User talk:Daniel/Archive/110

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Zinnober9 in topic Assistance Request

Hey!

edit

Glad to have had your message on my talk page the other day, Daniel :) I hope you're doing well - always makes me happy to have an interaction with someone I knew 10 - 15 years ago on here. It's great you're still active! Acalamari 21:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Couple of old-timers still kicking around causing chaos, we are! Great to see you too. Daniel (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Flip your lid
    ...and your ambigram. Also: Boring lava fields, birds of Tuvalu, and commelinid family names with etymologies.

Maurice Novoa (Australianblackbelt's favourite topic)

edit

Hey Daniel. Looking for your input as you're familiar with the topic and users involved. It seems that Maurice Novoa's page (that you originally deleted off an AfD) has been recreated with 98% identical text to when it was deleted, using User:Australianblackbelt's uploaded phots and suddenly has multiple editors editing in it. Clearly the page should be deleted again as it's a recreation of a deleted page with no substantial changes, but I'm also wondering if there is any sockpuppetry, or at least meat, from Australianblackbelt going on here. I'm happy to delete it myself, but I wanted a second opinion on the events surrounding it. Canterbury Tail talk 12:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sigh...yes, agree on both fronts. I've nominated for CSD G4 to get another set of eyes on it, but agree there's some sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry going on here. Daniel (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I saw that and I’ve just deleted it. It was almost identical to the old version. I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t looking at it in a tainted manner. And yes I think there’s more going on here that needs looking into. Canterbury Tail talk 01:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
And the User: Agnez Mo fan just linked to the article from a load of Australianblackbelts favourite articles that someone wouldn’t just happen to stumble across. Seems pretty clear cut. Canterbury Tail talk 01:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorted. Checkusered and rendered as Probably, so they've been blocked. Canterbury Tail talk 14:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Fantastic, thanks for that - definitely showed similar behavioural patterns, especially the gratuiotous linking to the article. If it gets recreated once more I'll be salting it I think. Daniel (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

Ferrari Challenge

edit

I was ruminating about what would be the best way to close this, and ended up putting it on my watchlist just to see how it would be handled. Just wanted to let you know, I think you did exactly the right thing, and I hope some of this wisdom will be absorbed by my tiny brain. Thanks for all you do around here. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but I have to disagree. Obviously, I'm INVOLVED, but I don't see how it can be closed as anything other than keep. None of the delete/redirect !voters did much of anything to explain how the links posted by 5225C and Jovanmilic97 didn't meet GNG; Drmies attempted, but using phrases like The second, the Italian source, it's better (while also misrepresenting the scope of the article, which he later doubled down on when corrected by HumanBodyPiloter5) and The fourth, from Racer, that's OK doesn't come off to me as very dismissive of them.
It has nothing to do with wanting vindication of the article in the state it is in. But AfD is not cleanup and GNG is not concerned with whether the sources are present in the article, but whether they exist (please correct me if I'm wrong here). - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 02:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
GhostOfDanGurney, those sources are shit and you know it. A couple of websites, a few enthusiasts, and a shitload of little hobbyists' factoids, and there's your Wikipedia article. It's embarrassing--when some of us are trying to write quality content. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Lmao; you could have said all that in the discussion, you know? - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 02:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Drmies: With respect, it does not appear that you are familiar with motorsports articles and your evaluations of the outlets I (and others) presented seems completely divorced from how they are considered in reality. If multiple motorsports editors are telling you that this is coverage from outlets that are reliable and respected within the field, then you really ought to listen. 5225C (talk  contributions) 02:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
End of conversation here - go argue about it elsewhere. A lot of the conduct above is quite unbecoming. I'm not changing my close, if you have such a moral objection to it, deletion review is available to you. Daniel (talk) 02:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion review for Ferrari Challenge

edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ferrari Challenge. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 04:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

edit

I due evasi di Sing Sing

edit

Deletion review for I due evasi di Sing Sing

edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of I due evasi di Sing Sing. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. MY OH MY 21:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Eden, lost.
    But much else to be found.

Happy Birthday!

edit

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 9 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidi Ahmed N'Ulqadi

edit

Hi, Daniel! I think you closed this 2021 AfD perfectly accurately, but since that close, it's come to light that both the nominator User:RandomCanadian and the sole delete !voter User:No Great Shaker were socking. When I reassess the debate subtracting the users who we now know to have been in bad faith, I get to "no consensus" or even, arguably, "keep". In the circumstances would you be willing to consider restoring the article?—S Marshall T/C 09:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Stuart, hope you're well. The history is still preserved behind the redirect at Sidi Ahmed N'Ulqadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), happy for you to revert the redirect and restore the article given the issues with the nominator here. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ah, so it is. Thank you!—S Marshall T/C 11:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

edit
  • Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
    In this article, we will look at The Signpost statistics. More precisely: Signpost article statistics by year, TOP 20 titles of Signpost articles, TOP 20 article authors, and the home wikis of article authors.
  • News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
    First of a two part series summarising the priorities for the Wikimedia Foundation's next fiscal year (July 2022–June 2023) including staffing, budget and other changes, and how to provide your feedback.
  • Humour: The law of hats
    The Selfish Hatnote, the Disambiguation Singularity, and other information-theoretic conundra of encyclopedic note.

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 8 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

edit
  • Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
    Celebs and Bollywood film dominated reader interest, as usual, but with a new persistent presence on the lists of a certain AI.

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Poetry under pressure
    Now is not this ridiculous, and is not this preposterous? A thorough-paced absurdity - explain it if you can.

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 19 June 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

edit
  • Featured content: Incensed
    In which featured pictures have a pleasing orange/blue colour scheme for some reason.

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration



Assistance Request

edit

Hello, I've been addressing fostered content issues on Wikipedia over the past month and there are now only three remaining in usertalk space. One of these is on your User talk:Daniel/Archive/59. If you would be willing, would you replace the entire contents of the "Doczilla's RFA" section with the following code block (within the collapse) to correct the syntax issues (one fostered content error, a table tag issue, two obsolete tags, a missing end tag, and three stripped tags)? While I'd normally make a smaller change X to Y in this sort of situation, this particular section had layered issues and it is just easier to fix the whole thing in one go.

Thank you, and if you have any questions, let me know. Zinnober9 (talk) 23:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Zinnober9:, please feel free to make this change yourself (despite it being in "my" archive). Cheers, Daniel (talk) 04:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. The reason I was asking was more due to it being Full protected and my not being able to access it with my Extended Confirmed level access, rather than it being someone's archive, however. That said, WOSlinker took care of the fostered content error the other week, and all fostered content errors in User Talk space are now happily gone. I'd be happy to address the other errors on your talk page if given the access, but the main issue I was after the other week has been addressed. Zinnober9 (talk) 10:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply