User talk:Hurricane Wind and Fire/Archive 2
Re: RAOK
editThanks Hurricane Wind and Fire! I try and be a helpful editor and be welcoming. That's mostly because I am sure I have annoyed many editors over the years, and I'm still trying to do better. I'm curious what aspect of storms you're most interested in. I've seen your name around here and there. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink I'm realizing that for tropical cyclones, I'm having a harder time expanding the met history and impact section because I am less knowledgeable in the subject. I think I'm getting more into updating lists for individual states, as I'm seeing some lists (namely List of Delaware hurricanes) that are no longer up to featured article status I want to work on. I'm still mainly focusing on updating and creating articles related to wildfires, and recently my two recent DYK-approved articles. Thanks for the message, Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 21:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- Just so you know, the impact section is much easier than the met history! The main thing you need to do is organize the information and cite it. And the citing part can be as easy as <ref>https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL012025_Andrea.pdf</ref>, if you just include the URL. The lists for individual states are on the easier side, since you can rely on existing articles to help flesh it out, but sometimes you need to do more research. For example, you mentioned the List of Delaware hurricanes - none of the storms since Jeanne in 2004 have any kind of damage totals. Also, the one storm-related death (Isaias) doesn't have what happened. But you might have to do some research. I'm curious, do you know where you can find information such as damage totals and storm fatalities? There are many such resources, but I wanted to see if you knew any of them first. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:58, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- For damage totals, I know AccuWeather is not a reliable source, but overall for fatalities and damage, I really only look for AP articles or news articles that cite AP. Otherwise, I normally look at the USA Today franchise articles (like this) until my free article limit runs out :/ 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 18:09, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- The AP is good, but they're not the only reliable source. I wanted to make sure you knew about the NCDC storm event database. You can look up by any state/date/weather event. Good reports are from the mid-1990s to the present, but sometimes they have older events going back to 1950. Here are the reports for Tropical Storm Isaias. However, this information is often replicated from other sources, such as the National Weather Service. Here is the NWS report, which has a ton of information, check out all of the tabs, like Environment, Warnings, PSH, Tropical Storm Reports, etc. Don't forget to check out the tropical cyclone reports on the NHC website, which go back to at least 1991 (with a ton of reports for older storms available elsewhere). I hope that helps, but isn't too overwhelming at the same time! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:22, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink, thank you for all the sources! I will work on improving List of Delaware hurricanes in the next couple days, but right now, I'm going in and out of an edit in my userspace draft to view the sources you've given me and I have something in real life I need to pay attention to. I will bookmark these websites and look at them. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 18:27, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- The AP is good, but they're not the only reliable source. I wanted to make sure you knew about the NCDC storm event database. You can look up by any state/date/weather event. Good reports are from the mid-1990s to the present, but sometimes they have older events going back to 1950. Here are the reports for Tropical Storm Isaias. However, this information is often replicated from other sources, such as the National Weather Service. Here is the NWS report, which has a ton of information, check out all of the tabs, like Environment, Warnings, PSH, Tropical Storm Reports, etc. Don't forget to check out the tropical cyclone reports on the NHC website, which go back to at least 1991 (with a ton of reports for older storms available elsewhere). I hope that helps, but isn't too overwhelming at the same time! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:22, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- For damage totals, I know AccuWeather is not a reliable source, but overall for fatalities and damage, I really only look for AP articles or news articles that cite AP. Otherwise, I normally look at the USA Today franchise articles (like this) until my free article limit runs out :/ 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 18:09, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- Just so you know, the impact section is much easier than the met history! The main thing you need to do is organize the information and cite it. And the citing part can be as easy as <ref>https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL012025_Andrea.pdf</ref>, if you just include the URL. The lists for individual states are on the easier side, since you can rely on existing articles to help flesh it out, but sometimes you need to do more research. For example, you mentioned the List of Delaware hurricanes - none of the storms since Jeanne in 2004 have any kind of damage totals. Also, the one storm-related death (Isaias) doesn't have what happened. But you might have to do some research. I'm curious, do you know where you can find information such as damage totals and storm fatalities? There are many such resources, but I wanted to see if you knew any of them first. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:58, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
I see you have a bunch of drafts for wildfire articles. I think you have the better idea of working on state wildfire lists by year, like the 2025 New Mexico wildfires. It would be nice to have "Wildfires in..." each state someday. Check out the template for US wildfires, which shows a bunch of redlinks, meaning a bunch of state articles don't exist yet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink I'm working on the lists for Nevada and Utah in my sandbox, but the problem is, there are a lot of states (especially along the East Coast) that do not have enough notable wildfires. And the ones notable enough for lists, such as Nevada, Utah, and Idaho, will take a very long time to complete because I have to find a lot of information. With 2020 Nevada wildfires being outdated, the only thing keeping me together in my sandbox right now is this source! While I tend to focus on writing about individual wildfires and updating season articles, I will pursue creating lists for the three states I mentioned. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 21:47, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure how widely available the info was, compared to hurricanes, which are very easy to get information for going back centuries. As for Nevada, you could base the yearly wildfire list off of California. There is already 2024 and 2025 Nevada wildfires, so you don't need to recreate that. Have you tried NCDC for previous years? Here is a list of Nevada events and Utah events going back to 1997. Hope that helps a bit! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm trying to go as far back as I can where season articles are no longer present, but 1980 may be the limit with the ARCGIS source. For recent years as far back as the 2010s or so, I will be using a lot of local news outlets (like KTVN or KUTV), but I very recently became an AfC reviewer on a probationary basis guess I know how to spend my free Saturday mornings now. These sources will really help. I should be good finishing the 2020s for Nevada and Utah, as I wrote the 2022 and 2025 season articles for NV and nearly finished 2021 before deleting it with the wrong keyboard shortcut, along 2023 and 2025 for UT and a complete 2020 article to guide me. Again, thanks for the help, even though you do not edit in this subject. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 01:46, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, 1980 isn't bad, that's a solid 40 some years of information! And it's not like wildfires have been named and documented consistently in that entire time. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm trying to go as far back as I can where season articles are no longer present, but 1980 may be the limit with the ARCGIS source. For recent years as far back as the 2010s or so, I will be using a lot of local news outlets (like KTVN or KUTV), but I very recently became an AfC reviewer on a probationary basis guess I know how to spend my free Saturday mornings now. These sources will really help. I should be good finishing the 2020s for Nevada and Utah, as I wrote the 2022 and 2025 season articles for NV and nearly finished 2021 before deleting it with the wrong keyboard shortcut, along 2023 and 2025 for UT and a complete 2020 article to guide me. Again, thanks for the help, even though you do not edit in this subject. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 01:46, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure how widely available the info was, compared to hurricanes, which are very easy to get information for going back centuries. As for Nevada, you could base the yearly wildfire list off of California. There is already 2024 and 2025 Nevada wildfires, so you don't need to recreate that. Have you tried NCDC for previous years? Here is a list of Nevada events and Utah events going back to 1997. Hope that helps a bit! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
My article
editHello, I have scoured the internet for reliable sources and put a huge amount of effort into this article, Battle of Ghindaoani I have backed up every paragraph and important statement with sources, the majority of which are online, reliable and available for translation easily. Please would you be so kind to review it again. SpandauSteaua (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, @SpandauSteaua. Theroadislong has recently reviewed your draft. I have to compliment you on the improvements you made in such little time. Congratulations! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 22:56, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I just saw, my first article has been published. Thanks for the speedy reply and compliment! SpandauSteaua (talk) 22:59, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 November 2025
edit- News and notes: Temporary accounts go live and WMF board member self-suspends
ArbCom elections draw close, and Wikimania '27 in Santiago.
- Community view: Six Wikipedians' thoughts on Grokipedia, and the humanity of it all
It ain't a five course meal, according to one of our interviewees.
- Wikicup report: BeanieFan11, WikiCup victor of 2025, covers the results
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
- In the media: Jimbo's book, an argument about genocide, and a train of shame
Wikipedia's new rival, political controversy in Italy and other Wiki-reports.
- Recent research: Taking stock of the 2024–2025 research grants
$400,000 USD in total funding: what did we get?
- Opinion: With Grokipedia, top-down control of knowledge is new again
Does it shed any light on particular topics that are better suited to LLM-generation than others?
- Obituary: Struway
Rest in peace.
