Hello, GoogleOperator, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! -- Least Action (talk) 00:36, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Minnastronomer, left the following feedback:
Hello, GoogleOperator!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Minnastronomer (talk) 06:44, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Contributor Appeal
Hey, listen: This article was 100% human-authored and never generated by any LLM. I invested a significant amount of hard work into crafting this piece, ensuring that every single point of content is meticulously and correctly cited.
Please re-review this submission. This is a massive community event that genuinely deserves historical relevance. Documenting and preserving history like this is, at its core, exactly what Wikipedia is all about. GoogleOperator (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Despite, your claims, not a reference links to an existing article. As none of the sources seem to actually exist, I have to decline this. The official website linked to also has no reference to this event. I cannot begin to change my verdict until I see some evidence that this event actually exists. Minnastronomer (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft does not have sufficient content to warrant a standalone article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Lego Architecture.
Edit the existing article to include your text and citations into an appropriate section.
If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's Talk page.
It's probably WP:TOOSOON to determine if this set is notable enough for a standalone page. Merging into the current Lego Architecture article is probably the best course of action, and a seperate article could always be WP:SPLIT off in the future.
Latest comment: 6 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Avgeekamfot, left the following feedback:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Sawgrass Marriott to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
