GuyLuck

February 2025

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. An edit that you recently made to Keith Dowding seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Tacyarg for your kind response.. Actually I was practicing and did some minor edits to check whether how things are working.. Anyways I will take care of the things from now onwards..

Regards.. GuyLuck (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Genesis: A Thriller of Science, Faith, and Betrayal in the Heart of Paris (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Genesis: A Thriller of Science, Faith, and Betrayal in the Heart of Paris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, GuyLuck! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Genesis (A Novel) by Lenin Dev (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Taabii were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Genesis (A Novel) by Lenin Dev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taabii (talk) 16:47, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Lenin Dev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lenin Dev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenin Dev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dam222 🌋 (talk) 02:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Great decision Dam222... I will try my best to improve the article by collecting relevant details suiting the article. Meanwhile we can discuss on the deletion process as well.. GuyLuck (talk) 14:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Genesis (Dev novel)

Hello GuyLuck, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Genesis (Dev novel), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis (Dev novel).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 09:45, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, GuyLuck. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Some of the edits have been very promotional in tone. If you have been paid or otherwise asked to edit on behalf of another, you must disclose this. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:38, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Tone, other notes

Please be careful of tone. Content must be written in a neutral point of view. Some of your content has marketing WP:BUZZWORDS and sounds promotional. For example, you can't say that an event was memorable because that's an opinion. So saying "it was a memorable evening" violates the WP:NPOV guidelines.

You also cannot come to your own conclusions. We can only summarize what has been explicitly stated in reliable sources - which absolutely must be in the article. So for example, you made the conclusion that his university contributed to his skills. While that's extremely likely, stating that is still original research. The only time you could include something like that is if he were to make a comment about the school being influential on him.

Then there's sourcing. Everything must be backed up by a reliable source. There are roughly two types of sourcing that can be used in an article: WP:PRIMARY and non-primary sources. Per Wikipedia's definition, a primary sources "are original materials that are close to an event, and are often accounts written by people who are directly involved." So for example, if the New York Times wrote about one of its journalists, that would be a primary source - however if the Washington Post wrote about the journalist, it would not be primary since the journalist has never worked for them.

Now, not every source can establish notability and some shouldn't be used as a source at all. Reviews can count towards notability, but only if they're published in a reputable, independent, secondary source, like a newspaper. Reviews on a merchant website like Amazon or a place like Goodreads that accepts reviews from anyone would not be considered a reliable source. As it's assumed that books will receive reviews on places like this, reviews on these outlets are irrelevant to Wikipedia. Be extremely careful of any self-published source like a blog - most are not useable for notability purposes because anyone can publish a blog. The blog's popularity doesn't count towards it being reliable - what's needed is proof that other reliable sources see it as reliable - especially academic and scholarly sources, as they tend to be pretty picky on what they use. Merchant sources are heavily discouraged from use on an article. In most cases it's only usable to back up basic claims, which can often be done by other, less controversial sources. In worst case scenarios there have been cases of people using it to try and steer readers to purchase an item, but that isn't necessarily always why it was added.

Finally, please do not mark an edit as minor (WP:ME) if it is not minor. Minor edits are considered to be things like fixing spelling or grammatical errors in an article. Adding new content to an article is not a minor edit. It's only meant to be used for cases where you're making superficial edits to the article, where you're neither adding nor removing any content. Even then, if you are doing major rearranging it's better to not mark it as a minor edit. From what I can see, many of your minor edits are not minor. Please stop marking the edits as minor.

I heavily recommend that you review Wikipedia's guidelines for editing. If you do have a conflict of interest, then it's extremely important that you follow guidelines. It's also heavily recommended that you not edit directly on any topic where you have a conflict of interest. If you want to create articles with a conflict of interest, you should only create them via AfC and never try to move them live yourself. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:01, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, GuyLuck, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

GuyLuck, good luck, and have fun. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:44, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Shridhar University for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shridhar University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shridhar University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 04:44, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Genesis: A Thriller of Science, Faith, and Betrayal in the Heart of Paris

Hello, GuyLuck. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Genesis: A Thriller of Science, Faith, and Betrayal in the Heart of Paris, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Genesis (A Novel) by Lenin Dev

Hello, GuyLuck. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Genesis (A Novel) by Lenin Dev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Genesis: A Thriller of Science, Faith, and Betrayal in the Heart of Paris

Hello, GuyLuck. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Genesis: A Thriller of Science".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:25, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Genesis (A Novel) by Lenin Dev

Hello, GuyLuck. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Genesis (A Novel) by Lenin Dev".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 14 August 2025 (UTC)