User talk:GamerPro64/Archive 12
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:GamerPro64. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Crispy Gamer for FA
This time, I shall follow the rules. Are you interested in improving the article so that I can nominate it for the status? Gamingforfun365 (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Gamingforfun365: Why can't he just improve the article and nominate it himself? I don't understand why you want to nominate articles for FA-status when you haven't worked on them. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- For two reasons:
- a. There is fairly much nothing that I can do to improve the article, and
- b. I have recently promoted the article after reviewing it.
- I really am desperate to know how to do this FAC business (I had similar trouble with doing the GAN business for video game controversies).
Gamingforfun365 (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)- So you're so desperate to get a Featured Article to nominate something you barely worked on? At this point I don't want you to post on my talk page with an attitude like that. GamerPro64 18:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @Gamingforfun365: Point B is irrelevant. Point A goes against your argument. If you are not knowledgeable on the topic and cannot help improve the article, then you cannot address the oppositions that may be brought up at FAC. Therefore, you should not be nominating the article for FAC. End of story. You are not going to learn anything about FAC by drive-by nominating articles that you have not contributed to. If you want to learn about FAC then I suggest you find an article/topic that you have an interest in and are knowledge of and start improving it. Many editors would perceive your actions on Crispy Gamer as trying to take the credit for doing no work. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- What if I were to tell you that I am interested in this topic and that I am fact-checking?
Gamingforfun365 (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)- If you interested in it then great. But what about the parts where you are knowledgable of the topic and make some significant contribution to the article? You already admitted that you can do nothing to improve the article... Also, given that you already conducted the GA review, you should have already "fact-checked" the article to ensure information met WP:V. So you're not really doing anything but drive-by nominating it. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, maybe I am wrong.
Gamingforfun365 (talk) 18:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)- Instead of arguing, should I delete this discussion? I was only trying to follow the instructions by consulting a regular editor of an article.
Gamingforfun365 (talk) 19:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)- Just stop posting on my talk page. And please do not remove this thread from my talk page. GamerPro64 19:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Instead of arguing, should I delete this discussion? I was only trying to follow the instructions by consulting a regular editor of an article.
- Well, maybe I am wrong.
- If you interested in it then great. But what about the parts where you are knowledgable of the topic and make some significant contribution to the article? You already admitted that you can do nothing to improve the article... Also, given that you already conducted the GA review, you should have already "fact-checked" the article to ensure information met WP:V. So you're not really doing anything but drive-by nominating it. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- What if I were to tell you that I am interested in this topic and that I am fact-checking?
Should I start a GAR for Crispy Gamer, as I have initially not fact-checked the article to make sure that it is accurate and reviewed the article in haste? Gamingforfun365 (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I also largely did not fact-check the other three articles that I have reviewed; I have mostly only pointed out the obvious issues.
Gamingforfun365 (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)- One, no. Do not start of a GAR just yet. Actually fact-check the articles and determine they don't meet the Good Article criteria. Second, have you actually read the criteria for Good Articles? Third, actually take reviewing articles seriously. If you're not fact-checking or following the criteria for reviewing, you shouldn't be doing it in the first place. Again, not ready the rules of Wikipedia will get you anywhere. GamerPro64 05:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- This is why I do not like reviewing articles: it is boring and long, and I just do not have the patience, which explains why I am relatively hyper in my editing. No way that I am ever going to review a GAN again; I hate it. Just saying that I do not like it. Finally, I am actually editing Crispy Gamer.
Gamingforfun365 (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)- I tried it because I thought that I would like it, but it is too long for someone with hyperactivity, so I quit as a reviewer.
Gamingforfun365 (talk) 03:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)- Okay. Can you please stop posting on my talk page? I've already asked you before. GamerPro64 03:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- I tried it because I thought that I would like it, but it is too long for someone with hyperactivity, so I quit as a reviewer.
- This is why I do not like reviewing articles: it is boring and long, and I just do not have the patience, which explains why I am relatively hyper in my editing. No way that I am ever going to review a GAN again; I hate it. Just saying that I do not like it. Finally, I am actually editing Crispy Gamer.
- One, no. Do not start of a GAR just yet. Actually fact-check the articles and determine they don't meet the Good Article criteria. Second, have you actually read the criteria for Good Articles? Third, actually take reviewing articles seriously. If you're not fact-checking or following the criteria for reviewing, you shouldn't be doing it in the first place. Again, not ready the rules of Wikipedia will get you anywhere. GamerPro64 05:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Admin
The rack of green in the chart at BN is indicative of this being a really good start to the year for admin candidates.
I've had a look back at some recentish RfAs and found yours.
I'm inclined to encourage you to go through it all again, but the big question first is...
...do you think you've addressed some of the more substantial oppose issues during the intervening months?
Cheers and happy new year (and of course it's fine to say "no way, not again" - I know RfA is bruising) --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think I addressed the opposes issues lately. If anyone wants to nominate me they can. GamerPro64 17:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Can I suggest you undertake one of these to test the waters? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- I already taken one of those. GamerPro64 15:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I've reviewed it. Feedback was generally positive. Negatives were mostly about things that were then (some time ago). Except for this one:
- 6/10 - my feelings toward your adminship remain the same since your first RfA, but you'll have the following battles ahead: it has been less than a year since your last RfA, relative lack of AfD !voting experience, and lack of article creation. None of these are insurmountable, given the length and quality of your contributions in other areas. Therefore I think you have a better than 50% chance of passing if you ran today, but it isn't a gimme, unfortunately
"less than a year" - you're OK on that now "lack of AfD !voting" - have you been active there since? "lack of article creation" - I'd ignore that, or rather, be up front about it. Not everyone needs to be an article creator. You need to demonstrate sensitivity to those that are and an understanding of the issues around content. There aren't many Ealdgyths around, sadly, but Wikipedia needs gnome admins too, in areas such as vandal fighting, page moves etc Whaddaya fink? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Seconded! You'd make a good admin and already have my strong support -- Samtar talk · contribs 10:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
NB a decent track record (both in terms of quantity and quality) at AfD can be a useful too for helping reassure other Wikipedians that you understand content issues. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 11:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Okay. I am interested in going to at it again. I don't do much for AfD as I'm more interested in speedy deletions. But I would like to take part in AfD more in terms of admin assistance. GamerPro64 15:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- A good record with speedies is useful, but if you say you want to participate in AfD as an admin, I suggest you settle into it for a month or two as a participant first. If you're less interested in AfD, I'd say go for RfA now. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm honestly not really interested in AfD. But at the same time, there would be concern about what I would be doing as an admin. Would just wanting to contribute to speedy deletions be enough? GamerPro64 16:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- No need for the tools is a common oppose. Ealdgyth responded by citing an interest in WP:ERRORS. I see no reason why your interest in speedy wouldn't be valid. You have a track record, you say. Wikipedians will just need to look at that track record and see whether they like it. Not having an interest in AfD is fine - it's not a requirement and it's better to say that than to imply you'll go stomping in without knowing anything and break things :-) --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 16:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Okay. That makes sense. So I guess the idea is to do a self-nom, though I don't know how well those do in comparison to people nominating others. GamerPro64 16:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- I don't either. Give me a few days to review you and if I'm happy with what I see, I could nominate you? Either way, I'd recuse from closing / Cratchat. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 17:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Okay. That makes sense. So I guess the idea is to do a self-nom, though I don't know how well those do in comparison to people nominating others. GamerPro64 16:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- No need for the tools is a common oppose. Ealdgyth responded by citing an interest in WP:ERRORS. I see no reason why your interest in speedy wouldn't be valid. You have a track record, you say. Wikipedians will just need to look at that track record and see whether they like it. Not having an interest in AfD is fine - it's not a requirement and it's better to say that than to imply you'll go stomping in without knowing anything and break things :-) --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 16:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm honestly not really interested in AfD. But at the same time, there would be concern about what I would be doing as an admin. Would just wanting to contribute to speedy deletions be enough? GamerPro64 16:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- A good record with speedies is useful, but if you say you want to participate in AfD as an admin, I suggest you settle into it for a month or two as a participant first. If you're less interested in AfD, I'd say go for RfA now. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
Building toward better recruitment and retention
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
A close look at the history of approving administrators on English Wikipedia, and a roundup of news
- Interview: What is it like to edit Wikipedia when you're blind?
The wiki environment can appear deceptively uniform, but it masks strikingly different editorial experiences
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
The latest media reports
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
Twelve articles, thirteen lists and twelve pictures were promoted
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
Various minor developments
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
If you're reading this, you escaped 2016 alive
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
Data sets now available on Commons, wishes to be worked on in 2017, and a recap of the Wikimedia Developer Summit
- Recent research: Female Wikipedians aren't more likely to edit women biographies; Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia
And several other research papers reviewed and summarized
AC report
Hi, just a few items on the AC report:
- Thank you for clarifying the site ban issue. I'm still not 100% understanding; was Captain Occam first topic banned in 2010, then site-banned later that year?
- Did the wrong year. He was site banned in 2012. GamerPro64 02:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Any plans to pursue the interviews you had discussed? Did you get my email response?
- I do plan to pursue the interviews but haven't gotten started due to getting ready for classes starting up again. GamerPro64 02:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- In a few places, you say "the Committee". This should be either "the committee" or "ArbCom" -- I don't have a strong preference either way, you can mix them as you like.
- I'm sorry, I don't remember if we've discussed; would you like to join Slack, the chat platform we use to put together each issue? If so, let me know, and I'll send you an invitation via email. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- I've never used Slack before. Do I need to sign up or get an app or something? GamerPro64 02:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Peteforsyth: Pinging you about the Slack thing. GamerPro64 01:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping -- just getting past the production whirlwind and resuming other stuff. I just sent you an invitation by email (check your spam folder if you don't see it). If you've ever used IRC, it's very similar in structure, but with a much nicer user interface; there's a web app, and also an app you can download (Mac, PC, Linux, mobile). Let me know if you have difficulty. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Gamer,
I was wondering if you notified anyone from WP:HOCKEY about your nomination for this topic for FTRC. I looked at WT:HOCKEY, User talk:Scorpion0422, and User talk:Maxim, and it looks like none of them were notified.
I am no longer active, so please notify me once you have replied. Kind regards. --K.Annoyomous (talk) 08:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- I did notify the Hockey WikiProject before taking it for review. No one replied to me so I thought they were inactive. Also thought so with the editors you mentioned. But of course the topic can always be taken back to FTC once everything's in order. GamerPro64 15:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey, you had done a source review, could you also check the formatting? A coordinator has requested a formatting check. --JDC808 ♫ 04:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Permission to use figure in a book.
Dear GamerPro64,
I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:
We are hoping to include the picture of yours (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fd/Donkey_Kong_Gameplay.png) in this book (Chapter 1, Figure 1.27b). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you.
Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.8.92.79 (talk) 11:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
RfC on "No paid editing for Admins" at WT:COI
I've relisted an RfC that was run at WT:Admin in Sept. 2015. It is at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Concrete proposal 3 as there are a number of similar proposals going on at the same place. Better to keep them together. Smallbones(smalltalk) 04:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
The two statements prompt extensive community discussion; plus, our updates on recent ArbCom decisions
- Special report: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Undisclosed paid editing by a financial broker mired in scandal spans years, impacting Wikipedia's editors and readers
- News and notes: Official WMF rebuke to Trump policy; WMF secures restricted funds
Foundation's latest foray into political waters, and grants funding structured data and anti-harassment measures, met with enthusiasm and concern
- In focus: WMF strategy consultant brings background in crisis reputation management; Team behind popular WMF software put "on pause"
Several developments in the $2.5 million strategic planning process explored, and a team within the software production department is sidelined
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
Our second interview with the productive WikiProject Birds crew
- Op-ed: How to make editing workshops useful, even if participants don't stick around
Veteran editing workshop leader responds to a previous Signpost op-ed
- In the media: Presidential politics, periodic table, and our periodic roundup of updates
Wikipedia's response to Trump inauguration and a fruitful, public "edit war" lead our media updates
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
Plus the latest scripts, bots, and tech news
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
Three weeks of the most popular Wikipedia articles
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
Twenty-eight articles, seven lists, two topics and four pictures were promoted
- Forum: Productive collaboration around coordinated protest marches; Media and political personalities comment on Wikipedia at its 16th birthday celebration
Women's marches on seven continents attracted strong Wikipedia engagement; Media luminaries and a presidential candidate joined WMF boss Katherine Maher at a New York gathering
Hey, long time no see! Thanks for the kind words about Phantasmagoria (video game), I enjoyed working on that one. Unfortunately I've not really had much time to dedicate to Wikipedia lately, and as much as I'd love to bring it to FAC some time, I fear I might not have the time investment to dedicate to such an intensive review. Maybe in the future some time though! — Hunter Kahn 14:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'd be game for it, if you want to list us as co-nominators or whatever. I'll do what I can to respond to questions and whatnot... :) — Hunter Kahn 15:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm coming to you because of your technical abilities. If you can not solve this problem, can you direct to somebody that can. [Recently I had a GA review on this above article and it passed. This was on 6 February 2017. However, there is NOT a green icon on the article itself indicating it is a Good Article. Maybe GA1 messed it up, or whatever. Can you figure out how to place a green icon on the article or pass onto somebody that can? Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Just add template:Good article somewhere on the page after it passes. Recommend at the bottom. GamerPro64 14:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- O.K. = thanks! --Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
The Signpost's poll suggests we should take a cautious approach to the Newsletter Extension, under development; and our RSS feed is functional once again
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
This month's edition focuses on research about the role of Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
Demonstrations of developers' experiments and works in progress
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
Is the Daily Mail fake news and your media roundup
- Gallery: A Met montage
A selection of CC0 images from the Metropolitan Museum of Art
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
An overview of English Wikipedia's peer review process
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
Increased WMF spending every year is not sustainable
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
Fifteen articles, two lists, and six pictures were promoted
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
They may not mix in life, but they do in popularity
- Blog: WikiIndaba 2017: A continent gathers to chart a path forward
Republished from the Wikimedia blog
Daily Dot
It looks to be a kind of blog, and not a reliable source, especially for serious allegations. Allegations would need significant coverage by reliable sources to warrant inclusion in an article. Harizotoh9 (talk) 23:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Permission to use figure in book.
I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:
We are hoping to include the picture of yours:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fd/Donkey_Kong_Gameplay.png
in this book (Chapter 1, Figure 1.25b). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you.
Sincerely,
Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.8.254.8 (talk) 10:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Didn't you guys ask me this last month? You guys can use it but its not my image? I got it from a website. GamerPro64 16:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Re: Good News
Awesome! Thanks for seeing the FAC through, man. Much appreciated! — Hunter Kahn 02:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Holiday card
| Wishing you a Charlie Russell Christmas, GamerPro64! |
| "Here's hoping that the worst end of your trail is behind you That Dad Time be your friend from here to the end And sickness nor sorrow don't find you." —C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1926. Montanabw(talk) 23 December 2016 (UTC) |
GT question
Hello there. I'm looking to nominate the Marvel vs. Capcom series for good topic status soon, but before that, I had a question about the Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite article, a game that won't be released until (supposedly) the end of this year. I know that I can have it added to the topic later, but I was wondering if there is anything I should do with the article now (or if I'm supposed to refrain from nominating until the game is released or something). Thank you for your time. Wani (talk) 14:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- It needs to have a completed Peer Review before nomination. GamerPro64 14:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Another question. If the peer review goes unanswered for over a month and I close it, does that count as 'completed'? I also might make a post on WP:VG's talk page asking for feedback, if that's allowed. Wani (talk) 00:08, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah it would count as completed. GamerPro64 00:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- @GamerPro64: Hey, sorry to bother you again. Am I allowed to make a post on WT:VG asking for opinions about my nomination, or is that against procedure? Wani (talk) 11:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- You can do that. GamerPro64 13:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- @GamerPro64: Hey, sorry to bother you again. Am I allowed to make a post on WT:VG asking for opinions about my nomination, or is that against procedure? Wani (talk) 11:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah it would count as completed. GamerPro64 00:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Another question. If the peer review goes unanswered for over a month and I close it, does that count as 'completed'? I also might make a post on WP:VG's talk page asking for feedback, if that's allowed. Wani (talk) 00:08, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
GT Re-promotion
With the promotion of the only gap that remained, Wikipedia:Featured topics/James Bond films is complete again. Does it need to be nominated again to get the GT status properly restored? igordebraga ≠ 02:49, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
I tried, but the process is not automated, and I guess I messed up some code. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The Fine Young Capitalists good article re-assessment
The Fine Young Capitalists, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PeterTheFourth (talk) 07:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Featured topic
Template:Featured topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
- From the editors: Signpost status: On reserve power, help wanted!
Inviting new writers, editors, and ideas
- News and notes: Global Elections
WMF Board election results, and FDC elections begin
- Arbitration report: Cases closed in the Pacific and with Magioladitis
Two cases were closed from 19 February to 27 March.
- Op-ed: Wikipedia's lead sentence problem
Lead sentence metadata is out of control and a serious impediment to readability
- Featured content: Three months in the land of the featured
Eighty-eight articles, forty-three lists, five topics and twenty-two pictures were promoted
- In the media: Did Wikipedia just assume Garfield's gender?
Garfield is male, and other places Wikipedia made the news
- Recent research: Wikipedia bot wars capture the imagination of the popular press
...but are they real?; personality and attitudes to Wikipedia; large expert review experiment
- Technology report: Tech news catch-up
Bots, scripts, tools, and changes from February to June 2017
- Traffic report: Film on Top: Sampling the weekly top 10
Two weeks of film dominance: Baahubali and the Academy Awards
POTD notification

Hi Gamer,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Jean Cocteau b Meurisse 1923.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on July 5, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-07-05. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
- News and notes: Departments reorganized at Wikimedia Foundation, and a month without new RfAs (so far)
While the English Wikipedia community produces no new requests for adminhood in June, the Wikimedia Foundation makes changes to the Product and Technology departments.
- In the media: Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
The anatomy of Uber CEO Travis Kalanick's chest area has been the talk of the month. But so have high-profile edits, hacked articles, and one particular newborn growing up.
- Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take
Exploring sourcing issues in Wikimedia projects, a solution in Wikidata and fact mining, and a newsletter to continue the conversation.
- Featured content: Will there ever be a break? The slew of featured content continues
22 featured articles, 17 featured lists, 7 featured pictures
- Traffic report: Wonder Woman beats Batman, The Mummy, Darth Vader and the Earth
Summer blockbusters and sports, Trump and world events.
- Recent research: Utopian bubbles: Can Wikipedians create value outside of the capitalist system?
A researcher applies Marxist critiques of political economy to investigate whether gamification, a culture of altruism, and other anti-corporatist influences on peer production can create a sustainable gift economy in a project like Wikipedia.
- Technology report: Improved search, and WMF data scientist tells all
Search now can include sister projects; EpochFail
Quick Question
Hey Gamer. Just a quick question about good topic/featured topic candidates. I've been looking around, but perhaps in the wrong places. Can you nominate more than one topic at a time to undergo the candidate process? I can't find a statement anywhere regarding this, but maybe there is. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 05:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC).
- To answer your question you can nominate more than one topic. I recommend it being two so it doesn't clog the system. Also I suggest putting your two cents into any nominations that have barely any discussion so they can go by faster. GamerPro64 03:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 July 2017
- News and notes: French chapter woes, new affiliates and more WMF team changes
The English Wikipedia sees its first new admin of the season, discord rocks Wikimedia France, some tweaks to the WMF reorg, and a new WMF annual plan mark this issue's community news.
- Featured content: Spectacular animals, Pine Trees screens, and more
Recently promoted articles, lists, and pictures.
- In the media: Concern about access and fairness, Foundation expenditures, and relationship to real-world politics and commerce
A grab bag of alt-right speech, classical scholars, the dark web, elicited European tourism, $500,000 golden parachutes, forgery, the Great Firewall, net neutrality, nukes, paid editing, porn, and terrorism.
- Recent research: The chilling effect of surveillance on Wikipedia readers
A closer look at the research that found that the 2013 Snowden revelations coincided with a significant drop of pageviews for privacy-sensitive Wikipedia articles
- Op-ed: Why Task Forces are Dying in 2017
...and is there anything we can do to stop it? Opinions and examples from across the project.
- Gallery: A mix of patterns
An interesting mix of patterns and colors to brighten your day...
- Humour: The Infobox Game
Enjoy the Parameters: The Infobox Game can be enjoyed by everyone, not just those interested in water buffalo breeds, volcanic hotspots or the mysterious heteroisoform, and some day just might spawn an important facet of the financial derivatives industry.
- Traffic report: Film, television and Internet phenomena reign with some room left over for America's birthday
Popular interest in celebrities, blockbusters and an upcoming season of a popular television show drive traffic, with a smattering of world events, holidays and a Reddit storm around – surprise – free porn for the U.S. Congress.
- Technology report: New features in development; more breaking changes for scripts
Syntax highlighting, changes to Recent Changes, Wikidata on the enhance watchlist, accessible editing buttons and jQuery upgrade may break scripts.
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 3 wrap-up
The heat turns up on the 32 contestants who entered round three: 13 featured articles, 82 good articles, 167 DYKs, but we had to pick just eight of them to advance.
On this day, 9 years ago...
Talkback

Message added 05:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You might be able to answer my question I posted there, as well. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 05:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Comment regarding Throne of Fire GA nom
Hi there Gamer, just wanted to let you know that I was about to review Throne of Fire, however, it needs some copy editing before it is ready to be reviewed. I have done some of the work but was wondering if you wanted to work with it some more before I started the review? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- If you want to go ahead with the review by all means start it up. It'll probably help with any specific issues the article has. GamerPro64 04:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, I don't feel comfortable with you reviewing the article after looking at Talk:Clock Tower II: The Struggle Within/GA1. I'd rather have a more seasoned editor look at my article instead. GamerPro64 04:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Fair enough, however, it was a mistake that was quickly remedied here (Talk:Clock Tower II: The Struggle Within/GA2, ). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Renga (video game)
Hello! Your submission of Renga (video game) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 August 2017
- News and notes: Non-English special edition! 99% no news about English-based wiki communities!
Wikimania in Montreal, lawsuit in Sweden, challenges in France
- Recent research: Wikipedia can increase local tourism by +9%; predicting article quality with deep learning; recent behavior predicts quality
Local tourism gains +9% when Wikipedia articles are improved; significant improvements in predicting article quality with deep learning; recent editor behavior is a strong predictor of content quality
- WikiProject report: Comic relief
An interview with a project that is centered around comics.
- In the media: Wikipedia used to judge death penalty, arms smuggling, Indonesian governance, and HOTTEST celebrity
Wikipedia and reliable sources of information continue to define each other
- Traffic report: Swedish countess tops the list
Plus plenty of sports, film, and television
- Blog: Canadian Supreme Court rules against Google in favor of worldwide court orders
The Canadian Supreme Court ruled that Google must remove search results worldwide, dismissing concerns that this may impede freedom of expression for people outside of Canada or inspire other countries to censor speech.
- Special report: Sharing Wikipedia offline medical information in the Dominican Republic
Wikimedia contributors support each other's projects in many unexpected ways
- Featured content: Everywhere in the lead
Recently promoted articles, lists and pictures – with a very heavy one in the mix
- Technology report: Introducing TechCom
The Architecture Committee adopts a new charter and name; and the latest in script, bot, and tech news
- Humour: WWASOHs and ETCSSs
An elite squad of highly insightful editors can lead the way for other editors who may need to retrain their faces into forming a smile.
DYK for Renga (video game)
On 10 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Renga (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Renga is a video game designed for movie theaters, in which up to one hundred players use laser pointers to control and defend a space ship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Renga (video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Renga (video game)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 6 September 2017
- From the editors: What happened at Wikimania?
Please share your Wikimania 2017 experiences!
- News and notes: Basselpedia; WMF Board of Trustees appointments
Some of the goings-on from Wikimania 2017.
- Featured content: Warfighters and their tools or trees and butterflies
Take your pick of the best of Wikipedia.
- Traffic report: A fortnight of conflicts
White supremacists v. anti-fascism groups, Mayweather v. McGregor, Moon v. Sun.
- Special report: Biomedical content, and some thoughts on its future
Wikipedia's medical and scientific content has come a long way since 2001. Here are some thoughts on how it may continue to evolve.
- Recent research: Discussion summarization; Twitter bots tracking government edits; extracting trivia from Wikipedia
A list of recent research publications on various topics.
- In the media: Google's Ideological Echo Chamber; What makes someone successful?
Plus the latest reports of vandalism and mistakes in Wikipedia.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject YouTube
WikiProject YouTube is a new project on both English and Simple English Wikipedia.
- Technology report: Latest tech news
Syntax highlighting, failed login notifications, watchlist filters, and more.
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 4 wrap-up
Ships, typhoons, birds, and more!
- Humour: Bots
They do the things you don't want to do (and sometimes things you don't want done).
The Signpost: 25 September 2017
- News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL
News from Wikimedia France, Wikimedia Macedonia, and Wikimedia Israel's; Autoconfirmed article creation trial begins
- In the media: Monkey settlement; Wikipedia used to give AI context clues
Also: Jeopedia, Dubaipedia, shaping science, fake quote reused by scholarly sources
- Humour: Chickenz
The best that poultry has to offer
- Recent research: Wikipedia articles vs. concepts; Wikipedia usage in Europe
Plus the latest research publications.
- Technology report: Flow restarted; Wikidata connection notifications
Plus more tech news, and the latest scripts and bots
- Gallery: Chicken mania
Complimenting this issue's Humour about chickens...
- Special report: Two steps forward, one step backward: The Sustainability Initiative
Finally we're seeing some initial successes, but the Wikimedia movement is still far from being environmentally sustainable.
- Traffic report: Fights and frights
Boxing, hurricanes, clowns, and more!
- Featured content: Flying high
Newly featured birds, planes, and high achievers
Good Topic
Hi, I wanted to ask you something. If I were to bring Sonic Adventure, Sonic Heroes, Sonic Colors (currently at GAN), and Sonic Generations to Good Articles, would that allow me to make a Good Topic about Generations? (it would include those games, Sonics 1, 2, Knuckles, Adventure 2, 06, and Unleashed) ~ TheJoebro64 (talk) 22:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely positive that would work. Not sure if it would pass nomination. Might have to ask at topic questions for more input. GamerPro64 05:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Precious three years!
| Three years! |
|---|
The Signpost: 23 October 2017
- News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!
The Wikimedia Foundation publishes the latest fundraising report, convenes over the close of the strategic plan discussion, and moves into a new space.
- Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables
A variety of topics promoted.
- Humour: Guys named Ralph
If your name is Ralph, well sorry.
- In focus: Offline Wikipedia developed at OFF.NETWORK Content Hackathon
Advocates for sharing offline information gather to make content, software, hardware, and social decisions.
- Blog: The future of offline access to Wikipedia: The Kiwix example
A chat with a developer of open source software which allows users to download web content for offline reading, and the future of offline access to Wikipedia.
- In the media: Facebook and poetry
Fighting fake news and plagiarism.
- Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK
Wikimedia UK's partnerships and achievements working with GLAM institutions.
- Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment
Readers interested in the the death of Hef, Puerto Rico, films and television.
Meteos copyedit
| Hello, GamerPro64. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Meteos at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Miniapolis 18:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 24 November 2017
- News and notes: Cons, cons, cons
The first ever Wikidata conference was a con we wanted. Problematic paid editing while in a position of trust: not so much.
- Arbitration report: Administrator desysoped; How to deal with crosswiki issues; Mister Wiki case likely
Arbitration matters from October and November.
- Technology report: Searching and surveying
A new advanced search interface; the Community Wishlist Survey is back.
- Interview: A featured article centurion
Brianboulton talks about featured articles on his 100th promotion.
- WikiProject report: Recommendations for WikiProjects
A novel approach to recruit members for your project!
- In the media: Open knowledge platform as a media institution
Wikipedia seen as flawed but important; conservative think-tank fellow wants his say; volunteer in Madison wants to close the gender gap.
- Traffic report: Strange and inappropriate
Readers intrigued by the Netflix show Stranger Things, and by sexual assault allegations.
- Featured content: We will remember them
War memorials, soldiers, extinct species, and devastating hurricanes are some of the most recently promoted featured content.
- Recent research: Who wrote this? New dataset on the provenance of Wikipedia text
And other new research publications.
- Humour: Good faith (but still incomprehensible)
The entertainment value of Wikipedia.
Re:Copyedit request
Hey Gamer! It's been a while. I wish I could help, but, unfortunately, work keeps me too busy these days for that kind of focused, time-consuming job to be an option now. My Wikipedia editing is limited mostly to scatterbrained drive-by stuff, half-finished article revisions and things like that. Sorry! I'd recommend another copyeditor in my place, but I've been out of the loop so long I'm not sure who's who anymore. Best of luck with the FAC, regardless—Meteos is a game I've always found interesting. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, GamerPro64. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Meteos
| Hello, GamerPro64. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Meteos at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)) |
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
Global article creation contest/editathon exceeds expectations.
- Blog: Close encounters of the Wikipedia kind
Astronaut is first to specifically contribute to Wikipedia from space.
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
Seventeen articles, twenty-nine lists, three pictures and one featured topic were promoted.
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
The media discuss online copyright issues, Wikipedia's coverage of the capital of Israel and creation of a "reasonably clean, honest and reliable" work on Earth and in space.
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
Evidence phase in Mister Wiki editors case is complete; the community is proposing remedies and the Arbitration committee is slated to make a decision by end of year. Meanwhile, voting has closed on 2017 elections.
- Gallery: Wiki loving
Winners of the international photo competitions Wiki Loves Earth and Wiki Loves Monuments.
- Interview: Interview with Charlesjsharp, regular contributor of Wikipedia's Featured Pictures
Looking back on a decade of contributions including over 1,000 images and over three dozen Featured Pictures, Charles shares his wildlife photography experience and tips.
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
And other recent research publications.
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
Including improved blocking tools, new user scripts, and the latest technical news.
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys
We like our heroes and bad guys.
- Humour: On their way to the WMF Incubator
u-nye-loo-lay-doo?Dochvetlh vISoplaHbe’.
And olive branch & holiday wishes!
I've caused this year to end on a chord of disappointment for many, but I hope that despite my mistakes and the differences in opinion and perspectives, and regardless of what the outcome is or in what capacity I can still contribute in the coming year, we can continue working together directly or indirectly on this encyclopedic project, whose ideals are surely carried by both of our hearts. I'm hoping I have not fallen in your esteem to the level where "no hard feelings" can no longer ring true, because I highly respect you and your dedication to Wikipedia, and I sincerely wish you and your loved ones all the best for 2018.
|
FE GTC notification template
Quick question - what's the reason you removed the GTC notification in this edit? I was just following the GTC nom instructions which said to leave that on the talk page, and the nomination isn't finished yet... if anything, I'd think the complaint would be not adding it to all the subpages being added (which I didn't think would be necessary). SnowFire (talk) 23:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I honestly thought that it was for another nomination. I confused it with something else. Though it didn't need its own section in the talk page. It could have just been placed on top of the page. Sorry about that. GamerPro64 23:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, line 7 doesn't really say of the GTCadd instructions ("Add the template {{FTCaddmain|ExampleTopicName|1}} or {{GTCaddmain|ExampleTopicName|1}} (as appropriate) to the talk page of the main article in the series, and {{FTCadd|ExampleTopicName|1}} or {{GTCadd|ExampleTopicName|1}} (again, as appropriate) to the talk page of each new member article. Replace the number 1 with the actual addition number. This lets the editors of those articles know about the nomination."). I personally think a new section is better; isn't everybody trained to totally ignore the template spam at the top of every talk page? ;-) SnowFire (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- The template eventually has to be removed after a GTC so it would be pointless to create a section for the template as the section would have to be deleted itself. That's how I see it. GamerPro64 23:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, line 7 doesn't really say of the GTCadd instructions ("Add the template {{FTCaddmain|ExampleTopicName|1}} or {{GTCaddmain|ExampleTopicName|1}} (as appropriate) to the talk page of the main article in the series, and {{FTCadd|ExampleTopicName|1}} or {{GTCadd|ExampleTopicName|1}} (again, as appropriate) to the talk page of each new member article. Replace the number 1 with the actual addition number. This lets the editors of those articles know about the nomination."). I personally think a new section is better; isn't everybody trained to totally ignore the template spam at the top of every talk page? ;-) SnowFire (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
What am I doing?
I have no clue what to do here on Wikipedia for 2018. No ideas for article work and the like. Can't figure out what else to do here, really. I feel burnt out on anything do to. If anyone has a suggestion feel free to drop one. GamerPro64 02:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- How about Mega Man 7? I know this is kinda random but I came across it today and the article's looking good; just needs a better reception section and some citations. JOEBRO64 02:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- I did have a thought about Mega Man 7 the other day. I might look at the article again tomorrow. GamerPro64 03:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- How about picking up The Signpost again? We're so desperate to get more writers, anything you add would be greatly appreciated. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
- News and notes: Communication is key
Two new WMF Communications department leadership appointments; a new way for Wikimedia communities to communicate their capacities.
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
Wikipedia manipulated and copied – again
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
Historical and pop culture articles promoted.
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
How do you make an average of 3,600 edits a week for over a decade? And what do you learn when you've done it?
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
Plus the latest technology upgrades, tools and news.
- Humour: Why don't we have an article about _________?
Notable missing articles.
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
In deciding to de-sysop an admin for efforts to evade discussion and review of paid edits made on behalf of a PR firm, Arbitration Committee doesn't significantly change the rules around paid editing, and leaves it up to the community whether to apply special restrictions to administrators.
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
A look back at the most popular articles in a tumultuous and intriguing year.
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
- Op-ed: Do editors have the right to be forgotten?
Should an editor's block history be a permanent "rap sheet", or does Wikipedia forgive and forget? A reform initiative has begun.
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
Exemplary content recognized between January 12 and January 20, 2018
- Recent research: Automated Q&A from Wikipedia articles; Who succeeds in talk page discussions?
Also: Polish quality, Russian political mythologization, and multilingual analyses
- Blog: New monthly dataset shows where people fall into Wikipedia rabbit holes
The Wikimedia Foundation's Analytics team compiles a clickstream dataset, now available as a series of monthly data dumps for English, Russian, German, Spanish, and Japanese Wikipedias.
- Interview: Interview with The Rambling Man, Wikipedia's top contributor of Featured Lists
Lessons on Creating a Featured List
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
The most popular articles for January 14 to 27
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
A partnership to improve and update Wikipedia's medical content
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
Politeness and collegial behavior about to be taken up by Arbcom, and perhaps a revisit of the infobox question.
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
Also, did UCF really win?
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Enjoy the humour of another contributor
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
Sweden selected for Wikimania 2019; research report on shaping the future; a scarcity of RfAs.
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
There might be good things about an edit war.
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
Editor in self-imposed exile and infobox wars a thorn in the side of arbitration committee.
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
The Superbowl, the Winter Olympics, death, and accusations of unspeakable things.
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
An eclectic mix of promotions.
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
And other recent tech news.
- Humour: Impossible and unexplained traffic report
Stubs get a lot of pageviews.
Barnstar
| The Special Barnstar | ||
| I wanted to thank you for this note you put on my talk page back in 2014 here: . Editing Wikipedia can feel so anonymous, and if you hadn't dropped that line, I probably wouldn't have kept coming back, especially after I've seen all the people that I used to know around here fall by the wayside. It meant the world to me and I'm here today to say thank you because you reached out-- thanks for all the work that you do here and keep it up! Nomader (talk) 02:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC) |
- Thank you for the barnstar, Nomander. I usually like to keep an eye on other editors, especially ones that always do a great job here on Wikipedia. GamerPro64 03:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Request for copyedit
I noticed you are listed as backup for The Signpost's Arbitration Report. Could you possibly do a copyedit on next issue's edition so that we can declare the section ready for publication? Thx ☆ Bri (talk) 03:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- Op-ed: Death knell for The Signpost?
Is The Signpost on its last legs?
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
Wikimedia events, group recognition, and individual appointments are ongoing.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
Arbcom considers new discretionary sanctions for infoboxes and an extension of 1RR.
- In the media: The media on Wikipedia's workings: the good and not-so-good
Diplomats join Wikipedia for International Women's Day, the perfect "Human", how fringe theories are sustained, and perennial plagiarism from our pages.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
Wakanda still fascinates; the Oscars happened; Winter Olympics come to a close; and International Women's Day gets over a million page views.
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
A plethora of content.
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
Reviewing a browser skin providing equal emphasis on both content and editing tools simultaneously.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
Retrospective on article creation trial.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
Nostalgia and trips down Memory Lane.
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
Following Kudpung's op-ed "Death knell sounding for The Signpost?" in the 29 March issue, user comments encouraged a burst of enthusiasm to keep the newspaper in print.
