Ezlo Jeslan

Carti AI

Hi! Please stop disruptive editing on articles about Playboi Carti's speculated use of AI. You insist that it's a "hoax" but haven't provided any reliable source indicating such. Citing a tweet from Carti's friend is not enough. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 01:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

He was there at the session, which makes him a reliable source.

In addition, much of the evidence, such as the other alleged "AI references", have all been proven to be faked with no involvement from Carti's team whatsoever. It's not disruptive editing I'm doing, I'm helping to correct rampant disinformation. Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 01:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

You can not call it a "hoax" based on your own conclusions; a reliable source needs to call it a hoax. As I stated elsewhere, Carti's friend's Twitter is not a reliable source. Also, your claim that the alleged leaked demos "were later proven to be created by leakers with no involvement from Carti's team" is not supported by the source provided. Please stop edit warring. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 01:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Opium (record label), without citing a reliable source (which Apple music is not). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Lil Happy Lil Sad ^:): 02:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

How is Apple not a reliable source? It clearly shows that Nast’s new song was released via Opium.

Furthermore, YouTube data also shows it was distributed by Foundation Media, which distributed Ken and HXG’s first albums. Nast’s affiliation with ASAP Mob makes him trustworthy, and the fact that the song lists Opium as a label and was distributed by Foundation confirms it. Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 14:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: "Fly Me to the Moon" and Neon Genesis Evangelion (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Moritoriko was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Fly Me to the Moon. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of this information can be merged to the original article of this song or the article on the series soundtrack but there don't seem to be enough sources talking about this version of the song for it to get it's own article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:"Fly Me to the Moon" and Neon Genesis Evangelion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Moritoriko (talk) 03:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Ezlo Jeslan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Moritoriko (talk) 03:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WW3 (Kanye West song) has been accepted

WW3 (Kanye West song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 21:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Mō Dō Natte mo Ii ya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mō Dō Natte mo Ii ya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GoldRomean (talk) 18:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Recent edits to VShojo

I have warned you before about speculation and opinions in the VShojo article. Please avoid bias remarks and provide valid sources. Thank you. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

The reactions do not meet Wikipedia standards, see WP:REACTIONS. Unless they can hold-up on their own, their are just additional information that provide no value added to the article. This is the reason I removed them. It also does not help that they are backed by the social media posts and not an third-party source referencing them. Hope this helps explain the rational. --WashuOtaku (talk) 01:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

They are, the Siliconera citations are right there. Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 01:57, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Then you do not need the social media posts, that covers it. That said, I still disapprove of the reactions. --WashuOtaku (talk) 02:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Regarding the defunct date, I do not appreciate it when I give a good faith effort sharing my rational on why it should be left blank and simply being ignored. To avoid an edit war, I am backing down for now; but I still encourage you to share your editorial thoughts in the talk page. And please remember, we all have the same goal here. --WashuOtaku (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Be aware of the the three-revert rule. Instead of edit warring, discuss changes on the article's talk page. Do not revert any more edits at VShojo. Any further reverts will be brought up at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Grayfell (talk) 01:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ezlo_Jeslan reported by User:Grayfell (Result: ). Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 01:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

File:ITunes screenshot of Cuck leak.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ITunes screenshot of Cuck leak.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Xeroctic (talk) 19:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hello. I want to let you know that please be careful when adding information on articles. Your recent contributions were about the reported closure of Nelvana. The edits were reverted because the sources you cited to support the information are self-published sources. Self-published sources, such as social media, are considered original research, and therefore, they are not allowed since this is an encyclopedia. Since there is no official, verifiable source about the closure, the reported closure is just a rumor/rumour for right now. Aubreeprincess (talk) 04:16, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amane Kanata (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

This is a well-written article and the subject is notable. However, I am concerned about the sourcing. The article relies far too much on social media posts as sources. The article should rely as much as possible on secondary sources that are independent of the subject (not interviews) and maybe use primary sources just to fill in details. I also think the "Career" section contains too much trivia and needs to be shortened. Also please format your references correctly (do not use bare URLs, see template:cite web). If you resubmit and the article is accepted, please make sure to delete the existing redirect.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amane Kanata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:08, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Amane Kanata AfC

Hey, you’ve been doing a great job on this article, and I would love to be able to approve it, but……. So much of it is Original research using primary sources, rather than Encyclopedic using reliable secondary sources. Ideally you need to cut out anything that is sourced via Twitter and first person You Tube. This means that a lot of the more colourful parts of the article need to go - being too promotional in tone at any rate - any other editor that comes across it once approved is going to cut all those parts out anyway. If you could fix that stuff up, I’ll take another look in a few days. Otherwise, I might be tempted to take the pruning shears to it myself, just to get it down to the point where I could approve it, and then editing can fix any other problems once it’s up and live…

Also, if you’re looking for other stuff to do, we could always use editors over on WikiProject Japan, there is always loads of work to do fixing stuff up / expanding stubs / adding the project link to the talk pages of like Anime and Manga stuff which usually doesn’t tag the project.

Have fun out there, hope to be able to approve this soon 👍 Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:11, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I thought enough of it was cited from more encyclopedic sources that it was okay (eight out of over 60), and I based it off the format of other VTubers who have similar citation sources (such as Marine and Ironmouse), but I'll double check and see what else can be cited from elsewhere.

Any tips on what other sources should be avoided? Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 00:23, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. When I said “Encyclopedic” I meant more in terms of tone… Like, as written it kind of combines an essay using primary sources, with like a human interest piece / fan page listing her hobbies, her cheerful personality etc. If you cut out a lot of that human interest/fan type stuff, it actually helps with the references too, since that is a lot of the parts using primary sources.

As for sources, they need to be secondary sources, which means no Twitter, YouTube or other social media, and also no interviews. Articles written by someone else ABOUT her is 👍 Things she herself says are not. The sources need to be both independent and reliable too, so no blogs, no social media, nothing (like Wikipedia) that can be freely edited. Ideally they would be published media pieces in like magazines, newspapers, etc - including web versions. Sources like the Real sounds interview are ok, but only the first non-interview portion would count towards proving “notability” (Wikipedia:Notability ). The second interview part can be used to prove facts about the person though (birthdate, siblings, meniers disease etc). Speaking of the Meniers disease - because this article is about a loving person, everything that you say about them that might be even the littlest bit controversial (and a disease or condition would count for this) needs to be directly sourced, so THAT is where you would use the interview as a source, ideally right after the claim, rather than at the end of the longer section.

Anyway, sorry I’ve written too much, don’t want to make this all sound so heavy. Just see what yo can do, and we can go from there. Absurdum4242 (talk) 02:58, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

I have removed all the Twitter and YouTube links in the bio section and cited for Meniere's. Using my Steam Deck and don't remember my password, and I apologize for that. 2600:1700:65C0:2120:0:0:0:36 (talk) 08:43, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Sweet, thanks for getting back so quick 👍 I’ll take another look now…

OK, so, that looks really good, definitely moving in the right direction, but to give you some more idea what I was talking about vis a vis Encyclopedic tone…

your version -

Overview

Amane Kanata is one of the five original members of "holoForce", Hololive's fourth generation of Japanese streamers, alongside Tokoyami Towa, Tsunomaki Watame, Himemori Luna, and formerly Kiryu Coco, who graduated in 2021. Her official bio describes her as being cheerful around her close friends, but shy and quiet in large crowds, with the goal of performing at the Saitama Super Arena.2 Her model was designed by Oshioshio 3 and currently rigged by Nokoyama as of February 2025.4

In 2017,5, Amane was diagnosed with Ménière's disease, which left her completely deaf in one ear and prevented her from joining traditional idol groups.6 Having already been interested in VTubers, she would apply for Hololive's fourth generation and was accepted despite having a lack of confidence in her ability. She has cited Eri Kamei as an inspiration for her work as an idol, as well as Minato Aqua as an influence on her VTubing career.5 She has also cited Yui Aragaki as her "first love"7, and her reaction to Yui's marriage to Gen Hoshino would serve as inspiration for her song "Betsu Sekai".8

Amane is well known for her strong vocal performance, having held notes in online concerts for more than 20 seconds on multiple occasions.9 She is also known her work as a composer on her solo songs "Betsu Sekai" and "Jumanokudo", as well as the holoForce group song "Kiseki Knot"; she has also written the lyrics for her songs "Start Up", "Sekai de Ichiban no Idol", and "Fallen Wing", the latter of which was co-written by Toby Fox and Camellia.8 Outside of her music, she is further known for her grip strength of over 50kg, which exceeds that of the average adult male, and has led her to inadvertently destroy multiple objects on stream.10

Cleaner version

Overview

Amane Kanata is one of the five original members of "holoForce” - Hololive’s fourth generation of Japanese streamers (alongside Tokoyami Towa, Tsunomaki Watame, Himemori Luna, and formerly Kiryu Coco). She graduated (do you mean started streaming? Or graduated university? For Japanese idol / music / anime etc situations, “graduate” usually means “stop performing”, but you have her model being rigged in Feb 2025… is she finished, or?) in 2021. Her model was designed by Oshioshio3 and is currently rigged by Nokoyama as of February 2025.4

In 2017, Amane was diagnosed with Ménière's disease,5 which left her completely deaf in one ear and prevented her from joining traditional idol groups. Having already been interested in VTubers, she applied for Hololive's fourth generation and was accepted despite having a lack of confidence in her own ability.Needs line citation on this

Amane is well known for her strong vocal performance, having held notes in online concerts for more than 20 seconds on multiple occasions.Needs citation, or cut She is also known her work as a composer on her solo songs "Betsu Sekai" and "Jumanokudo", as well as the holoForce group song "Kiseki Knot"; she has also written the lyrics for her songs "Start Up", "Sekai de Ichiban no Idol", and "Fallen Wing", the latter of which was co-written by Toby Fox and Camellia.Needs a different citation, as the one used is an interview, and the claim is “she is known for”, so you need something directly saying that.

Ok, so, can you see what I cut and changed around and why? All factual based, because it’s an Encyclopedia not a fan / human interest article. Use one better source (number 5), for both claims, which eliminates the need to use the tweet for source number 6. And need direct secondary sources (not interviews), for the two parts I wrote need citations.

Hope this helps, you’re doing great 👍 Absurdum4242 (talk) 09:31, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Coco was the one who graduated, my bad. Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amane Kanata has been accepted

Amane Kanata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 15:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:"Fly Me to the Moon" and Neon Genesis Evangelion

Hello, Ezlo Jeslan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:"Fly Me to the Moon" and Neon Genesis Evangelion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Your technical move request

Hello Ezlo Jeslan, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 12:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Hello, I'm TonySt. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ruby Rosary, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tony 04:05, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

I have added the album's Apple Music pre-save as a citation. Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 04:07, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disasterpiece (album) (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NALBUM. Not even released, no charting, no reviews. There are also a lot of unreliable sources used in the draft which will need replaced prior to resubmission. See WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disasterpiece (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucy Bedroque (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucy Bedroque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:57, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Collapse of VShojo

Hello, Ezlo Jeslan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Collapse of VShojo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disasterpiece (album) (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScalarFactor was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still WP:TOOSOON. I would highly recommend waiting until a day or two after the release for reviews. High reliance on self-published sources as of now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disasterpiece (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ScalarFactor (talk) 22:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Phantomime (album) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Phantomime (album), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:00, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Phantomime (album) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Phantomime (album). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Collapse of VShojo

Hello, Ezlo Jeslan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Collapse of VShojo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 6 February 2026 (UTC)