Your submission at Articles for creation: 2018 Bayshore Boulevard crash (September 1)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2018 Bayshore Boulevard crash has been accepted

edit
2018 Bayshore Boulevard crash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GGOTCC 23:14, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for your hard work updating the demographics of so many US county articles. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:52, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 19:53, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Census citations

edit

Can your script be modified to not link directly to API URLs, which may be less permanent and verifiable than the normal tables? The repetition of "United States Census Bureau" in the website field is also unneeded. SounderBruce 21:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @SounderBruce, I appreciate the feedback. I will fix the duplicate "United States Census Bureau" right away. As for linking to Census QuickFacts tables instead API URLs, I considered this but I think the APIs may actually be more permanent (there are still live APIs in the same format from 2010 and 2000). Can you provide references to any policies or guidelines that support using Census QuickFacts tables over the API? CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 03:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

December 2025

edit

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Boulder County, Colorado, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:32, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, my bad. I've got a bot that is adding 2020 census data to various counties, but sometimes it makes mistakes - like the ref tag in Boulder County, Colorado. I always go through and personally verify the changes but sometimes I don't get to it right away. I'm currently working on a mechanism that will set aside important/larger counties so that I only run updates for them when I directly have hands on the keyboard to validate. CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 04:01, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Maybe something needs tweaking... four separate citation errors (missing /ref tag) at Oconee County, South Carolina. Fixed; just a heads-up. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

January 2026

edit

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Bee Cave, Texas when you modified the page, you introduced conversion errors. The {{convert}} template can be complex and I encourage you to read its documentation but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it and when conversion errors are present they will show up in red. It is strongly recommended that you always use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:56, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

edit

The census script is adding "&amp" in place of just the ampersand in links, which is causing errors. SounderBruce 18:19, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @SounderBruce, thanks for letting me know. I have been spot-checking the links and have not seen this issue. Can you provide an example? CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 18:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just cleaned up one set at Astoria, Oregon. SounderBruce 18:24, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Census data

edit

Why are you effectively adding duplicates of content that is already covered in articles? Most of these articles already have tables detailing the 2020 census data. Bneu2013 (talk) 18:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Many of them have tables on race for the 2020 census, but not on any of the other information. Can you please provide an example of an article where you believe there is duplicate data? CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I just realized not all of these already had race/ethnicity tables. I was referring to duplicate race/ethnicity tables, such as the one you added to Chattanooga, Tennessee. There's no need for two of these. Bneu2013 (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
My problem with this editor is that for Rockwall, Texas they have a 2020 population date based on a 2015 date. Doug Weller talk 10:23, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

You're continuing to add duplicate tables to cities that already have them. Why is this? Bneu2013 (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

They're not duplicates, one treats "hispanic" as an ethnicity that is independent of race, and another only counts "non-hispanic" for each other race and then essentially treats "hispanic" as a race in and of itself. Its a confusing distinction that I think they are getting rid of in future censuses, but they still had it in 2020.
I don't think it's incorrect to include one, the other, or both. Are you aware of any wikipedia guidelines about this topic? CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 00:33, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Not directly, but nearly all sources refer to Hispanic as an ethnicity along with other racial/ethnic groups, so it's best to use this formulation. For example, "white" generally refers to people of European descent who do not have Hispanic descent, even though most Hispanics probably do have European ancestry. I do recall this being discussed after the 2020 census data was released, but I'd have to do the digging to find the discussion. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:34, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate template arguments

edit

Hello, I noticed that majority of the articles in Category:Articles using duplicate arguments in template calls appear to be due to your recent edits. Specifically, you added the parameter "|2020=x" to the US Census population template even though the same parameter was already present, which resulted in duplicate arguments. – Subway 09:15, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing this out! Those articles had a formatting issue with the population table, which caused an edge case my bot for that task didn't handle. I have fixed it and am running a different script to fix the existing pages. CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 13:08, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Formatting of US Census population template

edit

This edit is one of many with an edit summary stating "Normalize US Census population table formatting". The placement of the parameter in the US Census population template had been part of a deliberate effort to make it easier for editors to see that there is a footnote regarding changes in the land area of the municipality since the previous census. As rendered on the page, the asterisk in the note parameter appears next to the data for the designated year. I'm not sure how your multiple edits "normalize" anything. If anything, it makes it more confusing for a future editor to understand what these parameters are doing in the middle of the data.