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
How to revive and evolve The Signpost? Big blue-sky proposals and small concrete proposals from the community and from two regular Signpost contributors.
- News and notes: Photo of Kim Jong-un. Stephen Hawking death tops hits on many Wikipedias.
Finally a free image Kim Jong-un. WMF wins legal battle. Stephen Hawking death tops all Wikipedia hits.
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
Internet companies use Wikipedia to police truth; Citogenesis proven yet again; early birthday greetings; and trains
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
A recent Community Health Initiative survey found only 27% of respondents are happy with the way reports of conflicts between Editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (ANI).
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
New major editing policy starting immediately: creation of articles in mainspace is to be limited to users with confirmed accounts
- Opinion: Guideline for Organization Notability revised
The standards have been raised for sources used in judging the notability of nonprofit and for-profit organizations.
- Op-ed: World War II Myth-making and Wikipedia
Wikipedia's myth of the clean Wehrmacht and what you can do about it. Or, how not to be one of "the worst distributors of pro-Nazi perspectives and the Wehrmacht myth".
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
Can Wikipedia mobilize the same energy to fill other gaps in coverage?
- Discussion report: The future of portals
What should we do about Portals? Keep them, delete them, or mark them as historical? Or should they be more closely connected with their WikiProject(s)?
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
Quiet month for the Arbitration Committee
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
Combat, weapons, monuments and personalities.
- Blog: Why the world reads Wikipedia
What we learned about reader motivation from a recent research study
- Humour: Our Favorite Places to Whine About Stuff
You might not get all excersized about essays but they can be as fun as talk pages
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
The most popular articles from March 25 to April 14.
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
Plus the latest tech news and userscripts.
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Material promoted from March 2 through April 20.
- Gallery: A look at some famous and not as well-known border tripoints
Honoring a day in military history, as well as peaceful borders
Maniac Mansion scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that Maniac Mansion has been scheduled as today's featured article for 6 May 2018. Please check that the article needs no polishing or corrections. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 6, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, and Jimmy and the others who made what it is! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Some GA help?
Sorry for the intrusion, i was looking at the Meteos article and noticed you were the one who helped get it to GA-class. I'm working on Edge (video game) and Every Extend Extra (also trying to get it to be renamed to just Every Extend and encompass it as a series). I thought maybe I could get your help on these games to GA-class as well. IMHO, Edge (video game) is really close to becoming GA. Every Extend Extra still needs some expansion to B-class first before considering it for GA. I also have my eye on a few games such as Lumines, Space Channel 5 and Rez. Sorry if this is coming out of the blue. I wanted to ask in WP:VG but judging from the responses, it seems its better to ask for individual assistance rather than group collaboration.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 09:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Personally Meteos was one of my favorite games for the DS so that was a passion project. Not sure about doing another puzzle game. But I will give Edge a solid read through to see if it'll pass a GAN. GamerPro64 20:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- I thought that was the case. I jus thought that you also played all of the games i mentioned. If you have a chance, try Edge if its not too expense on smartphone. I wanted to focus on the other games because I'm a fan of Tetsuya Mizuguchi's work and wanted to work on his articles to see if i can get it up to a Good topic or Featured topic. Is Meteos the only game you played Tetsuya Mizuguchi worked on?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes it is. GamerPro64 22:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- If you like Meteos, i think you'll enjoy his other works too.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:58, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes it is. GamerPro64 22:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- I thought that was the case. I jus thought that you also played all of the games i mentioned. If you have a chance, try Edge if its not too expense on smartphone. I wanted to focus on the other games because I'm a fan of Tetsuya Mizuguchi's work and wanted to work on his articles to see if i can get it up to a Good topic or Featured topic. Is Meteos the only game you played Tetsuya Mizuguchi worked on?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
A busy office with minimal staff.
- Op-ed: Has the wind gone out of the AdminShip's sails?
Kudpung has some thoughts on the reasons for becalmed forums and the reluctance of candidates to (wo)man the rigging.
- Opinion: Integrating my many lives on Wikipedia
Thoughts on how looking for the truth on Wikipedia brings out unexpected things in the real world.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
After a recent Village Pump discussion, the Signpost looks at WikiProject Portals.
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
A busy month for discussions on major topics.
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Science, sportspeople, video games, and history feature heavily in the community's picks this month.
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
Has an attempt to prevent historical revisionism become a content battleground?
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
De-recognition of Brazil user groups; brute-force attack on Wikipedia; Wikimedia Conference 2018; and assorted other silly things.
- In the media: Wikipedia in Turkish politics; COI politics in Wikipedia; most cited work
And the burning question of the day, is the monkey selfie going to space with the rest of Wikipedia?
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
No surprises here as the summer movie season begins.
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
Improved mobile app, searching, citations, inline maps, voting, and more.
- Blog: Why I write about women on Wikipedia
Editor SusunW delves into reasons why she has created hundreds of articles about women.
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
Too many women still don't know that Wikipedia is editable.
- Humour: Play with your food
Down the rabbit hole into the realm of third-grade mind.
- Gallery: Wine not?
May 25 is National Wine Day in the United States.
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
The dark and twisted world of Wikipedia's most powerful media institution: The Signpost.
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
A busy office with minimal staff.
- Op-ed: Has the wind gone out of the AdminShip's sails?
Kudpung has some thoughts on the reasons for becalmed forums and the reluctance of candidates to (wo)man the rigging.
- Opinion: Integrating my many lives on Wikipedia
Thoughts on how looking for the truth on Wikipedia brings out unexpected things in the real world.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
After a recent Village Pump discussion, the Signpost looks at WikiProject Portals.
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
A busy month for discussions on major topics.
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Science, sportspeople, video games, and history feature heavily in the community's picks this month.
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
Has an attempt to prevent historical revisionism become a content battleground?
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
De-recognition of Brazil user groups; brute-force attack on Wikipedia; Wikimedia Conference 2018; and assorted other silly things.
- In the media: Wikipedia in Turkish politics; COI politics in Wikipedia; most cited work
And the burning question of the day, is the monkey selfie going to space with the rest of Wikipedia?
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
No surprises here as the summer movie season begins.
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
Improved mobile app, searching, citations, inline maps, voting, and more.
- Blog: Why I write about women on Wikipedia
Editor SusunW delves into reasons why she has created hundreds of articles about women.
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
Too many women still don't know that Wikipedia is editable.
- Humour: Play with your food
Down the rabbit hole into the realm of third-grade mind.
- Gallery: Wine not?
May 25 is National Wine Day in the United States.
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
The dark and twisted world of Wikipedia's most powerful media institution: The Signpost.
Question about Template:WPVG announcements
Hi, are merge discussions added to this template under "current discussions"? I was going to add this but I wanted to make sure that's what the section is used for. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- I think so. GamerPro64 12:38, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- From the editor: The Admin Ship is still barely afloat, while a Foundation project risks sinking
A Wiki not so Simple, a mayor motivating an editathon, a Marshall Plan, and a Wikimania under a cloud of criticism
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
Further developments on New Page Review and Articles for Creation work sharing
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
Admins volunteer to be abused – or so it seems
- Opinion: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes
So it shouldn't get credit for our work, either.
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
Major grants announced, a new milestone for Afrikaans Wikipedia, a new WMF technical engagement team, an effort to start up a new library, two new admins – or maybe three fewer depending on your math.
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
Several online battles are juxtaposed with stories about cooperation and good deeds, Arbcom hovering over it all; notwithstanding, a good action movie script is not necessarily found here.
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
Community discussions include style updates to project-wide icons and the main page, procedural questions on royal names and jettisoning unsuitable drafts, and deeper questions of compliance with European privacy laws and the perennial issue of shrinking admin corps.
- Featured content: New promotions
Enjoy the superb content
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
British politics case enters workshop phase and German war effort closes workshop, goes to Arbcom for proposals.
- Traffic report: Endgame
Two celebrities hang themselves, and the FIFA World Cup is underway
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
An AI assistant comes to watchlists; better mobile compatibility; new bots, tools and scripts; and more
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
Colorful and moving.
- Blog: Wikipedia should be open for editors in Turkey
WMF appeals to Turkish Minister of Transport, Maritime, and Communications Ahmet Arslan to lift the block of all language versions of Wikipedia for over a year.
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
Studying ourselves: 'driven by a sense of mission' according to researchers.
- Humour: Television plot lines
In our next episode...
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
Some essays are funny, some are serious; some are just, well what exactly?
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Revisiting an editor's warning to count our kidneys and keep the wolves at bay
Happy First Edit Day

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Is this loss?
Consider moving your approved nomination to Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know. - hahnchen 15:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- The hook itself would have to be approved first. But I can get behind it being used for April Fools. GamerPro64 16:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
Ships and shoes – and if you don't like it here, just go away!
- Op-ed: The last leg of the Admin Ship's current cruise
How admin would-bes run the gauntlet.
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
Wikipedia referees wag a finger at Professional Wrestling editors.
- News and notes: Another newspaper for Wikipedia; Wikimania 2018 ends; changes at NPR
New admins and Kudpung finally leaves NPP after 7 years.
- In the media: Blackouts in Europe; Wikipedia and capitalists; WMF Jet Set
One secret cabal that watches out for conspiracy theories, and another one out to stymie venture capitalists?
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
And more: a new user group for editing code, Women in Red, and arbitrator articles.
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
Spanning the gamut from warfare and destruction to pop culture to celebrations of nature and humanity's achievements.
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
We don't have "state agents" in a political debate, but couldn't talk about it if there were.
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
Finding the mathematician and Supreme Court nominee in this list is like playing Where's Waldo?.
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
Useful new gadgets.
- Gallery: Independence days, national holidays, and football – all in July
Depictions of July events in several countries.
- Blog: Motivation of two editors
Those who study ancient Egypt.
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
And other recent findings, plus a roundup of research presentations at Wikimania.
- Humour: It's all the same
Merge WikiProject Professional wrestling and ANI.
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
Get over it!
- From the archives: The pending changes fiasco: how an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Collaborating on Suikoden II
Hello, I'm reaching out to see if you would be be willing to collaborate with me on improving the article for Suikoden II. I've got a handful of proposed edits and citations drafted on the game's talk page. It would be awesome if you could help with the edits. TrueNeutral14 (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Loss (Ctrl+Alt+Del)
Hello! Your submission of Loss (Ctrl+Alt+Del) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Good Topic Dhammakaya Movement
Dear GamerPro64, would you mind taking a look at this good topic nomination, and see if it can be promoted? Thanks.
--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 07:43, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Phantasmagoria (video game) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that I've scheduled Phantasmagoria (video game) to appear on the main page as today's featured article on August 24, 2018. If you need to make tweaks to the blurb, it is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 24, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, and Hunter Kahn, for the article, introduced: "Made by one of the most important women video game designers Roberta Williams, this horror game was a far cry from the type of games Sierra On-Line made back in the day, such as Space Quest and Police Quest. Still the history behind the creation of this game, along with the controversy and banning from Australia once it was released, a fascinating look at gaming back in 1995"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Loss (comic)
On 28 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Loss (comic), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on its tenth anniversary, the webcomic "Loss" was replaced by an edited version titled "Found"? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Loss (comic)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
Keep straight on – there are trolls in the hedgerows.
- Interview: 2018 Wikimedian of the Year, Farkhad Fatkullin
"Imagine a world in which every single human being is a Wikimedian. That's my commitment!"
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
WMF pays possible Orangemoody ring for user research, and ditches MediaWiki for publishing its own blog. Knife-edge closures at RfA.
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
But unfortunately its output is incompatible with open licensing.
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
Plus: Simple English Wikipedia stays open, a discussion on draft header templates, bias blind spot by admins offered cash?
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Astronauts named Armstrong, babes of the Brits, Cortinarius caperatus and all that.
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
"Bridging knowledge gaps, the ubuntu way forward".
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
Very high and very low hits; love and loss.
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
Citation bot and mapframe enhancements; new licenses for Data space; possible hiccup on 12 September; per-user page, namespace, and upload blocking; and miscellaneous new bots and tools.
- Gallery: Leapfrog, historic Thai cave, and a rhythmic beat
Some of the best pictures of 2017.
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
Readers prefer the AI's version 40% of the time – but it still suffers from hallucinations.
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
Nothing funny about it.
- Essay: Principle of Some Astonishment
Remind you of any Wikipedia articles?
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
The Wikipedia Plays.
Soultaker (film)
| Hello, GamerPro64. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Soultaker (film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 01:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)) |
