Welcome!

edit
Hello, JulioISalazarG! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 03:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrBorgI (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 187.189.145.69. I may have been blocked for editing so many times the same document, but it was because I was correcting the source.

Decline reason:

Confirmed p2p proxy. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy for more details. Yamla (talk) 18:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2023

edit

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Assembly theory, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, it was me who added the content that I deleted because it had mistakes in references. JulioISalazarG (talk) 03:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Assembly theory, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia house style

edit

Hi. A couple comments about this edit: first, Wikipedia articles generally do not use titles like "Dr." or "Prof."; see the Manual of Style. Second, it appears that you have duplicated some material that was present earlier in the article. The Hazen et al. paper is currently both reference 9 and reference 16, for example. XOR'easter (talk) 02:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Correct. Hazen et al. peer-reviewed paper is already referenced in the Background section of the Assembly theory article. JulioISalazarG is engaged in an edit war and is disruptively trying to reference this paper twice in this article. Guswen (talk) 10:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Assembly theory. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Guswen (talk) 10:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

December 2024

edit

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Information lifecycle management, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Douglas Santana (talkcontribs) 08:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. JulioISalazarG (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vehicle infrastructure integration. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense   00:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The edit is not disruptive. I'm not disputing anything there and was just correcting grammatical issues. Please, get sure of double checking before posting on my talk page. Thank you. JulioISalazarG (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion

edit

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Am (Ring!) (Notes) 09:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

JulioISalazarG, please stop making meaningless 1 byte edits. I assume that, for some reason, you are trying to get to extended confirmed status. But if you achieve this by gaming the system, this status will be removed until you have actually earned it by making meaningful edits. Liz Read! Talk! 01:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

New message to JulioISalazarG

edit

Two things about references:

  1. Per WP:LEADCITE, it's usually not necessary or particularly desirable to add inline references to the lead section of an article, which is meant to be a summary of the cited material in the article body itself.
  2. It's also usually unnecessary to add more citations for a single claim. It could be desirable to replace lower quality citations if your replacement makes all the same claims, but simply tacking more on by itself doesn't really help. Remsense   06:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Florida State–Miami football rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your message and kind feedback. JulioISalazarG (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, DrBorgI. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 03:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Algorithmic probability. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 03:57, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. MrOllie (talk) 04:00, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply