Welcome!

edit

Hi ILoveRuffRuffman2013! I noticed your contributions to Windows 98 and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ~Liancetalk 00:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I want to be great at doing changes! ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
Hi ILoveRuffRuffman2013! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:52, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Grammar changes

edit

Note that many of the grammar changes you are making to articles are incorrect, and I have reverted the changes. You may want to help in other areas that do not involved copy-editing for grammar.-- Ponyobons mots 21:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

OK. I guess. ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

This is not a sockpuppet. I'm sorry for my past actions.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

I did edit warning, copyright violations, and bad changes as an IP address. My account is not a sockpuppet. I learned how to be a better editor. The self reporting was actually correct. I know not to make bad edits. ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I don't find this convincing. Yamla (talk) 11:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #11111 was submitted on Apr 14, 2025 12:09:22. This review is now closed.


cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

Yamla, I think you are being a bit of a disappointment. You are one of those admins who decline unblock requests. Should I read Help:I have been blocked? ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (talk) 23:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. Further abuse of the request template will result in loss of access to this page. 331dot (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

Hello. I feel like the action of being blocked indefinitely is being a big impact on my life. I am explaining why I want to be unblocked: 1. I am not from Australia. I am from the US. 2. I will not make any sockpuppet accounts anymore. I am wishing to be an extended confirmed user, then an interface admin. 3. I was (Redacted) when I did edit warring. I have greatly improved since then. 4. I was blamed by a admin, claiming that content copied from another article is a sign of copyright violations. I no longer do that action. 5. I understand that I SHOULD not edit as an IP address while blocked. Plus, doing so is not a GOOD idea. 6. I was a person using an IP address for 5 YEARS! I am not doing that anymore. 7. I, in no way can be a sockmaster of JK. He is banned from editing, until further notice. 8. I have agreed to be unblocked to be free from any blocks. End of unblock request. Please accept this unblock request.

Decline reason:

Given your disruption while logged in and out, it would not be a good idea to unblock you. Also, given your further disruption on this talk page, I've removed your ability to edit it. When you're older, you can make an unblock request via UTRS, as below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • So you're not Jurrasic kid, but have engaged in sockpuppetry? With which accounts? PhilKnight (talk) 01:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • I did not do sockpuppety with any accounts, but I rather did sockpuppetry with 2 IP address which are 174.27.21.219, and 174.27.181.136. Also, I do NOT like my pages being deleted in

a false postive way. ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (talk) 23:30, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply