Heyitsuraj

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aurea Aviation Private Limited (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rambley were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aurea Aviation Private Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 09:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Heyitsuraj! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk / contribs) 09:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Rambley,

Thank you for reviewing the draft and for the guidance. I understand the concerns regarding notability and sourcing, and I appreciate the time you took to explain them.

I will look for additional independent, reliable secondary sources that provide in-depth coverage of the subject and will revise the draft accordingly before resubmitting. If such sources cannot be found, I understand that the topic may not be suitable for inclusion at this time.

Thank you again for your help.

Best regards,

Heyitsuraj Heyitsuraj (talk) 11:31, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aurea Aviation Private Limited (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The Times of India is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aurea Aviation Private Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:31, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theroadislong (talk) 11:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Theroadislong,

Thank you for the clarification and for taking the time to review the draft.

I understand the concerns regarding the reliability of the sources, the notability requirements, and the suitability of the content. I will not resubmit the draft unless I am able to find multiple independent, reliable secondary sources that provide substantial coverage of the subject, and I will ensure that any future edits are written manually based directly on such sources.

Thank you again for the guidance.

Regards,

Heyitsuraj ~2026-40618-9 (talk) 12:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)