged a few of the pages you tagged for CSD G5 speedy deletion. Please examine each page before you tag it for deletion because not all of these articles, redirects and drafts met the G5 criteria. One article was in the middle of an article merger and I don't think speedy deletion takes priority over that. Another page had been part of a previous merge and I believe we need to retain it for attribution purposes. Also, the page creator has to be a confirmed sockpuppet, not just an editor listed on an open SPI report and has to be the sole or primary contributor to an article. Several articles you tagged had substantial contributions from several other editors so these articles weren't eligible for CSD G5. Please review WP:G5 to better understand the exact conditions that need to be in place for the G5 criteria to be valid.

But thank you for all of your contributions to the project, your patrolling is appreciated! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

A tool

Hi Jeraxmoira, I've been following the COIN discussion about Saqib and noticed your question about when a deleted draft was created. I suggest installing User:SD0001/deleted-metadata-link which is what Saqib used to provide the data. It can be quite helpful when researching socks/UPE. S0091 (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi S0091, Thank you for the message. I am aware of the tool, but it didn't show up on that particular draft. That's why I wanted an admin to look at it. On a separate note, when I get the time, I'll send you an email regarding Prateek Raj's AfC. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Sometimes you have to switch to source editor for the link to show up. S0091 (talk) 14:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

DYK for A. Sreekar Prasad filmography

On 3 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A. Sreekar Prasad filmography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A. Sreekar Prasad filmography. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, A. Sreekar Prasad filmography), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 03:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sri Ganesh has been accepted

Sri Ganesh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 07:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maita Sanchez

Hello! Your submission of Maita Sanchez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

BlueMoonset, I have replied there. Thank you for the reminder. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

JeRax

Hi @Jeraxmoira,

just curious. Are you JerAx or affiliated with him in some way? Your username just made me wonder.

Cheers, Bremps... 04:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Bremps, I was expecting someone to ask this sooner or later, haha. JerAx is a very popular player in the Dota 2 esports scene and my username was partially inspired by his in-game name. I used to play Dota 2 during my school days. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Ahh okay. Good day/night! Bremps... 05:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

For your knowledge

I edited Wikipedia previously under the username User:Otolemur crassicaudatus and User:NGC 2736. And no, I am not paid editor and I don't use any sockpuppet. CometVolcano (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Article request

C. Prem Kumar Director of 3 films, cinematographer of 6. DareshMohan (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Someone has already created it. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Quick draftifications

Good morning,

I noticed that today you moved a page to draft space 5 minutes after it was created. You also moved Draft:Mustafa Hills 36 minutes after it was created. Please be aware that WP:NPPHOUR is considered a best practice that NPP members are generally expected to follow. Pages are allowed to be worked on in main space and moving pages to draft space too quickly, before a user has a chance to complete it. These types of quick draftifies may be considered WP:BITEy behaviour and may push new contributors away, which is why we typically give them at least an hour since the last productive edit. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks a lot IQR IQR (talk) 13:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I shouldn’t have done it, but the author’s talk page history and contributions implied that they weren’t trying to address the issues with the articles they had created earlier. I will keep the WP:NPPHOUR in mind. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

It may imply it, but the way I view it, a new user may be taking the time to try to figure something out and reading elsewhere. Reference formatting wasn't easy for me early on, so I was reading help pages figuring out the proper syntax for an hour or so. Never hurts to assume good faith and give someone a bit of extra time, it may help keep a potentially good contributor around longer ;) Hey man im josh (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Jeraxmoira! I wanted to check back in with you regarding quick draftifications as I saw that you moved Draft:Ali Raza (actor) to the draft space less than 40 minutes after the page creator had last edited it. Please keep in NPPHOUR in mind as you work. It looks like you are usingMPGuy2824's MoveToDraft, which should warn you if the article has been edited within the past hour. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

I wouldn't call it quick, as Munch03 had an hour after creating the article, yet they chose to create more unreferenced articles instead of improving the existing one. They are also linked to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunuraju. It's just a bold move nonetheless and AGF shouldn't apply to obvious socks. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Dani Sanchez-Lopez

On 18 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dani Sanchez-Lopez, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dani Sanchez-Lopez wanted to be an actor but switched to cinematography after realizing that actors deliver others' lines? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dani Sanchez-Lopez. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dani Sanchez-Lopez), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Navin Chawla (judge) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navin Chawla (judge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navin Chawla (judge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— hako9 (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

TVK

Sir. This person called Yarohj is adding fake info to TVK page. Marxism is not even there in the citations he added. Please delete that. Vijay or TVK did not say TVK is left wing. It is only said by the news website. Please fix it. He is bringing his political agenda into that page. 2409:4072:6C96:68CF:6F4E:6AE4:BB93:4A69 (talk) 17:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi IP, I am not Jeraxmoira but if there are issues with the article, you need to start a discussion on the article's talk page. However, I will point out Wikipedia goes by what reliable secondary sources state about a subject; not what the subject says about itself. You could be right; I don't know, but be prepared to provide such sources to support your claims or prove the current cited sources do not support the content. S0091 (talk) 17:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

@S0091 I asked to him about proof of Marxism in his page (User talk:Yarohj) that he included. He shows me a opinion of a party spokesperson known by no body. He added opinion of one of spokesperson as a primary ideology of party when the party did not tell that is the ideology. 2409:4072:6C96:68CF:854A:ACE2:C6C9:65DB (talk) 01:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Fahad Shaikh

Hello, this BLP clearly contains unreliable sources and also includes some original research. Yet, you're removing the tags. May I ask why? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

I haven't reviewed the existing sources yet, but the tags were mistakenly removed in the formatting I applied. I've reverted it now. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Murivu

Please move this page back to draft space. It failed AFC review and one of the editor, likely sock of the creator of the same page, moved it to mainspace. RangersRus (talk) 09:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

@RangersRus (talk page watcher) Please make an SPI (Twinkle allows this with ease). You may also wish to avail yourself of the "Draftify" script which allows you to do this with ease, and even with charm!

