Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
Hi FairlyFlatFoot! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:20, Wednesday, November 28, 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reade Baker has been accepted

edit
Reade Baker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 19:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

edit
  • News and notes: Some wishes do come true
    NPP wins the wish list poll; Wikipedia editors will be able to work better at night; new WMF appointments and new arbitrators; and who wants to be an admin?
  • In the media: Political hijinks
    Wikipedia says 'ta' to British M.P. and 'buh-bye' to U.S. President's image vandals.
  • Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
    Plus: reliable sources, notability, and fallout from the self-blocking software changes.
  • WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
    Discovering how new and unregistered users make articles with the members of WikiProject Articles for Creation.
  • Blog: News from the WMF
    In and around the WMF and its projects from the WMF's web site.
  • Essay: Requests for medication
    When the desire to continue to have the privilege of editing Wikipedia overrides the body's innate desire to choke the living shit out of some bastard who really has it coming.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald H. Graves (January 3)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JC7V7DC5768 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources aren't independent enough and some are in passing or coat racking (ie more about his work than him). Fix these issues.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JC7V (talk) 19:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, FairlyFlatFoot! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JC7V (talk) 19:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald H. Graves has been accepted

edit
Donald H. Graves, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Thsmi002 (talk) 19:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

edit
  • Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
    Emergency server switch goes smoothly; technical glitches resolved; a new way to transfer files to Commons.
  • News from the WMF: News from WMF
    The world’s largest photo contest, a $1 million gift, Wikipedia’s birthday, WF appoints Valerie D'Costa.
  • Essay: How
    A narrative to get you oriented to how this place works, and to the key policies and guidelines.

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

edit
  • From the editors: Help wanted (still)
    This may be too wordy, verbose and loquacious – and possibly redundant – but as you know, it takes others to check our work, and if there were more people in the Newsroom, we'd be able to double check ourselves and produce a better product for our readership; if you think you are up to it, you are welcome to join us and even copyedit the Editor-in-Chief's article intros.
  • Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
    This month's major discussions include a WMF talk page consultation and a proposed current events noticeboard.
  • Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
    Horsemen of the apocalypse all represented in recently promoted content, alongside new life, pretty birds, great music, and other miscellaneous topics.
  • Traffic report: Binge-watching
    Netflix shows and TV sports dominate. A US politician breaks into the top 10.
  • Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
    Tool labs goes kaput, bots running wild (not really), interface administrators step into the breach, new gadgets and other tech happenings.
  • Gallery: Signed with pride
    A gallery of user signatures created by Wikipedians themselves.

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

edit
  • News and notes: An Action Packed April
    New Administrators, April Fools, our competitors, and other associated updates

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

edit
  • From the editors: Picture that
    The North Face sneaks in advertisements, apologizes after being caught
  • Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
    Resignations, new cases, administrator security, and more
  • Technology report: Lots of Bots
    Admin bots, approved bots, bots on trial, lots and lots of bots
  • Essay: Paid editing
    We've been talking about paid editing forever

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrianne Haslet (June 12)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No mention of any award?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Georgy Gabrichevsky

edit


Hello, FairlyFlatFoot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Georgy Gabrichevsky.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —JJMC89(T·C) 05:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

edit
  • Technology report: Actors and Bots
    Database changes, new scripts, Tech News, and more.
  • Gallery: Unlike the North Face, Wiki Loves Earth
    Wikimedia photographers surge to contribute to the Wiki Loves Earth campaign even while rogue clothing company The North Face replaces wiki illustrations with advertisements.

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

edit

Edit-warring on Douglas Murray

edit
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editingespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringeven if you don't violate the three-revert ruleshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Snooganssnoogans: Kindly explain to me why I am being called out for edit warring when you are just as guilty as I am. I went to the Talk page before you did, and you reverted my edits first. As a matter of fact, you've reverted three times and I only reverted twice. I would like to call in other editors to decide the issue of whether it is OK to use statements from The Spectator as sources for Murray's statements. And a decision on this idea in general, because it seems to me you are reading the Wiki guidelines incorrectly, and calling me out for edit warring also seems overly harsh, like biting the newbies. FairlyFlatFoot (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo

Hi FairlyFlatFoot! You created a thread called Using self-published sources at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


The Signpost: 30 September 2019

edit
  • Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
    Summary of actions around a formerly banned former administrator: Arbitration Committee action and withdrawn request for adminship

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

edit
  • Arbitration report: October actions
    An "unblockable" is blocked; a former arb resigns.

Draft:Adrianne Haslet concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adrianne Haslet, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrianne Haslet (November 13)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GeneralPoxter (talk) 15:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

edit
  • Essay: Adminitis
    Some humor about the otherwise serious subject of burnout.

