Jauhsekali

Jauhsekali, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jauhsekali! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North American Rockwell OV-10 Bronco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jombang. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Please read WP:SHIPS

Please read WP:SHIPS on how ship classes are hyphenated. Llammakey (talk) 12:00, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Type 97 Te-Ke tankette article

You recent edits have been reverted given they are not WP:RS cited and your "guess" or what you think the machine gun may be is irrelevant; please read WP:OR. We must go by the RS cited sources, our opinions do not matter. The cited sources, which I double checked yesterday, state the Type 97 heavy tank machine gun was the one used. If you have a RS source that states the 7.7 mm aircraft machine gun was used on this occasion for this IJA tankette, then you must provide it for consideration. Otherwise, you are edit-warring if you revert again. For any further discussion one is to go to the talk page for an article; see WP:BRD. Kierzek (talk) 13:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

I saw your post on the talk page, I will comment by Monday evening. I’m out of town this weekend. Kierzek (talk) 23:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

I posted my thoughts on the article talk page. Kierzek (talk) 02:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Links in the infobox

Do not repeat links in the infobox; use them once only.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: KRI Tanjung Nusanive (973) has been accepted

KRI Tanjung Nusanive (973), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AntanO 05:16, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Ship prefix

Can you be more specific with your ref? A quote and the page number would do it. - wolf 20:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

@Thewolfchild:, sorry to jump into disucssoin. The first usage of "RI" prefix can be seen in page 31 (quote: "Mula2 diserahkan Kapal2 Perang ringan terdiri dari Kapal2 Patroli, kemudian menjusul empat Korvet dan beberapa Kapal' Pendarat LeI dan achirnja sebuah Kapal Pemburu Torpedo, jang selandjutnja kita berikan nama Rl GADJAH MADA dan beberapa lama merupakan Kapal Pemimpin Angkatan Laut kita"). It was also seen in page 32, 34-37, 43, 47, 53-56, 59, 63, 181. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Moroccan frigate Allal Ben Abdellah. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for creating the article! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome! Jauhsekali (talk) 00:13, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Moroccan frigate Sultan Moulay Ismail. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:54, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Russian frigate Dzerzhinskiy. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:12, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Algerian frigate El Moudamir. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Much thanks too! Jauhsekali (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on French frigate Amiral Ronarc'h. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on ENS Al-Qahhar. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged and hope that you will write more articles! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Algerian frigate Mourad Rais. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! I appreciate it. Jauhsekali (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Kota Padang railway station. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Kedungjati railway station. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Bondowoso Rail and Train Museum. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on Prabumulih Baru X5 railway station. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

"Type 1 machine gun" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Type 1 machine gun has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § Type 1 machine gun until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 19:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on List of 7.62×54mmR firearms. Another editor, Lightburst, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the list article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 17:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Jauhsekali

File:Official_seal_of_the_Province_of_Bali.png Ini adalah lambang resmi Provinsi Bali didapatkan langsung dari website resmi provinsi, bukan ini File:Coat of arms of Bali.svg ini lambang yang dibuat ulang dari lambung yang asli diatas oleh pengguna di Wikipedia, bukan soal kualitas bang tapi lambang nya asli atau palsu. Wikipedia itu harus asli semua bang. Wong cilik iso gemuyu (talk) 00:36, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, but the quality of the image is poor, pixelated and has lower resolution, unless you could found a better resolution of the logo (or make it yourself), it's better to use the latter file. Also, even the provincial government itself does not have a standard on specific color used on the logo, see the logo on JDIH Prov Bali and Bappeda Prov Bali, are those "fake" logo too? even BKPSDM Bali also used your so called "fake" logo. Jauhsekali (talk) 02:01, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Kereta Api Indonesia rolling stock classes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Esslingen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of List of battlecruisers of World War I for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of battlecruisers of World War I is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of battlecruisers of World War I until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GGOTCC (talk) 20:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Emblem Bali

Mari kita gunakan yang asli dari website nya terlebih dahulu sambil menunggu pembaruan lambang tidak resmi jika tidak diperbarui itu harus dituntut untuk dihapus karena melanggar undang-undang tentang membagikan logo/gambar yang tidak resmi ke situs situs seperti Wikipedia termasuk Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, serta Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) mengenai pembagian logo (termasuk lambang) palsu. Indonesianinfo2 (talk) 11:23, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Article on kf 21- potential operators

india has denied any interest in the kf 21 aircraft,requesting not to spread any misinformation on the potential operators nor any conflict. 117.230.151.139 (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

You might want to ask the question to User:Terrylee814 (talk), as they're the one that added it. I too oppose such needless inclusion as it ruined the layout. Jauhsekali (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Kaan

Look these pages they not have that Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon also i think it is unnecessary as they will not operate. If it enters service we can add them on operational section with their names mentioned. Shadow4dark (talk) 01:45, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Yes that's my point, those articles also DOES NOT show the flags of the POTENTIAL operators, so why you added it back? what is your point? what are you trying to say? also you might want to properly cite your source, don't just add bare links. Jauhsekali (talk) 01:51, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Bare links are fixed, sometimes the bot is not working. You can delete these flags but you made worser to adding unnecessary sections for irrelevant countries. Shadow4dark (talk) 02:01, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

How are those irrelevant? if those countries are irrelevant, why don't you delete it in your edits? you only reinstating the flags without deleting your so called "irrelevant countries". Jauhsekali (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Or, just change the name of section from "Exports" to "Potential bids", it would cover any country that are only interested to those that has signed contract, and Potential bids is also used on many other combat aircraft article. Jauhsekali (talk) 02:12, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jauhsekali. Thank you for your work on KRI Belati. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article, your work is greatly appreciated! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 11:09, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello, I'm Swatjester. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chengdu J-10 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove reliably sourced content, particularly with inaccurate edit summaries such as "rumor milling"; that is not an appropriate way to describe the content in question, which was reliably sourced to three subject matter experts in a major regional media outlet. It appears you did not actually check the URL (which was incorrect, I fixed it to the correct link) or confirm the reliability of the underlying claim: see e.g. the AP confirming the same announcement, for instance. Please take more care in the future when reverting content. Thanks. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 02:48, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I have explained the issue with 42 units of J-10 before at Talk:Chengdu J-10#Indonesian J-10, my problem is there's no definitive source of where the number 42 comes from, as even the Indonesian government officials is yet to reveal the actual number of J-10s. Yes, many reputable media has reported the number 42, but they did not reveal where do they got the numbers from. I say this is a woozle effect, just because they're cited from reputable media doesn't mean they're true. Jauhsekali (talk) 03:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

My conclusion is, unless there are source that explicitly mention that the involved stakeholders (government officials, the military, and/or the manufacturer) has stated that Indonesia would acquire 42 J-10s, then it's just a mere unfounded rumors, which does not belongs to Wikipedia, and if so, has to be stated as rumors and not actual decision taken by the Indonesian government. Jauhsekali (talk) 03:21, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm genuinely surprised that with over 8,000 edits on this project, that you seem to completely misunderstand the core premises of our verifiability and reliable source policies. We are not responsible for hunting down the original source of the 42 aircraft claim. It is sufficient that multiple reliable sources, including the per-consensus perennially reliable AP News, say that it is correct. Wikipedia runs on verifiability; not truth; the claim of 42 aircraft being acquired is quite easily verifiable to the given sources. That's all that is required. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 03:23, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Then would it be okay to list them as mere "claim", since there no official statements yet? Jauhsekali (talk) 03:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

There is an official statement, as the AP directly states that there is: Indonesia’s top defense official said Wednesday that Jakarta will acquire at least 42 Chinese-made Chengdu J-10C fighter jets, marking the country’s first non-Western aircraft purchase deal. The AP is expressly stating that this statement was made to reporters. Their article does not need to quote him word for word; we are quite capable of accepting their paraphrasing of his statement. In fact, it would be less ideal to use the official statement instead, as that would be a WP:PRIMARY source, whereas the AP is a fact-checked WP:SECONDARY source. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 03:29, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

You see, previously I have written the published timeline of Indonesian interest on J-10, which includes points that I personally did not agree at here, but then it got simplified by other editor. So I think okay then, maybe we should stick to official stuff. And so, could we get back to this version please? Jauhsekali (talk) 03:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Why would we remove reliably sourced content based on your personal preference? There is no policy-based reason to remove the claim. No, that's absolutely not OK. The edit you're referring to cut out a large amount of unnecessary detail that was not particularly helpful to the reader's understanding of the article, and summarized it at a higher level; none of that is particularly relevant to removing the number of aircraft being purchased, which very much *is* relevant to the reader's understanding and does not require a summarization for brevity. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 03:34, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Including the Bloomberg article where it directly contradicts the "established" 42 number? Jauhsekali (talk) 03:44, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Where does it "directly contradict" the number? There are only two Bloomberg links in the article at this time. Both were written 5 months prior to the announcement, so clearly you can't mean those. If you meant the one you posted on the talk page, that doesn't contradict the claim -- it says that Bloomberg did not get an answer when they asked how many. Bloomberg not receiving an answer does not contradict the AP's explicit statement as to the number. But again, that Bloomberg piece is not actually present in the article. What would be a direct contradiction would be if Bloomberg said "No, there are 17 being purchased." Bloomberg saying "Our outlet does not know exactly how many are being purchased" does not contradict the AP News statement as to what *they* were told was the range being purchased. But if you want, we could attribute the AP's claim with "According to the Associated Press", ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 03:51, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Very well, at the very least I could agree with the AP attribution. Jauhsekali (talk) 03:57, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Jauhsekali (talk) 03:58, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jauhsekali! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Article development
• Help desk

If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! User:Wikipedian12512 (talk) 02:58, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Very, very belated. Wikipedian12512 (talk) 02:47, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wahai Airport

The article Wahai Airport has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable airstrip stub. Only sources are dead URLs which seem to be primary.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 07:00, 25 May 2026 (UTC)