Meanwhile I will draftily it for you (both) 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

It seems I cannot. The redirect has been fiddled with preventing my moving it back. @RangersRus an alternative is to send it to AfD. Your choice. Or Draft:Murivu can be admin deleted and the article moved back to replace it 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

RangersRus, we already have an SPI open for Rydex64. The main issue here is that we couldn’t find Rydex64's master account, so none of their articles were deleted. I already draftified Murivu on 19 July 2024, so I believe it’s not eligible for draftification again unless someone wants to be WP:BOLD. The other way is to check if there is any overlap between User:ArifVlog782 and Rydex64 (which I’ll take a look at shortly). If overlap is found, we could simply WP:BANREVERT and move it back to draftspace. But, articles about latest Indian films are almost always notable since they typically receive 2-3 full length reviews in local / national news media. From my experience, Wikipedia is more inclined to keep such articles if they pass WP:N, even if they were created by a bad faith editor. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

I agree that film pages should have 2-3 reviews to pass WP:NFILM but this film page does not have any and that is why I declined the draft and asked to add multiple reviews and resubmit again. Now this editor ArifVlog782 not only moved the draft to mainspace but also posted a fake AFC acceptance message. I also suspect canvassing. See how other editor tries to fix the fake acceptance message. RangersRus (talk) 12:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

There is no rush on this, there never is. Please ping me to let me know what you folks are doing, though. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

We know that AFC review policies and guidelines have been violated by moving the page from draft to mainspace and posting a fake acceptance message. Adding @CNMall41: here to see what he makes of this. Will WP:ANI be another approach? RangersRus (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Sorry Jeraxmoira for using your talk page for a conference meeting here lol. RangersRus (talk) 13:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

For now Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DareshMohan is open. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

As far as I know, AFC review policies and guidelines do not prohibit moving an article to the mainspace, even if it was rejected or created by a sock. There is nothing in the guidelines related to fake acceptance messages as well. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Observation

• IMO, also consdiering the timing of the edits, I don't think DareshMohan is involved and the AFC accepting edit was likely just to remove the red link. If needed, DareshMohan could have created or moved the article to the mainspace on his own; I don’t think they would need another account. An editor with 3-4 years of experience would probably not make this rookie mistake.
• User:ArifVlog782 is surely a sock of someone, but IMHO, I don't think they are related to the Rydex64 case. The only overlap here is on the article Murivu. Newly created SPAs/socks usually patrol new pages and dig up old pages/drafts related to other SPI cases, moving them to the mainspace to mislead editors/admins who are trying to find behavioral evidence against them. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

  Timtrent and RangersRus, if my observations make any sense, please consider G7'ing the SPI on DareshMohan. If they don't, then let the SPI run its course, but I strongly believe CU will be denied. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

  I think, for my part, letting it run does no harm, and may bear some fruit. This is despite your observations making sense. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

  DareshMohan with 3 to 4 years of experience, you would expect them to know the difference between an AFC generated acceptance message and the fake one. He could have in good faith told ArifVlog782 that this is not the right way to move a page without AFC's accepted review and reverted the move back. This makes me think of canvas. What you make of it @Timtrent: ? RangersRus (talk) 16:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

  @RangersRus I will let wiser heads than mine judge this. All editors are Abe to make good faith errors. I include myself in this. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Excuse my language but this is a goddam mess. It is likely related to this. Note that a CU will not likely find a strong technical connection due to the SOCK farm's experience in SPI. Give me a few minutes to gather things and I will leave another note here. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

That one has been annoying me for some time. Good luck 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

I do not want to put any more evidence on the SPI page as I know it is already a nightmare for a CU. I will leave it here in the event anyone wants to transfer it over or user ANI as a way to put the brakes on the UPE until the SPI can be figured out. Pinging @Timtrent:, @RangersRus:.

Rydex64 and ArifVlog782 have a connection based on AfC (not to mention similar name stylings with letters followed by numbers – not strong but a little something). User Rydex64 requested to be an AfC reviewer just prior to their block. This would indicate the intention to use AfC as a tool to help move pages with less scrutiny. User ArifVlog782 leaving this AfC message shows that both are familiar with the process and attempting to use it to their advantage.

I am of the belief that these are likely MEAT hired by this firm which has been connected to the StayCalmOnTrees SPI (which I believe will be shown in the SPI filing for the link I shared above on Sunuraju). Note that Sunuraju edited Murivu one day after Rydex64. They are being bold which tells me they are likely being careful to avoid using the same IP based on their previous SPI experience and forgot that behavrioal evidence can be just as good as CU evidence. Rydex64 and Sunuraju have the similar generic userpage message typically left by this farm to avoid the redlinked name and to give the impression they are not an SPA. Editor interaction tool shows an overlap with Sunuraju and Rydex64. When looking at those overlaps, I see edits close to each other and often right after a new page creation which to me indicates they are both coordinating.

Finally, the SPI I linked to above that I recently filed for Sunuraju is going to be connected to a user with 100,000+ edits over the last decade. There is a ton of off-Wiki evidence which was emailed to Wikipedia so waiting on that response. That user has not been outed on Wikipedia as of yet but I think I will do so shortly as their account has been dormant for almost two months and I don’t want it to go past the ability of a CU to gather evidence. For the record, it is not RangersRus and that user has never raised a flag that would indicate I should check their editing history more. Long story short, it is a rabbit hole and I am glad I am not an admin or CU as the rats nest is going to take some time to untangle. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Noted. Nothing further from me. More power to your elbow. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

My elbows are worn out. Been using my knees and they're about to give out as well. sigh --CNMall41 (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Actually, just found the nail. User Sunuraju left a similar AfC acceptance message on the page of Faymas (both users are listed in the SPI). Feel free to take to ANI at this point. I fear that me piling on at SPI is muddying the waters. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Sockfarm

@CNMall41:@Timtrent: Oddly enough three editors together in the span of half an hour created this article. Approval of the draft was asked on my talk page for Draft:Ijaaz Ebrahim (actor), and I think he went on to create the article himself without the (actor) in the name. DareshMohan (talk) 05:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Update: I created Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArifVlog782. These two edits are very fishy to me . Is he publicly declaring his COI? DareshMohan (talk) 05:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Also, after reading Wikipedia:Drafts#Reasons_to_move_an_article_to_draftspace, I feel like taking the article to AfD is best option. DareshMohan (talk) 05:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

@DareshMohan I suspect you are correct. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Dheeraj Sharma (professor)

Thank you for assisting with my edits on Dheeraj Sharma's page and for suggesting that I consult web archives beforehand. I appreciate the extra insight. Charlie (talk) 11:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Socks

Hello, Jeraxmoira,

When you strike the comments of a sock in an AFD could you leave an explanation and also leave your signature? Otherwise, it isn't clear why an editor's comments have been struck out. I mostly usually write "sock strike" and sign my username. Just striking comments raises more questions than necessary if you spend an extra minute to provide an explanation. Thank you for all of your contributions to the project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

I linked the SPI in the edit summary, but I'll keep in mind to sign them in the future. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

About

Someone blocked Saqib with no reason by --Sunuraju (talk) 09:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Sunuraju, I am more concerned about why you are worried about an editor who moved ten of your articles to draftspace and started an SPI against you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

because i found out he was blocked by user left me stunned, should i had appeal to ArbCom or not? i did a lot mistakes in the past as editing in wikipedia and i had grammar issues Sunuraju (talk) 02:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

If I were you, I’d leave it be. Did anyone send you an email or ask you to create articles related to Pakistani television dramas? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

PRIETY MUKUNDHAN

The video of the song is available on youtube for your verification.I hope the reference cited meets your expectation. Tordaddy (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

Hello Jeraxmoira, Regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Deusestlux your deletion of my attempt at a sockpuppet investigation on the Talk page was unhelpful. As I stated on the Talk page, I do not know how to get this into namespace, yet you refer me back to the draft submission - I do not know how to get this into namespace. Could you assist, please - what do I need to do to get this stalled submission going again. 14.2.205.131 (talk) 06:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations is for general discussion and queries related to SPI. The case you started on the talk page has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deusestlux and IPs can edit the individual SPI page. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks for your assistance. Regarding your last message to me, I am aware of the edit war policy, however I have NO preferred version of the article nor have any interest in it, other than trying to keep WP:NOR off WP. Full details can be found at: Talk:Genetic_history_of_Italy#Southern_Italians_are_closest_to_the_Modern_Greeks,_while_Northern_Italians_are_closest_to_Spaniards_and_Southern_French?_WTF? Regards, 14.2.205.131 (talk) 07:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Collab

Wondering if you wanted to help make an article for Ignacio Mateos? DareshMohan (talk) 05:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Sure, I can start a draft in a while. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Jeraxmoira. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Request Regarding Edits to Mr. Arvind Krishna’s Wikipedia Page.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Happy holidays!

	Happy holidays!
	Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Jannatulbaqi, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! :) Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Assist in improving page

Hi Jeraxmoira,I have created a draft called Draft:Nawa Raj Subba I don't knw how to move the draft on mainspace as this is my first Draft. Can you please check and help me to move it on to the mainspace if it is written in a correct way? Thanks Aduri7354 (talk) 16:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Aduri7354, to move an article to the mainspace, click on "More" or "Tools" at the top-right corner of the page and select the "Move" option. Enter the new title and move it to the article namespace. Nawa Raj Subba is not notable and if moved, the article is likely to be deleted. I would suggest you to focus on improving existing articles on Wikipedia. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Can you help me improving the article? Aduri7354 (talk) 00:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

There are no independent sources with significant coverage available to improve the article. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

2025 Utah Wikipedia Day at Sundance Film Festival

WP day cake by Lea-Kim	Utah Wikipedia Day at Park City during Sundance Film Festival  Sat., Feb. 1, 11:00am–4:00pm MT, The Shop, 1167 Woodside Avenue, Park City, UT 84060 We invite you to celebrate Wikipedia's 24th birthday during Sundance. This is one of many Wikipedia Day celebrations. Join us either in person or remotely. Read more: →here←	Egyptian Theatre photo, Frank Schulenburg

21:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from this list, please remove your name from this list.

NPP Awards for 2024

		The New Page Reviewer's NPP Barnstar Award
		This award is given in recognition to Jeraxmoira for conducting 104 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Vikas Sivaraman

Hello @Jeraxmoira, I tried to create an article for Vikas Sivaraman, and while doing so, I noticed that a draft has already been created by you. If you don’t mind, may I complete the page Draft:Vikas Sivaraman? A quick Google search suggests that he is quite notable. Garvitpandey1522 (talk) 10:59, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Aymara script

Hey @Jeraxmoira, I've seen you have tagged Aymara script with R2, but you have created the page, not csd tagged it. I had moved the page to draftspace without leaving a redirect (page mover perms). Just thought to inform you. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mistletoe-alert. Thank you. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 10:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Celeste Mellet

I noticed that you did a major upgrade on the references of the Celeste Mellet page. Thank you for that; I appreciate it. Unfortunately, I suck at tech. My excuse is my age, not being a digital native, which is why your work properly formatting the references was necessary in the first place. I would appreciate if you could now move the page over from draft to real life, as my attempts at doing so have failed to this point. Thank you. Matza Pizza (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Nevermind! I got it.

That doesn't change the fact that I appreciate your work there. Thank you!

Matza Pizza (talk) 12:39, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Arunattu velallar

Moved to Talk:Arunattu Vellalar § Arunattu velallar

 – Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:22, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Help

I think I successfully moved the paged to my drafts. Should we fully delete it? Also I'm not sure why an admin removed CompoSecure from Centurion Card and Palladium Card. Could you explain this to me? Mistletoe-alert (talk) 20:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

I have reverted your move as articles in AfD discussion shouldn't be moved to draft. You did not cite a reliable source when you added CompoSecure's involvement in Centurion Card and Palladium Card, so it was removed. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

I know Compo sponsored the WSJ article, but what about Robb Report? Mistletoe-alert (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

https://robbreport.com/lifestyle/news/luxury-credit-cards-metal-1234619455/ Mistletoe-alert (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Discuss article related content on the article's talk page please. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:28, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Super unnecessary—and emblematic of what I called you out on—adding the thing to my talk page. Mistletoe-alert (talk) 00:03, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

You posted on my talk page at 20:10, I posted on yours at 20:12 and I replied to you here at 20:15. If I had seen your message earlier, I wouldn’t have bothered posting on your talk. Next time, maybe apply a little common sense before bringing this tone here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:10, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Draftification

Hi there, I have Khondaker Abdullah Al Mamun on my watchlist so I saw you draftify it. Just a flag that I already did previously; it was moved back to mainspace: . I think it needs to be AfD'd but I haven't gotten around to it yet. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Ack, never mind, I just saw that you were reverting a sockpuppet. Ignore my comment and thanks for doing the cleanup! Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

It's all good, no worries Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Help

Could you please find the problem in archive settings in my talk page. I can't find any mistakes. Still not working. 🤔 United Blasters (talk) 12:01, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

I manually archive my threads, so I have no idea what the settings for auto archiving are. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Oh I see, thanks for the reply. Good day 🙏 United Blasters (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Antonio Amaya

Hi. Per: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Boxing

You need to bring Antonio Amaya back to main space. He qualifies for main space by a mile. Only boxers among the top ten may fight for a world title in the WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO. He fought for world titles three times and Boxing notability establishes that any boxer ranked in the top ten meets notability. Thank you. Jeanette La Campeona Martin (Aqui) 17:30, 9 February, 2025 (UTC)

User:JeanetteMartin, you have synthesized the whole article from the boxing match outcomes, which is clearly not suitable for mainspace. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

That's how it usually is done on most boxing articles. Besides, the style has no bearing as far as his notability which is widely established. he passes boxing notability by a mile. And, Boxrec is our go to for boxing articles. Jeanette de Caguas Martin 18:48, 9 February, 2025 (UTC) Antonio Martin (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

• Amaya had better luck in his next fight
• This was one of only ten knockout wins that Amaya amassed in 77 professional fights.
• to stop his nine-fight winning streak in the main event of a program
• All five of those wins were on points over ten rounds, with two coming in Mexico, two in Caracas, Venezuela and the Barrientos one in Panama.
• Amaya kept busy with matches against important rivals after the Kobayashi defeats. Right after the Kobayashi rematch, Amaya met Nigerian contender Ray Adigun on 18 October, 1970 at the Gimnasio Nuevo Panama (now known as "Roberto Duran Arena", named after legendary boxer Roberto Duran). The Adigun fight was a rarity in Amaya's career, as the two contenders boxed until the sixth-round, with Amaya deemed a winner by technical knockout. This was the main event of a show in which Duran himself participated, with Duran knocking out Ignacio Castaneda in the third round.

This is not how we write BLP articles on Wikipedia and as an experienced editor, you should already know this. Per WP:BLPSOURCES, the inline citations you provided do not verify any of the randomly selected statements above. A thorough review would likely strip the article down from B class to a stub.

You can use BoxRec to support a table of Amaya’s matches, similar to Zelfa Barrett. But adding WP:OR with phrases like "Amaya had better luck" or "Amaya kept busy with matches against important rivals" is unacceptable. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Oh, so because of my style of writing, his article deserves to be deleted? Ive been writing that way for 20 years and never had a problem until today. Besides, there is nothing in policy that says you can delete an article of a clearly notable person only because you don't like the style it is written like. Jeanette The Wild Snake Martin 20:04, 9 February, 2025 (UTC) Antonio Martin (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

It's not about the style of your writing but rather the amount of original research you are adding to an article. After reading what you wrote, if the readers think that the boxer won because he had 'better luck' than his competition in one of his fights, then it is very misleading and unfair to the subject itself. You are violating WP:V and WP:BLPSOURCES, to be precise.

I see that you have submitted the draft for review, so you will probably receive feedback from another editor. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Instead of putting a speedy deletion tag or drafting it, you could have simply edited out the parts you point at? I usually don't get into edit wars over that. ANd, as i said, the subject easily passes the boxing notability guideline. (which is weak in my own opinion but even if we strengthened it to people who fouhght in world title matches and up, he'd still pass) Jeanette Madonna Ringwald Martin (Aqui) 06:51,10 February, 2025 (UTC)

I would have simply removed the WP:OR if it were just a few lines, but the whole article is synthesized, which is why I sent it to draft. No comments regarding his notability. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

I see...so you ask for speedy deletion simply because there are a few lines on the article you think should be removed and notwithstanding the subject passing the boxing notability bar? You are not dealing with policy there. Jeanette Lover Queen Martin (Aqui) 11:54,10 February, 2025 (UTC)

It's tiring for me to explain the same thing to you again and again. The article contains 80-90% WP:OR, not just a few lines as you claim. The onus is on you to fix the problems in the article, not on the reviewers. Also, you shouldn’t be worrying this much if you believe the article is suitable for the mainspace as is. Any reviewer who comes across the draft will accept it if they think the same. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Its tiring also to explain to you that you can just click on edit and edit it before nominating it for speedy delete.To me, that tells me you just wanted it deleted, and maybe that you are a deletionist? And its tiring to deal with your attitude too. As far as the article, I've no doubt it will be reinstated because the subject passes notability by a mile. As far as my style of writing, no one's complained in 21 years, until you came along. So.....it seems people here do not mind, except you. Jeanette La Nena Martin (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

No, editors assume that someone with 50,000 edits and 20+ years of experience would probably know how to create articles, follow core policies and ultimately do the right thing. But it seems that you have greatly misused that trust until now.

Take this issue to any WP:BLPN/WP:ANI noticeboard and you will see yourself hit with a WP:BOOMERANG. Stop writing articles as if they are fictional short stories and please learn WP:V, one of Wikipedia’s core policies. Wikipedia content is determined by previously published information rather than editors' beliefs, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information. Doing something wrong for 20 years doesn’t make it right. Your writing style is completely unsuitable for wikipedia because people come here for reliable information, not unverifiable content added just because you feel wikipedia articles lack depth or style and choose to insert your own. Finally, don’t ask other editors to clean up your mess. It’s not their job, especially when you do it intentionally. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

You have an attitude problem and need to address that. As far as my writing, only you have ever had any problems. In fact, my writing has indirectly led me to meeting one President of the United States and several government officials. You need to learn Wikipedia policy. Writing style is not among the policies to put an article on "speedy delete". In fact, it says so here: "WP:G1:Further information: Wikipedia:Patent nonsense

This applies to pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. It does not cover poor writing". Also this: "Notability. Articles that seem to have obviously non-notable subjects are eligible for speedy deletion only if the article does not give a credible indication of why the subject might be important or significant." the latter is clearly achieved in the article. Im not going to keep answering because you seem to just want to keep the article out no matter what. But it will be back up soon anyways. Have a good rest of your life.Jeanette Porn model Martin (Aqui) 15:11,10 February, 2025 (UTC)

The only problem we need to address here is how we are going to remove the amount of WP:OR/WP:SYNTH you have added to articles so far. Either way, I think we'll probably meet once again in ANI if you continue with the same writing style. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

You will meet a lot of people at ANI if you keep your attitude. And you are not changing my writing style. No one has ever complained but you so. Dont talk to me anymore. Goodbye. Jeanette Crazy chick Martin (Aqui) 16:52, 9 February, 2025 (UTC)

Harsha Chemudu

Removing half of his filmography is uncalled for, where should we look for sources since they will be in Telugu language? DareshMohan (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

You are well aware of WP:ONUS and please don't restore the content I removed with the edit summary "ce", it makes no sense. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:29, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok thanks, I should be aware of all policies, I added some sources. DareshMohan (talk) 07:26, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Are you planning to add more sources to the article? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:45, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Ponnar Shankar

Its about the Ponnar Shankar article which I have requested for page protection, but it was rejected and later you have made some edits on the article and reverted the best version of the article, but it seems the unsourced content have been added again without proper source and mixing up two articles (Ponnar Shankar (film)) which is clearly different from this article, so i request you to kindly look up the article and the user who keep adding the information on it. Mr.fakepolicy (talk) 09:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

List of Vellalars

Moved to Talk:List of Vellalars § List of Vellalars

 – Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Leena Nair Edits

Hello @Jeraxmoira

Thank you for your recent work on the Leena Nair article, in reverting unsubstantiated edits. I’m reaching out because I have a conflict of interest regarding this page and would appreciate your independent review.

I’ve submitted a detailed edit request on the article’s Talk page to improve its neutrality, as it has carried a neutrality violation tag for over a year. My request proposes specific changes, all backed by reliable sources, to ensure the article aligns with Wikipedia’s standards.

You can find my request here: Talk:Leena Nair. I’d be grateful if you could review it when convenient. If you have any feedback, I’m happy to collaborate further. Thanks for your time. Best, Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Make separate edit requests for each statement you are trying to add or change. From a glance, your first proposed change "During her tenure, Unilever was recognised as a top FMCG graduate employer in multiple countries." does not have a supporting source and the existing source in the article does not mention this either. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I will create separate edit request for all statements, and revert on the first proposed change to ensure this is fully substantiated. I appreciate your input. Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 16:39, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Occasionalpedestrian, don't bother new/student editors with your COI request, as they may not be familiar with the policies. Please revert the message you left on User:Peoniesandtulips's talk page. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your direction, and yes I have reverted this message. Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 16:50, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Jeraxmoira, thank you for all your recent help and guidance on the Leena Nair article. Now the article has been revised to remove promotional content and improve neutrality, would it now be appropriate to remove the neutrality violation banner? Any further advice and guidance on this matter would be greatly appreciated Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Jeraxmoira

Thank you for all your recent help and guidance on the Leena Nair article. Since we last spoke this article has been further revised to remove promotional content and improve neutrality. The student editor has also made further changes to address neutrality concerns and improve accuracy.

I’d like to gather consensus on whether it’s now appropriate to remove the neutrality violation banner and find a way to move this forwards. Would you mind if I tagged you on the Talk page as a recent editor to help gather consensus on this matter?

Any further advice and guidance would be greatly appreciated. Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 15:10, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Category:Editor filmographies has been nominated for deletion

Category:Editor filmographies has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 4meter4 (talk) 05:35, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Merger discussion for K. P. Yohannan

An article that you have been involved in editing—K. P. Yohannan—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 08:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Sigh, I was going to BLAR it. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Attention to Dheeran Chinnamalai Page

Dear @Jeraxmoira

I noticed you had removed some misinformation on the Dheeran Chinnamalai page. I request you to revert the page back to it's original state from before the edits of the following user

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/223.178.82.35

The user has been involved in Vandalism of another page as well targetting members of the Kongu Vellalar community.

The actions of the user include converting a real life Indian freedom fighter belonging to a particular community to a character in a fiction story which has been deeply hurting to the sentiments of the community.

Since the page was protected subsequently, I have been unable to make further edits.

Thank you Lokesheswaran (talk) 09:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable source confirming that Dheeran Chinnamalai was a real person? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

who are you?

Who are you to decide what is apt for main space? The producer S. Naga Vamsi is national award winning notable producer, also stop your tactics, you remove all the extensive details i provide in my article, u spoil the article and manipulate it with half edits to make it look like non-notable, and take credit for my edits? i created the article, not you. i know what is notable and what is not. stop your tactics or i will report you to administrator and arbitration committe. in the name of notability you take credit for my work? for my work you take undue credit? for my work? if you have issue with notability discuss in talk page and will add references. stop moving it to draft space without consensus. i am experienced editor, stop ur tactis on me. most importantly stop your non sense and stop wasting my time. i dont know from where editors like you pop up to waste time and energy. stop interfering on this article. stop stop stop. are you threatening me? like you did in the above case. this is serious matter.I know habitual draft space movers such as you who want to take undue credit for others work. Non sense. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 06:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

FYI. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Help

Hello, @Jeraxmoira Can you help me for get back the Category:Tamil-language web series, i don't know why only Tamil language Category was delete. Category:Indian web series by language. மகிழ்கலைஞன் (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Feel free to recreate it and start populating it with the relevant web series. It looks like it was deleted for a different reason. Just don’t add articles about TV series to it. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

• Thanks @Jeraxmoira

Stop doing disruptive edits on multiple pages and accept facts from reliable sources: unnecessary talk

This is your Final warning.

If you keep on doing disruptive editing as you have done in Lingaa, Annathe, and List of highest-grossing Tamil films or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tags: Twinkle, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing

Also, check the articles and read before putting unnecessary talk. There is a proper source for my details and it does not have anything to do with biographies of living persons or defamatory content as you have suggested. It is just talking about a movie collection. How is that defamatory? Prove that my facts are unsourced or poorly sourced.

The citation is from a site that is repeatedly used in many references for movie collections: NDTV. You are being a Highly Sensitive Person to simple facts.

Snap out of your fan mindset and accept criticism from reliable sources!!!.

It can not be stopped.

In addition, stop putting unnecessary talk in my page. Don't you have anything productive to do? Tamilcontent1 (talk)

Cheers!

Would appreciate your help with Baring Ventures

Hi there, I saw your message on the article I requested (Baring Ventures). I don't mind this article being a stub, but I would appreciate your help here. If you check out Michael Calvey you will notice that the company he founded after exiting Russia does not have its own entry, and it should. The company's website () details a lot of the information that is mentioned in my attempt at an article, and corroborated in the links I provided. The company is part of Michael Calvey's story, and the absence of information on it here on Wikipedia leaves users with an incomplete story. If you or any other editors could please help with the creation of this article, I would be most thankful. NoraBV1986 (talk) 10:05, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Please read WP:NCORP and WP:SIRS. The current sources in the draft do not help in establishing the notability of Baring Ventures. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:53, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I have now submitted a request via the "Request Page" process, with the full explanation of Baring Ventures' notability. I appreciate your help on this! NoraBV1986 (talk) 07:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Vijay Velukutty

Any sources like Vikatan interview with him? DareshMohan (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

I am not able to find anything. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Deleted articles

Was thinking about creating drafts for the following deleted articles in neutral tone, but I wanted to ask you if they were deleted on notability concerns. Pretty sure they were deleted due to COI.

1. Draft:Harshavardhan Rameshwar (Oottakomban) (Producer and ad lib vocals for "Ghamand Kar" from Tanhaji ) . Claim to fame: Arjun Reddy, Animal and Spirit.
2. Draft:Rohit-Sasi
3. Draft:Ritesh Rana

Ritesh Rana and Harshavardhan Rameshwar will without a doubt be more relevant in the future once more of their work releases (Spirit, Mathu Vadalara 3). Sad to see Rohit-Sasi not have an article since they were unique in the indie space. DareshMohan (talk) 02:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

If I were you, I wouldn’t bother recreating it. You’d essentially be helping the editor who was paid to create these articles and indirectly help him in escaping the mess he has created. If I remember correctly, you had a bit of interaction with the author of these articles and by recreating them back, it could raise suspicions that you’re also involved. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I agree with you. Also forgot to mention one. Katha Venuka Katha . @Jayanthkumar123: Film articles are better than biographical articles imo since they are not specifically attached to one person. DareshMohan (talk) 23:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Regarding Removal of Iftar Event Controversy Content

Hello @Jeraxmoira, I noticed that you reverted my edit (Revision 1285727603) on the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam article with the comment "Routine news." However, the information I added is based on a reliable news source (News18, dated 11 March 2025), which reports that a police complaint was filed against Vijay by the Tamil Nadu Sunnat Jamath, alleging that Muslims were insulted during an Iftar event he organized. The event generated media coverage and public discussion. As per Wikipedia's content guidelines for notable controversies and WP:RS (reliable sources), I believe this warrants brief inclusion in the "Controversies" section of the article. If the concern is about neutrality, I’m open to modifying the language to meet Wikipedia's standards. Kindly clarify why it was removed despite being sourced and relevant. Looking forward to your thoughts. Mushabikhan (talk) 06:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Tamilaga_Vettri_Kazhagam#Discussion_on_Inclusion_of_Recent_Iftar_Event_Controversy. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Multiple reverts for no reason at page Annaathe

When there are multiple sources, all reliable sources were mentioned in my edit. Those were reverted by user Jeraxmoira.

If you keep on adding disruptive edits as you have done in Lingaa, Annathe, and List of highest-grossing Tamil films or any other Wikipedia page, your account would be blocked. Last warning. Tags: Wikipedia:Vandalism - by user Jeraxmoira, Twinkle, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing Mentioned multiple times, Still keeps on doing edit warring.

Again you failed to prove that my source is unreliable. I have clear proof that my source is creditable and the documentation is here: Wikipedia:ICTFFAQ.

Avoid doing disruptive edits as you have keep on doing on the page Annaatthe. Tags: Continuous disruptive editing (Wikipedia:Vandalism) by user Jeraxmoira. Tags: Twinkle, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing

Give proper explanation before reverting. You are just saying a collection figure and related facts are incorrect from an article from a reputed site. What research did you do to come to this conclusion?

Ponni Nadhi

You recently created this redirect. I see "Ponni" in the article, but where is "Nadhi" coming from? Rusalkii (talk) 22:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

I am not able to find it right now, but I read somewhere that it is the Tamil translation of the "Kaveri River". There is also a book about it. If the redirected article needs to be explicitly mentioned in the redirect target, then it can be redirected to Ponniyin Selvan: I (soundtrack)#Track listing instead. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Meera Mahadhi

Hello, Jeraxmoira. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Meera Mahadhi".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Article for Draft Submission - Ft, Shiva Shambho

Hi @Jeraxmoira I've added more sources about the film and also removed the copied content from BookMyShow about the Plot, kindly have a look and please let me know what else is required

Draft:Shiva Shambho (2025 film) Thesazh (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

You should move it back to mainspace after adding two bylined, full-length reviews from reliable sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles June 2025 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | June 2025 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #JUN25, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Raghu Samarth

Hello, Jeraxmoira. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Raghu Samarth".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:29, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Uppu Kappurambu

@Jeraxmoira, article moved back to mainspace having non-reliable sources. 49.205.252.89 (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Jeraxmoira, thanks for adding the saishna96 case. It will be more useful and helpful for the check users if you can add more report. 49.205.252.89 (talk) 11:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

"Ponni Nadhi" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ponni Nadhi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 6 § Ponni Nadhi until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 19:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Reply

Hello I’ve seen ur deletion request to the Marlon hunt page I created, may u please reconsider and view the reply I sent to ur deletion request? Kompatsports (talk) 14:06, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello

I have tagged an article for deletion in the AFD nomination at Dream Knight Stories Private Limited. But you nominated it speedy deletion after me. Is it okay to have two nominations at the same time? ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 14:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

AfD isn't needed when the article can be G11'ed. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:50, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

But is it okay that I supported Wikipedia? ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 14:51, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

LKBT/Rrgilko

Good catch, Jeraxmoira! A couple drawers full of socks with those. The socking and UPE at AfD is out of hand. S0091 (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! And yeah, multiple AfDs were gamed all this while and sadly there wasn’t much we could do about it. I still have four more to add to the SPI, just need to find the time. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Chidananda S Naik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chidananda S Naik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chidananda S Naik (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 13:54, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Rafaelthegreat/poutine ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 21:19, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

No, Jeraxmoira.

No I did not. On BioSpring, I added "The company develops nucleic acid and oligonucleotides." Two paragraphs about what they develop is enough! I also removed the useless stuff. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 15:04, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

Clarification on removal of gallery-hosted official profile link

@Jeraxmoira Thanks for your edit. I noticed you removed the First Floor Gallery Harare link from the infobox of this article Amanda Shingirai Mushate with summary edit said “official website only” and “no Ecomm.” I believe this may be a misunderstanding. The linked page is the artist’s official biography/profile hosted on the representing gallery’s site not an e-commerce page. It contains career information, exhibitions and background and does not primarily function to sell works. Per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, it’s acceptable to use the official profile of the subject even if it’s hosted on a commercial domain, as long as it’s the authoritative page for that person and not mainly for sales.

If you still have concerns, we could open a brief discussion at the article’s talk page or the WP:ELN for consensus. 🐍 Thilio🤖 🐍 Thilio🤖 09:56, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

An artist’s official biography is not the same as their official website, so it cannot be placed in the infobox. Here is an example of a subject and their official website.

The other links you added in the External links section were already cited in the article, which makes them redundant. I removed the First Floor Gallery Harare link from the External links section because it is a user-submitted CV, but feel free to add it back, just not in the infobox. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:40, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

"The other links you added in the External links section were already cited in the article, which makes them redundant" I noticed that, You did right thing... Thanks for the clarifications, Appreciated. 🐍 Thilio🤖 🐍 Thilio🤖 10:49, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Request

Can you expand Madonne Ashwin in neutral tone? DareshMohan (talk) DareshMohan (talk) 20:40, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

I can look into it, but it may take longer since I have a draft pending for a while. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:21, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Vikram University Revision

Moved to Talk:Vikram University § Vikram University Revision

 – Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of my User page

You have put my user page for speedy delete, one thing I would like to clarify here is that the information listed on my page wasn't about me, I was tryin to save a source edit I had made earlier, and I do not have the intention to portray myself as someone else here. It was a mistake I made! Visruthpv (talk) 10:36, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tanveer Mir

Hello, Jeraxmoira. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tanveer Mir".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Chidananda S Naik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chidananda S Naik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chidananda S Naik (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KnightMight (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Clarification on Sources and Request for Guidance

Hello @Jeraxmoira,

Thank you for your feedback on the article (Kannada News Today). I would like to clarify a few points regarding the sources and references: for your Source assessment table

1). The TV3 Kannada article covers Kannada News Today and its founder. Although it is a regional Kannada news site, it directly relates to the subject and provides independent coverage.

2). I noticed that on the Chidananda S Naik page, which you created, Times of India is used as a reference even though it has no byline.

3). Similarly, The Hindu Post coverage on that page Chidananda S Naik also has no byline, sometimes only mentioning “The Hindu Bureau,” yet it is accepted as a source.

We mention this respectfully to better understand Wikipedia’s guidelines and to improve our contributions. Your valuable suggestions will help us ensure the article meets Wikipedia standards and contributes reliably to the platform.

Thank you for your guidance. Moulyags (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Who is “we” in We mention this respectfully?

Chidananda S. Naik is not being evaluated for WP:GNG and the sources used to establish notability are different from those cited to support statements in the article. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: National Cardiac Center

Hi there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I wanted to let you know that I've declined your G4 speedy deletion nomination of National Cardiac Center because the new article is significantly different from the one deleted via discussion, including new sources. If you think the subject still fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, feel free to nominate for deletion via AfD. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Noted! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:24, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Evelin van Rei for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evelin van Rei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelin van Rei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nat Gertler (talk) 19:07, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your recent work digging into unreliable sources at AfD. I really appreciate it. Your work uncovered some flagrant issues. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 16:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Question regarding your recent AfD comments

Hi Jeraxmoira, thanks again for your recent work. I couldn't help but notice that you didn't end up voting either way. I hope you consider it. It would be helpful. Take care, m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 16:22, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Request to Review

Hello @User:Jeraxmoira, I've edited Mini Shaji Thomas for neutral tone and added citations through web searches. Could you review and let me know if I'm on the right track and if the needs citations and subjective tags on the page can now be removed.ThamizhThai (talk) 08:53, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Creation request of Janani Ashok Kumar

Hello @User:Jeraxmoira, is it possible to create the article Janani Ashok Kumar which have been previously deleted due to other factors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aishwaryaa1511 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

You seem to have became familiar with adding images to articles, socking and other WP:MOS guidelines very quickly for someone with only two months of activity and about 200 edits. Please disclose any previous accounts you may have used. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:13, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tushar Rao Gedela

Hello, Jeraxmoira. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tushar Rao Gedela".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:28, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Request

Can you expand Neelan K. Sekar in neutral tone? DareshMohan (talk) 20:12, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, but these topics do not interest me. Please share if they are a cinematographer, then I might be able to look into it. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Leena Nair edits

Hello @Jeraxmoira

Thank you very much for your recent work on the Leena Nair article and for helping to maintain its accuracy and neutrality as I myself have a COI to the page. Your input and oversight have been really appreciated.

There have been a few further updates needed, and I have added a new post to the Talk page. For example Ms Nair has since left some of the positions currently listed. I have reliable sources available to support these changes.

I also noticed that the neutrality violation banner has been re-added to the article. Given the recent revisions made to improve tone and sourcing, I wanted to understand what steps might be taken to review this and potentially remove the banner if appropriate.

Would you mind if I tagged you on the Talk page again for your independent view and guidance? Your advice has been very helpful throughout this process.

Thank you again for your time and continued support.

Best regards, Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 15:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Viral TV

Hi Jera, been a while. At Special:History/Viral TV, I see your BLARed to Delta State University, but apart from the fact that the redirect target is incorrect (I can see why you chose that target, especially as the author of the article also used that target when they were referring to Delta State University, Abraka), the target, either ways, still does not work as the subject in question is not mentioned at all in any of them. I wanted to AfD it but decided to ask you first if you want to revert your BLARing and do the AFDing, or let me do it? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

I do not have the time to look into this right now, so feel free to AfD it. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Request

I added 2 English language sources to Maria (2025 film). English sources are preferred over non English sources but moving film articles to drafts has no basis when the article already has 2 reliable reviews. I did a basic Google search you could have done a WP: BEFORE. Then if no sources show up, you could nominate it for deletion instead. DareshMohan (talk) 18:49, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Film articles need to meet either GNG or NLFILM, but this one didn’t. NLFILM requires two bylined reviews from reliable sources, but one of the reviews wasn’t bylined, so the article was moved to draft. The onus is on the editor who creates the article to demonstrate notability, not on the new page patroller. Likewise WP:BEFORE isn’t required for moving articles to draft space. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Cinematographers

I found two cinematographers without much coverage on the internet: Lance Kalpan and Steve Rice (unreliable). The film Butterflies of Bill Baker received some sources: . Not enough information on Steve Rice for an article. DareshMohan (talk) 02:54, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

I believe neither of them have enough wikilinked credits, so it might be difficult to create standalone articles for them. William David is also credited for Rangitaranga. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Request

Hello, I added more than eight English language sources to Annamalai Kudumbam and Dhoolpet Police Station. English sources are preferred over non-English sources. What kind of resources do you need? Can you Please explain? மகிழ்கலைஞன் (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

The sources you’ve added are all routine coverage from marketing events intended to generate press. Examples include Annamalai Kudumbam’s 230-foot saree event, trailer/teaser launches and OTT release announcements. Almost all the sources you added for Annamalai Kudumbam simply repeat what V. S. Raghavan said at the event. You’ll need either two reviews of those TV shows or independent, non-promotional sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:19, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Annamalai Kudumbam : , Here are some other sources. What about Dhoolpet Police Station, I added strong sources.--மகிழ்கலைஞன் (talk) 19:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

You need three reliable sources for GNG and the only one you have is from The Hindu. The rest are generated from the promotional event they conducted. As for Dhoolpet Police Station, there are no reliable sources on the draft. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Zuck28 SPI

Just a note, I have deleted Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zuck28 without prejudice for another proper SPI to be created. Your report fell well below the standard that is required for SPIs. An 11k edit account just editing an obscure topic alongside a new account is an inappropriate use of an SPI. If you wish to refile this report, please gather the proper evidence required for SPI. -- Amanda (she/her) 17:02, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jeraxmoira!

Happy New Year!

Jeraxmoira,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 02:29, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 02:29, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Nigel Bluck

On 14 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nigel Bluck, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nigel Bluck's cinematography has been compared to the work of painter Edward Hopper? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nigel Bluck. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nigel Bluck), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:03, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Sikkalana Kudumbathin Uruppinarhal

Notable? DareshMohan (talk) 02:59, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't think there's enough coverage and merely getting selected won’t cut it. As far as I can see, the only solid source is THR. Probably WP:TOOSOON? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:47, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

There is a review here . DareshMohan (talk) 23:06, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Swathi Konde

Are you gatekeeping the article due to possible COI, she passes WP:NACTOR, not sure if sources are sufficient. But wonder who put her name in lead in Pavi Caretaker. P.S. You should improve M. S. Prabhu, N. K. Ekambaram, etc's articles. DareshMohan (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

It was part of a cleanup. My next will probably be Draft:Ed Moore (cinematographer) when I get the time. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Is Sri Gouri Priya notable? I noticed that it was moved to draft by you due to COI. See . She only has 2nd/3rd billing in Tamil credits of 2 films and 1 web series. DareshMohan (talk) 21:58, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

Hello Jeraxmoira,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Some person added caste name to Periyar please undo it.~2026-32381-44 (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Chaluve Gowda Notability

Hello, Chaluve Gowda should be afd, not a redirect. He is not notable and it can be clarified through afd. ~2026-34254-39 (talk) 08:56, 10 June 2026 (UTC)