Your submission at Articles for creation: The Drawing Board (A-F-R-O EP) (February 9)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:07, 9 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dwaynefelix! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:07, 9 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Drawing Board (A-F-R-O EP) (February 11)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikeycdiamond was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Nothing has changed since the last review.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Mikeycdiamond (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Drawing Board (A-F-R-O EP) (February 12)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:15, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crimson Fury (A-F-R-O EP) (February 12)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 60 East (rapper) (February 12)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nighfidelity was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Out of all the sources, only the HotNewHipHop reference can really contribute to his notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Nighfidelity (talk) 19:31, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Modest World (A-F-R-O EP) (March 2)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllWeKnowOfHeaven was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 04:19, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bad and the Ugly (Stu Bangas and A-F-R-O album) (April 3)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Lovelyfurball, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.
The RapReviews review is good, a couple more similar reviews from reliable sources would demonstrate notability

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

Lovelyfurball (talk) 13:12, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Bad and the Ugly (Chapter 2) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to The Bad and the Ugly (Chapter 2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. msk 19:45, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

At the Sideshow 2: Art House moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to At the Sideshow 2: Art House. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 16:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Dwaynefelix. Thank you for your work on Blood Rain (A-F-R-O EP). Another editor, Asukite, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Article looks good - Trackblasters review might have been written by an LLM

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Asukite}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ASUKITE 15:56, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Blood Rain (A-F-R-O EP) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Blood Rain (A-F-R-O EP). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ASUKITE 15:59, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that! I left the comment above then realized that if the trackblasters review was LLM generated, then the article might not have enough WP:SIGCOV to survive deletion. I tried some searches using the custom search engine over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources and was not able to find much on top of regular searching. More comprehensive human-written reviews might help ensure this is kept. ASUKITE 16:01, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bad and the Ugly (Chapter 2) (June 12)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.
Fails WP:NALBUM - Discogs, Apple Music, blogsites and music retail sites are not acceptable or reliable independent sources. The AllMusic reference confirms the album but does not provide any detailed reviews/coverage.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:The Bad and the Ugly (Chapter 2) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply