HistoryGuy2022

Welcome!

Hello, HistoryGuy2022!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 06:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on José de León Toral

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page José de León Toral, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Pre-Columbian era

I have reverted your addition of an excessive number of citations to Pre-Columbian era. One quality reliable source that supports the content of a sentence or paragraph is sufficient. Adding citations that do not support anything that is not already supported by existing citations clutters the article, and may be considered book spam. If you still feel that any of those sources need to be cited in the article, please present your reasons at Talk:Pre-Columbian era. - Donald Albury 15:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

No problem HistoryGuy2022 (talk) 05:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Los Feliz, Los Angeles, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:13, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Butterfly (2025 TV series) has been accepted

Butterfly (2025 TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raya Yarbrough (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raya Yarbrough and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:01, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, HistoryGuy2022! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 13:01, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Andrew Garfield

I've reverted your edit to Andrew Garfield as the source you provided made no unambiguous claims that Garfield is dating anyone; it appeared largely speculative, and we don't publish gossip. Please read your sources more carefully before adding statements to Wikipedia that aren't actually supported by the sources you're using. DonIago (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

No problem thank you for letting me know HistoryGuy2022 (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Raya Yarbrough

Hello, HistoryGuy2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raya Yarbrough, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi HistoryGuy2022. Thank you for your work on José Joaquín Pérez Budar. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add footnotes to back up each claim and establish notability as per WP:NBIO. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:53, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Noted thank you i will. HistoryGuy2022 (talk) 02:19, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

José Joaquín Pérez Budar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to José Joaquín Pérez Budar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and require WP:RS, WP:IS. Please refer to WP:REFB for instructions on formatting references correctly.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 08:28, 11 March 2026 (UTC)