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

edit
  • Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
    Regarding integrity of information presented by Wikipedia, as well as the processes and people who ensure it remains trustworthy.

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

edit

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

edit

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

edit
  • Arbitration report: Unfinished business
    A new case, a case returns from limbo, and an RfC being prepared.

Draft:Adrianne Haslet concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adrianne Haslet, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

edit

Your draft article, Draft:Adrianne Haslet

edit

Hello, FairlyFlatFoot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adrianne Haslet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 18:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

edit

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

edit

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

edit

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

edit
  • Featured content: Life finds a Way
    Animals, sports, military, and science feature heavily in this month's best content.

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

edit
  • Featured content: Life finds a Way
    Animals, sports, military, and science feature heavily in this month's best content.

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

edit

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

edit
  • Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
    Wikipedia deprecates more right-wing sources than left-wing sources ... but is it a problem?

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

edit
  • Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
    Punks and heroes, losers and winners, the bereaved and the deceased – they're all here.

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

edit

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

edit

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

edit
  • Obituary: Yoninah
    Barukh dayan ha-emet ("Blessed is the true judge.")

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

edit

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

edit

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

edit
  • Obituary: SarahSV
    Requiescat in pace.

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

edit

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

edit

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

edit

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

edit
  • WikiProject report: Redirection
    An interview with participants at WikiProject Redirect.

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

edit
  • WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
    15th annual event closes with hundreds of articles improved
  • From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
    Wikipedia democratizes knowledge, but is it in Jeopardy?
  • Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
    We should have at least one of these every year!

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

edit
  • From the editor: Here is the news
    And wishing our readers a healthy, fortunate and bountiful 2022.
  • Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
    Elections certified, bans unlifted, mailing lists restricted, but no new cases.
  • Humour: Buying Wikipedia
    Helpful how-to for the prospective buyer. Why settle for a measly single edit, when you can buy the whole thing?

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

edit
  • WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
    Interview with volunteers at the Unreviewed featured articles 2020 working group.

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

edit
  • WikiProject report: 10 years of tea
    Coffee in Teahouse and other secrets revealed in this interview with volunteers.

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

edit
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
    Reporting from on the ground in Ukraine.
  • From the archives: Burn, baby burn
    A look at when early backups of Wikipedia were recovered.

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

edit
  • News and notes: Double trouble
    The second case of Wikipedian persecution.
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)
    "Our proud Sparta bleeds too."
  • Interview: On a war and a map
    How a war map predated Wikimedia's map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

edit
  • Featured content: Featured content of April
    Showcasing the very best articles, pictures, videos, and other contributions from Wikipedians last month.
  • From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
    A look at when The Onion published an humorous article regarding Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

edit

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

edit
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (part 3)
    "This year's victory was sad and dull."
  • Opinion: Criminals among us
    Mass murderers, sex criminals, Ponzi schemers, insider traders, and business people.
  • Gallery: A backstage pass
    All the things about theatre that the general public misses out on.

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

edit
  • Discussion report: Boarding the Trustees
    2022 elections, new page patrol, Fox News, Vector 2022, Royal Central and external links
  • From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago
    The Signpost looks back on The Signpost: New reports, conceived in a spirit of collaboration, and dedicated to the proposition of information and, uh, more information for all.

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

edit
  • Featured content: Farm-fresh content
    This month: A FACBot upgrade, a completed list of lists.

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

edit

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

edit
  • Disinformation report: Missed and Dissed
    Are government goons prowling our fair encyclopedia?
  • Book review: Writing the Revolution
    Heather Ford's new volume on Wikipedia, knowledge and power in the 2011 Egyptian revolution.
  • Technology report: Galactic dreams, encyclopedic reality
    Facebook's Galactica demo provides a case study in large language models for text generation at scale: this one was silly, but we cannot ignore them forever.
  • Obituary: A tribute to Michael Gäbler
    They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old: Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
  • CommonsComix: Joker's trick
    A toast to good health, a health to good hoax, a hoax to good toast.

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
    You head into the featured content report. Amongst the features you see astronauts, both Gilbert and Sullivan, Ursula K. Le Guin's incredibly talented mother, and Billboard charts. It is pitch black, you are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  • From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
    Photographers, Sandy Hook, the shocking use of Nazi symbols in articles about Nazis, and "You wouldn't recognise a fact if it bit you in the ass".

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Flip your lid
    ...and your ambigram. Also: Boring lava fields, birds of Tuvalu, and commelinid family names with etymologies.

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Eden, lost.
    But much else to be found.

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

edit

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

edit
  • Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
    In this article, we will look at The Signpost statistics. More precisely: Signpost article statistics by year, TOP 20 titles of Signpost articles, TOP 20 article authors, and the home wikis of article authors.
  • News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
    First of a two part series summarising the priorities for the Wikimedia Foundation's next fiscal year (July 2022–June 2023) including staffing, budget and other changes, and how to provide your feedback.
  • Humour: The law of hats
    The Selfish Hatnote, the Disambiguation Singularity, and other information-theoretic conundra of encyclopedic note.

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

edit
  • Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
    Celebs and Bollywood film dominated reader interest, as usual, but with a new persistent presence on the lists of a certain AI.

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Poetry under pressure
    Now is not this ridiculous, and is not this preposterous? A thorough-paced absurdity - explain it if you can.

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

edit

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Incensed
    In which featured pictures have a pleasing orange/blue colour scheme for some reason.

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

edit
  • Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
    The innards of the Signpost received a major overhaul in March/April 2019. Here's how we reduced behind-the-scenes busywork and improved writers resources.

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

edit
  • In the media: Taking it sleazy
    "Poli", which means "many", and "tics", which means "under-the-table Wikipedia article whitewashing campaigns".

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Catching up
    Covering all of August. Pretty much.

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

edit
  • Featured content: By your logic,
    The first issue to feature two poetry article

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

edit

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

edit
  • Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
    Plus Kollywood, Killers of the Flower Moon, and ongoing war.

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

edit

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

edit
  • Comix: Bold comics for a new age
    "I think we ought to read only the kind of comics that wound or stab us. If the comic we're reading doesn't wake us up with a blow to the head, what are we reading for?" — Franz Kafka
  • Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
    This page in a nutshell: Whether or not someone has denied unsavory allegations — though such a denial may not merit being given equal weight in an article — a worthless shitpost should still be included.

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

edit
  • In the media: Consider the humble fork
    Forky on forky on forky, plus a strange donation scheme and other interesting bits of news.
  • Technology report: Dark mode is coming
    No more must Wikipedia always be a lightbulb in the dark — except metaphorically of course.
  • Crossword: when the crossword is sus
    The Signpost Crossword is a 2018 online multiplayer social deduction game that takes place in space-themed settings where players are colorful, armless cartoon astronauts.
  • BJAODN: Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
    Edit summary: "Only need this page for about 30 minutes to demonstrate to a friend how easy it is to create a Wikipedia page. Then it will be deleted."

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

edit
  • News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
    Let the games begin! The 2024 WikiCup is off to a strong start. With copyright enforcement, AI training and freedom of expression, it's another typical week in the wiki-sphere!
  • WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
    What are the editorial processes behind covering some of the most politically polarizing and contentious topics on English Wikipedia?

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

edit
  • Opinion: Until it happens to you
    A stream of consciousness about plagiarism on Wikipedia from the perspective of a user who directly witnessed it.
  • Comix: We've all got to start somewhere
    Writing a good subheading for a one-sentence joke is basically like writing an entire second joke so I'm not going to do it.

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

edit

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

edit

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

edit

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

edit

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

edit

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

edit

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

edit
  • In the media: War and information in war and politics
    Advocacy organizations, a journalist, mycophobes, conservatives, leftists, photographers, and a disinformation task force imagine themselves in Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

edit
  • Obituary: JamesR
    Rest in peace.

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

edit
  • In focus: Twitter marks the spot
    Musk's Twitter acquisition and rebranding have caused long debates on Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

edit

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

edit
  • Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
    User Hawkeye7 opens up on his experience as a media representative following the Australian team at the latest Summer Paralympics in Paris.
  • News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
    More changes to RfA on the way in October, final results for the U4C elections revealed, and other news from the Wikimedia world.

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

edit
  • In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
    Perplexing persistence, pay to play, potential president's possible plagiarism, crossword crossover to culture, and a wish come true!
  • Book review: The Editors
    A novel about us, from the point of view of three of us.

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

edit

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

edit

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

edit
  • Op-ed: On the backrooms
    An editor's reflection on social capital and their changing relationship with Wikipedia culture. by Tamzin

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

edit

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

edit

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

edit
  • News and notes: Let's talk!
    The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
  • Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
    Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
  • Traffic report: A wild drive
    The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

edit
  • Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year
    From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
  • Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing
    User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

edit
  • From the editor: Hanami
    It's an ecstasy, my spring.
  • Obituary: Rest in peace
    Send not to know
    For whom the bell tolls,
    It tolls for thee.

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

edit

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

edit
  • Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
    Television dramas, televised sports, film, the Pope, and ... bioengineering at the top of the list?

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

edit

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

edit

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

edit
  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

edit

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

edit

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

edit

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

edit
  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

edit

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

edit
  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

The Signpost: 17 December 2025

edit