- Traffic report: The documentaried, the disowned, the deceased, Diwali and the Dodgers
You know your man is working hard, he's worth a deuce.
- Comix: Head of steam
'Sblood!
I will do what's right and find more reliable sources. R2025kt (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
I need your help please. Can you look over the updated draft of Jack Hubley? I managed to add 2 more references. I didn't submit it just yet. R2025kt (talk) 17:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I can't view the sources because of the required subscription (I once started a free trial but never subscribed). If the new sources significantly cover the subject and are completely independent, you will have 4 sources to contribute to establishing notability. While not necessary, I suggest you find more secondary sources that are not related to his former employer, programs he runs, or articles he wrote, and if they support all the statements referenced to primary sources, the draft will almost definitely be accepted. I will not review the draft if you submit it again because I cannot verify the sources and I would like another uninvolved reviewer to look at the draft. Feel free to ask any more questions in this topic. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 17:46, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft: Carolizing Christmas
editHello, My draft was recently declined for lack of notability. I included three quotes on the subject from reputable publication with citations. Is this not considered notable? What else can I do to provide evidence of notability? Warner4992 (talk) 07:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Warner4992 While I am not completely sure, it appears this is reference 5. Even though this source is describing the
best live Christmastime performances around the Bay Area
, this is potentially subjective. Additionally, it does not significantly cover the subject. If we do not include this SF Chronicle source, there are 2 out of 3 reliable sources contributing to the general notability guideline. If you find one more reliable source that significantly covers the subject (i.e., several paragraphs about the song itself), then add information supported by the new source, the draft should be accepted. - You can keep the current San Francisco Chronicle source; it will be useful in the final article. Ask me any more questions if you need to. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:48, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
edit |
Hello Hurricane Wind and Fire! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
DYK for Monroe Canyon Fire
edit
On 29 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Monroe Canyon Fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Monroe Canyon Fire became Utah's largest wildfire in five years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Monroe Canyon Fire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Monroe Canyon Fire), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
The Signpost: 1 December 2025
edit- News and notes: Election cycles come and go, and Wikimedia Foundation achieves record revenue in 2024–2025!
Admin and ArbCom elections upcoming, BoT elects two new members, task force advises to close Wikinews and keep Wikispore, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- In the media: Wales walk-off, antisemitism, supernatural powers, feminism turmoil, saints, and sex
Plus mammoth mummy sex-change operation completed!
- Recent research: At least 80 million inconsistent facts on Wikipedia – can AI help find them?
And other recent publications about contradictions and retractions.
- Disinformation report: Epstein email exchanges planned strategy, edits and reported progress
At work on Wikipedia whitewashing. How much should they be paid?
- Traffic report: It's a family affair
Even in these times there is something to be thankful for!
- Book review: The Seven Rules of Trust
Jimmy Wales and Dan Gardner write a book inspired by Wikipedia. What's in it?
- From the archives: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein ..."
The twists and turns of Epstein’s portrayal on Wikipedia.
- Humour: An interview with Wikipe-tan
A conversation about being the mascot of Wikipedia.
- Opinion: AI finds errors in 90% of Wikipedia's best articles
Using ChatGPT to fact-check a month's worth of Today's featured articles.
- Serendipity: Highlights from the itWikiCon 2025
A recap of the latest convention of the Italian Wiki-community, held in Catania from 7–9 November.
- Comix: Madness
It could happen to anyone.
Hello, I didn't use ChatGPT
editI'm really sorry about starting a whole new discussion about this, but this draft I wrote about this company was declined because it looked like some AI wrote it and I am very new to wikipedia and I'm not sure how to communicate to you.
So yeah, I didn't use chatgpt or any AI tool. I did use Grammarly and spell check but that's it. I don't use AI, I hate AI with a passion. Is there some tool I can use to prove otherwise? CarolNotOfTheBells (talk) 10:18, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- I guess that some of the writing appeared to be AI generated (slightly promotional) and if it was just that, I would have declined the draft for not fully adhering to a neutral point of view, but the
(your article name) is... Centena Group
appeared to be the output of a discussion with a large language model. - I am sorry for declining your draft that way, otherwise, I would have declined for a different reason related to the wording of the draft. It appears the main concern to address is now notability. Unfortunately, there is no tool to proof otherwise, but you can edit to address the language not in a neutral point of view or that can appear to be AI generated per Wikipedia:Signs of AI writing.
- Don't worry about starting a new discussion, it's encouraged! If you have any more questions, please ask me! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:30, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- That part (your article name) is.. that part was there when I started working on it, and I thought that was like part of Wikipedia format, so I left it there (yk, like, some sorta code? Where what a user put in there will be like automatically picked up and set as the topic name?)
- I'll keep working on the draft, see if I can make this more neutral CarolNotOfTheBells (talk) 03:53, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Correction to Eric Hacker Para-Athlete
editThank you for reviewing and giving feedback on the pending draft. I have made the corrections you have suggested. Thank you for your contribution! Ericnhacker (talk) 12:22, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- No problem, @Ericnhacker! He appears to be notable enough for an article, and I did not want to have to decline the draft over the date of birth. Cheers! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Do you know who will do the finalization to get it approved? Ericnhacker (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ericnhacker I don't like to review drafts after I've already reviewed/commented on, and most AfC reviewers will not review drafts on request. The draft should be reviewed and accepted by another reviewer (unless they find other errors). Don't worry, there is a backlog drive currently happening, so a reviewer should find your draft soon. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 21:49, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Do you know who will do the finalization to get it approved? Ericnhacker (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Deer Creek Fire
editOn 5 December 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deer Creek Fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Deer Creek Fire developed a nearly stationary fire tornado? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deer Creek Fire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Deer Creek Fire), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Regarding Draft:CWCki and Kiwi Farms
edit@Hurricane Wind and Fire Hello, and thank you for your feedback on my draft! I just wanted to confirm based on your comment that Draft:CWCki has too much shared content with Kiwi Farms, and therefore falls under WP:REDUNDANT regardless of the technically separate topic and should be proposed for a merge at Talk:Kiwi Farms? Alexishere13 (talk) 00:01, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Alexishere13, yes. While a proposed merge would not necessarily be the best option, it would not be a bad idea to begin a regular proposal on the talk page. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so due to the protection of the page, you will be unable to edit the page. Submitting an edit request might be the way to go. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 00:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Regarding Draft: 3 Sided Cube
editHi Hurricane Wind and Fire, I hope you're having a nice day!
I'm contacting you regarding the declining of my draft for the software company 3 Sided Cube. The error says that it shows signs of LLM usage which is frankly really frustrating for me since I took the time to research Wikipedia's article policies and write out everything (including all the linkage) myself manually. I have iterated this article numerous times and I would really appreciate some feedback on how to get this published and what the real reason for the declines are.
I appreciate you're comment being 'Please remove external links from the body of the article, or convert them to inline citations if that is their purpose.' Is there any chance you could be a bit more specific as to what this looks like from my draft's perspective? I'm also wondering if I was to correct this, would the draft then be accepted?
I know you're just maintaining quality across wikipedia and I appreciate that. However I'm struggling to see how to get the article published when there's signs of LLM usage even when I've manually re-written the article numerous times now whilst trying my best to meet all notability requirements. I hope to hear from you soon, have a great day. :) Harry3sidedcube (talk) 11:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Harry3sidedcube, I'm very sorry for declining your draft for LLM usage. However, some of the language combined with the bullet points and bolding throughout the article was similar to some easily identifiable AI-generated drafts I've reviewed in the past. Some language, such as
purpose-led organisations
is in a bit of a gray area: while this information may be true, I can't really find it in the sources provided, so it is not completely in a neutral point of view and can be considered drawing conclusions. Also, it's better for readers to remove bolding words like this in the middle of the draft, unless it is an alternate name recognized by reliable sources, because it goes against this manual of style page. - For changing the external links to inline citations, I am talking about changing "The Virtual Doctors" external link to a reference. However, in this instance, it might be better to move that external link to the external links section. Changing this would not guarantee the draft is accepted, but external links to a website somehow affiliated with the subject of the draft appears promotional, even though your draft is not. Through editing your draft, you might use the citation generator or do it manually. If you type the template yourself, the markup would be similar to this:
- <ref>{{cite web |title=Virtual Doctors |url=https://virtualdoctors.org/ |access-date=December 8, 2025 |website=virtualdoctors.org}}</ref>
- If you were trying to add a link to another Wikipedia article, it is not necessary, although you could consider adding a red link, where the format for a normal link is the same, but the target article will just appear red, like Virtual Doctors. This can encourage other editors to create an article for the subject, as well.
- If you have any more questions, don't be afraid to ask. Hope you're doing well, 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hi again,
- Thank you for the prompt feedback. Even though LLMs have not been used, I have made updates to the article addressing all of your points (language, bold text, bullet points and external links) in hope of it being accepted next time it gets reviewed. I have resubmitted.
- Have a nice evening. Harry3sidedcube (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
1995 Pampa tornado
editI see that I started reviewing this draft and forgot about it, and the bot removed it from my review list. I see that you are now reviewing it, and have tagged the blocking redirect for deletion. Thank you. I have knocked the blocking redirect out of your way, so you can accept the draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Rewritten draft addressing AfC concerns
editThank you for the earlier AfC review. The draft has now been fully rewritten from scratch to address all concerns raised in the decline notice.
Major changes include: • Complete rewrite into a neutral, encyclopaedic tone. • Removal of promotional or subjective language. • All statements now supported exclusively by independent, reliable, published sources. • Removal of internal company material or claims not backed by third-party reporting. • Restructuring to follow standard Wikipedia biography format.
I welcome any further guidance to bring this draft to full compliance with Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability standards.
SusanMCastle (talk) 06:45, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- @SusanMCastle it appears the main concern is now notability. It appears most of the sources do not significantly cover the subject, which is crucial for establishing notability. For example, you could have an article with 150 references, but if only 2 really talk about the subject and the other 148 make very little or no mention, the topic is non-notable. Also, the YouTube sources do not establish notability because they are either unreliable because they are user-generated (anybody can create a YouTube video and say practically anything they want, whether or not it is true), and it can only be considered reliable if it is created by the subject (which means it is primary, and cannot establish notability). If you can find more reliable sources independent of the subject that thoroughly discuss it, Castle should be notable. However, ensure the new information you are adding in adheres to a neutral point of view. Otherwise, the draft will be declined for reading like an advertisement again. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:15, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 December 2025
edit- Interview: Part 1: Bernadette Meehan
Say hello to the new WMF CEO.
- News and notes: We're gonna have a party!
And a new WMF CEO!
- In the media: The "bigg" bosses: Robertsky and the Pope
Pay up, big guys!
- Traffic report: Death and stranger things
And going for the FIFA prize!
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
Something old and something new!
- Obituary: Michal Lewi (Iwelam) and Alan R. King (A R King)
Rest in peace.
- Concept: List of xxtreme sports (redirected from Electrojousting)
You are viewing an old revision of this page, as edited on 2065-11-10 04:33:10.
- Comix: display: flex-inline;
ampersand nb semicolon ampersand nb semicolon ampersand nb semicolon
Your GB
editHello 👋... Signed your guestbook and added it on a list on your behalf. Nice time! Volten001 ☎ 02:00, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:01, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- Most welcome! Volten001 ☎ 02:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Holiday wishes and a happy new year!
edit |
Infinite Possibilities |
| Is this real life? Yes! Is this going to be forever? No! Elvis is getting ready to leave the building and 2026 is about to be born, kicking and screaming. They say nothing gold can stay, but I say, don't listen to them, stay golden all the same. Here's to a new year of infinite diversity and beautiful combinations! Viriditas (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you, same to you and your family! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:43, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the unexpected Christmas present, it was greatly appreciated! Just as a possible piece of follow-up, you rightly declined this draft Draft:Balanda (ethnic group) due to poor sources. Well it got re-submitted, still sourcing was insufficient. So I elected to delve a little deeper to add in the online sources and discovered this was all a bit odd, as you can see. I am at a loss as to what should happen now, beyond another decline, but I thought you could find it interesting. ChrysGalley (talk) 12:20, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out. I haven't seen something like this (granted, I've only been reviewing since early November), but I guess you have taught me to dive deeper into looking at AfC topics. Thanks, and happy holidays to you and your family. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 15:08, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- No I don't think you needed to have done anything more, the sources were too poor anyway. I only decided to add the online sourcing since I had the time and it's an area of interest to me, and it was only then that a DOI was not all it seemed. Merry Christmas, as we say over here, or indeed Eid milad majid ! ChrysGalley (talk) 15:20, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
AfC Declines
editHowdy; You had declined two submissions made by the author of this draft: Draft:Neel Nayak — I believe the author may be Nayak themselves, and have asked for clarification on their "disclosed" COI (they vaguely assert they have a COI on their User page) over on their Talk page. Further, I believe this user is extensively utilizing an LLM to write these articles, at least the Nayak article and their User page. The other two are too short to judge. Anyways, I wanted to to let you know in case you see more of their submissions. Cheers - MWFwiki (talk) 12:06, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. It is pretty clear the Nayak draft is AI-generated. I'll let you know if I review any more drafts that are AI-generated or promotional. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 15:25, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Magnetoglobus. multicellularis
editHello, I understand completely why my article was declined, as this as one of my first attempts at a serious contribution to Wikipedia. My only concern is that my laptop shut down while I was in editor mode 2 hours ago, and when it came back online, an updated version of my article seemed to have disappeared, as I had written a few more paragraphs about such as one titles "motility". I understand that I cannot publish my article, and with good and fair reason. But I would still like to download a copy of my draft for personal use, and now my most recent draft is gone.
Thank you in advance, from CuniformCuniform CuniformCuniform (talk) 21:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- @CuniformCuniform on the Tools bar (which should be on your sidebar or top of your screen near the "Edit" or "Edit source" button is), in the Print/export section, there is an option to download your draft as a PDF.
- Changes are not published until you press the blue "Publish changes" button, so unfortunately, if something like this happens again, your changes won't be saved.
- One tip, though: Once you come to a point during a major edit where you have to stop editing for some reason, copy and paste the wikitext with your changes into a Word document and save. This has saved me before, I hope it does the same for you.
- If you would like clarification or have more questions, please ask me. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 21:57, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Hurricane Wind and Fire!
edit
Hurricane Wind and Fire,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
This is the person that sends you emails every day
edithi hhi ~2025-44009-72 (talk) 21:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry? Please do not leave troll edits on my talk page. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:29, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
December 2025 AfC backlog drive award
edit |
Bronze Wiki Award |
| This is awarded to Hurricane Wind and Fire for accumulating more than 808.5 points and being the user with the third highest score during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process were crucial in reviewing over 9,000 drafts during the drive. Thank you for your participation and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:28, 11 January 2026 (UTC) |
December 2025 AfC backlog drive re-reviews award
edit |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
| Many people review drafts. You review the reviewers. You peer-reviewed the peer reviewers and supported your fellow Wikipedians. :) This is awarded to Hurricane Wind and Fire for completing more than 50 re-reviews during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Thank you for your efforts and teamwork! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:21, 12 January 2026 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 15 January 2026
edit- News and notes: Wikipedia's 25th anniversary is here!
Where does the time go?
- Special report: Wikipedia at 25: A Wake-Up Call
The internet is booming. We are not.
- Serendipity: The WMF wants to buy you books!
Really! A major triumph.
- WikiProject report: Time for a health check: the Vital Signs 2026 campaign
The campaign to get all of our top-importance medical articles up to B-class or above.
- In the media: Fake Acting President Trump and a Wikipedia infobox
D.J.T. assumes a new position.
- Community view: The inbox behind Wikipedia
What the Volunteer Response Team actually does!
- Recent research: Art museums on Wikidata; comparing three comparisons of Grokipedia and Wikipedia
And other research.
- Traffic report: Tonight I'm gonna rock you tonight
A world in white gets underway.
- Comix: Oh come on man.
Really?
Still Editing...
editHey, I just want to let you know that I am back in the mood to edit wildfire pages again. I haven't really been to active as of late due to me getting burned out from school (bullying, tests, etc.). Of course, the whole "AI" thing has gotten passed me. I used AI to assist me on ~50 edits or so from August 2025 - October 2025. You may have seen that I created the 2026 Oklahoma wildfires page. I can't wait to make more. I just finished creating my Guestbook. You can be my first signature! CostalCal (talk) 07:31, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's good you're coming back! I was getting worried I had made you upset and was the reason you had lowered your activity. Sorry about what is happening in school, I hope it gets better. Again, I'm happy you're coming back! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:21, 20 January 2026 (UTC)