How do these mass changes improv any of these articles, as they render exactly the same and make it harder for an editor to understand the data in the table? Am I missing something? Alansohn (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Census data edits on U.S. geographic articles

edit

Hey @CyrusTheMediocre! I've noticed your edits to a lot of U.S. geographic articles; it looks like you might be running a bot on your account to update U.S. census data(?) on these articles. If so, I wanted to let you know that under the bot policy, it'd probably be a good idea to set up a separate bot account and get the task approved at WP:BRFA. That's usually a requirement for running tasks like these onwiki; if there's not already a discussion creating a consensus for the task, by the way, you'll probably want to start there. Thanks, and please let me know if you have any questions! Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 17:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Cyrus – echoing everything Staraction said, you seem to currently be running multiple unauthorized mainspace bot tasks on your main account, which is something the community doesn't allow. For the moment, I've blocked your account just to stop the tasks from running, but I'm happy to unblock whenever you come back and respond that you've turned off the bot. I don't think you'll have much of an issue gaining consensus or going through BAG, but one of the reasons we require this is so that if something goes wrong (like it seems to have a couple of times, looking over your talk), admins don't have to block your main account to stop the task. Thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:59, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, my bad. I didn't realize that there was more of a process than just setting up an api connection and running the bot. I will go ahead and do it properly per WP:BRFA. I would appreciate it if you could unblock my account. Thanks! CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 00:49, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
done :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:47, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mabton, Washington, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 23:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Removal of sections

edit

The removal of the crime sections in Everett, Washington and Lynnwood, Washington has been reverted. Please make sure to discuss major section removals on the talk page and gain consensus first. The census updates are appreciated, but they need to be done in separate articles to make decoupling changes easier. SounderBruce 05:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

That was a mistake on the part of my bot. They should have been moved to their own H2 section (==Crime==), but instead they got deleted. I'll be careful to fix that CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 07:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please do not remove relevant statistics as was done at Edmonds, Washington. For good and featured articles, the wording was carefully selected after reviews, and should remain with statistics updated rather than removed for a less refined prose template. SounderBruce 04:12, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I removed income data from 2012 that I don't believe would be very meaningful to a current reader because of inflation. Is there established precedent for preserving such data? CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 04:41, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
It's better to find an updated equivalent or tag with {{needs update}} and let another editor handle it. If there's been no response for a while, then removal is fine. SounderBruce 04:50, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay, thanks for the guidance. I am planning to add 2024 ACS data (the most recent year available) once my bot access is added, but for now I'll avoid deleting that sort of data. CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 04:56, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Population estimate arrows

edit

It appears several of your edits on Texas county articles, and possibly articles elsewhere, carelessly inserted increase/decrease arrow templates for population estimate comparisons inside the citations' {{cite web}} calls when those calls spanned multiple lines, thereby breaking the template calls and hiding the arrows in the references section instead of displaying them in the actual population history table. Two examples are this fix I had to make on Gray County, Texas, and this example (live as of this post). Reading the posts above, I imagine they were automated edits, explaining the carelessness. Please fix them. -happy5214 22:47, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I had a follow-up script that was going to fix all of those, but they blocked my account in the middle of it CyrusTheBot (talk) 08:31, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Census data edits

edit

Taking one demographic statistic from many in the article and turn the data into a table has no real meaning to the page at all, except maybe to make it busier looking or to satisfy the editor in some manner. Please stop these needless addendums. ~2026-12942-56 (talk) 01:14, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for expressing your concern. The reason that the race data is put into a table is because of all the data, it is the only section that properly fits a tabular format. Does it make sense to display median age or percent urban vs rural as a table? Putting the race data in a table was very common on many pages well before I started making these edits. CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

These articles are a meant to be a few simple paragraphs on demographics, not the U.S. Census data. Please leave the original format. To reiterate, placing a table in a paragraph in order to replace the text that states the same statistics, is highly moot.  Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-13215-55 (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pretty much all the information in the demographics paragraphs for all US counties and municipalities come from the US Census. The information that I'm adding is consistent with what many such articles include, not just in their "2020 demographics" sections, but also in "2010 demographics" and even "2000 demographics". CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 05:16, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

March 2026

edit

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to St. Simons, Georgia, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 14:02, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Systematic removal of sources for census data

edit

This edit to the article for Oak Valley, New Jersey, is one of what could be hundreds of edits that added data from the 2020 census while removing the source for the 2010 census data. Why would you make these edits without reviewing to see that a source was being deleted? Given the number and speed of the edits, it appears that you are using an automated tool, but regardless of the method you are expected to check each edit for accuracy. How can you not have seen that a trail of hundreds of broken references was being created? Please be far more careful in the future and please exercise far more judgment before making mass edits like these. Alansohn (talk) 02:58, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

March 2026

edit

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you.  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 08:27, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

(talk page watcher) @Sumanuil: I edit many of the same articles as CyrusTheMediocre. Which particular edit are your referring to? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

They took the first space out of a bunch of map file names (for example, turning "Santa Fe County New Mexico Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Cundiyo Highlighted.svg" into "SantaFe County New Mexico Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Cundiyo Highlighted.svg"). Which also has nothing to do with the census data updates in their edit summaries. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 21:43, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Username

edit

You have one of the top 100 usernames on Wikipedia right now. I’m jealous! Bigturtle (talk) 00:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Lutz, Florida

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lutz, Florida, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:09, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Herkimer County, New York

edit

@CyrusTheMediocre: can you take a look at the result of this edit and fix it? Thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:29, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just fixed it. Thank you CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 02:50, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

El Monte, california

edit

i have noticed the artical you edited presently, El Monte california seems to need a ranking. it has not been updated in a while.... can you help me

the goat with a horn on his head The goat with a horn on his head (talk) 01:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad to try to help, can you clarify what you mean by a ranking? CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 02:40, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I meant C class like from the WikiProject content quality grading. The article could use some improvements, like the politics, economy, Transportation, health services, and media have very short sections, like a start article. I was hoping if you can spend some of your time making this a good article, its so close. thank you The goat with a horn on his head (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

James Toltz Lawsuit and Editor Conduct

edit

Evidence of Systematic Deletion

edit

Information regarding the ongoing class-action lawsuit against former Peabody physical education teacher James Toltz (Middlesex Superior Court Case No: 2277CV00755) is being repeatedly removed from this page. This lawsuit involves nearly 50 plaintiffs and is a matter of significant public record and local historical impact.

Misuse of BLP Policy to Protect a Subject

edit

An editor has been performing "3-minute deletes" to suppress these facts. While Wikipedia's Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) policy is important, it cannot be used as a shield to "protect" individuals from the inclusion of well-documented, high-profile legal proceedings reported by major news outlets like The Boston Globe and The Salem News.

Violation of Neutral Point of View (NPOV)

edit

The continuous removal of this section without engaging in discussion constitutes whitewashing and a violation of the Neutral Point of View policy. I am requesting that the history of the Toltz lawsuit—specifically the allegations of systemic abuse from 1969 to 1996 and the upcoming 2027 trial—remain in the "History" or "Legal Issues" section of the Peabody page to ensure the encyclopedia's accuracy and integrity.

i saw you did the last edit in peabody mass this data will never stick

I have no idea what you're talking about. My only edit to Peabody, Massachusetts was adding updated census data. I haven't had any involvement with adding, removing, or modifying content related to the lawsuit in question. CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 04:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

CyrusTheMediocre ( A barnstar for you! )

edit
The Original Barnstar
Great job in Wikipedia 'Thank you! That is a very kind gesture, often associated with the Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar awarded for going the extra mile 16th of April in the year 2026 (UTC)

Garden City, New York Stats

edit

Hi! I just saw your edit at Garden City, New York and overall, I liked your changes in terms of phrasing and structure. However, you did cut out some of the race and ethnicity stats, which are repeated in a table but not in writing. You might know a bit more about this topic than me, and I'm not going to revert such a largely well done edit, but I was wondering if there was a reason for this. Love the username by the way :) EndTheWikiEditor (talk) 01:49, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for reaching out. A bunch of the data that was removed was actually un-cited 2000-era data that was presented as being from 2020. What happens sometimes is that someone at some point updated the population from the 2000 value to a more recent year, updated the citation, and updated the year form "2000" to "2020", but doesn't update the rest of the data. So you end up with un-cited, old data that looks like it is current. CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 02:10, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Awesome, good fix! EndTheWikiEditor (talk) 04:10, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks :) CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 04:15, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
edit

As in this edit for Paramus, New Jersey, are the census API links supposed to bring up a page? All I get is a white screen with a formatted query and I'm not sure what I'm seeing. Thanks for all the edits, but I'm trying to verify the sources of the data and I'm not sure how to match it up. Alansohn (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good point, I think the query params in the census api urls may have gotten dropped in some cases when I made the updates. I'll fix that CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 13:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I just checked on that particular article and I actually am able to see the data. The api gives raw data, not something like census fact finder CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 13:08, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
If you want to understand what each field means, you can use this table:
PL / Redistricting data:
https://api.census.gov/data/2020/dec/pl/variables.html
DP / Demographic Profile, including DP1:
https://api.census.gov/data/2020/dec/dp/variables.html
DHC / Demographic and Housing Characteristics:
https://api.census.gov/data/2020/dec/dhc/variables.html CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 13:19, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the details. In the olden days, 2010 census and before, you could get a simple web page with a static URL that had census data for a single place. It's much more complicated now, but I want to be sure that I can match the source to the data. How are you extracting the data for each community and formatting it into prose with sources. Alansohn (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Glad I could help. To move faster I use the assistance of a Python script that is paired with the census API which helps me generate the basic paragraphs populated with the proper data CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 22:10, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

South River 2020 census information

edit

I just wanted to thank you for improving the article! I added that information last month because there was no 2020 data section, and I think you improved it quite a bit! That was one of my first edits, and you corrected my mistake about households with people under 18, as well as reorganized it. Thank you again, and keep up the good work! Jbrill05 (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

No problem, thank you so much for the encouragement! CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carlisle, Arkansas
added a link pointing to Latino
Jefferson, Iowa
added a link pointing to Latino

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, CyrusTheMediocre, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Bryce M (talk) 12:14, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Terribly sorry for the late welcome. Thanks for editing the Erwin, NC page. Bryce M (talk) 12:14, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Conshohocken, Pennsylvania

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bot-like editing

edit

You were blocked for running an unauthorised bot in February. You've filed a BRFA that is yet to be approved, and yet you're running an even larger script, still without requesting approval. Especially with erratic sentences such as "0.0% of residents lived in urban areas, while 100.0% lived in rural areas." Please stop the script immediately. DatGuyTalkContribs 13:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Automated editing in census-designated place articles. DatGuyTalkContribs 15:35, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Stormsnsnow. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Erwin, North Carolina have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Bot editing per WP:AIV Bryce M (talk) 15:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Cimarron, Kansas

edit

Per Cimarron, Kansas and other communitiies, you need to fix your section levels. "Households and housing", "Education", "Income and poverty" shouldn't be at the same level as "2020 census" and "2010 census". You need to go back through your past edits and fix these issues. • SbmeirowTalk08:03, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Is there any official documentation you can point to that supports this? The figures in those sections are from off-decade ACS estimates, not from actual census results. So it would be incorrect to put them beneath a "2020 Census" heading. CyrusTheMediocre (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply