Coquimbo58

Welcome!

Hello, Coquimbo58, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to List of micronations. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Balkywrest (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Surveyor Germán Barbato Municipal Planetarium moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Surveyor Germán Barbato Municipal Planetarium, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:58, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Surveyor Germán Barbato Municipal Planetarium concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Surveyor Germán Barbato Municipal Planetarium, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Massacre of Salsipuedes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Massacre of Salsipuedes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Surveyor Germán Barbato Municipal Planetarium

Hello, Coquimbo58. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Surveyor Germán Barbato Municipal Planetarium".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I saw this up for deletion and thought it was notable, so I have accepted it for you. I've moved it to Planetario de Montevideo, as that appears to be the most common modern name. Thanks for contributing this interesting article! Espresso Addict (talk) 10:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Massacre of Salsipuedes has been accepted

Massacre of Salsipuedes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charrúa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaná. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Uruguayan cuisine into List of pizza varieties by country. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Universal Constructivism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 19:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Carlos Gardel, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

'Uruguayan'

...is a proper adjective, so the 'U' is capitalised. JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 19:19, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Coquimbo58, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 10:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Coquimbo58. Thank you for your work on Uruguayan Whale and Dolphin Sanctuary. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good article. I think you can move this to just "Whale and Dolphin Sanctuary".

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Your additions to Electricity sector in Uruguay contained a significant number of grammatical and punctuation errors. I'm working on fixing the broken citation and other issues, but please be more mindful of things like run-on sentences in the future. Be sure you have reviewed the info linked below. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Electricity sector in Uruguay, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Electricity sector in Uruguay, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

New issue: you need to write in your own words. Some of your text was taken verbatim from this document. I have removed your changes for the time being.

Please review the copyright information attached below. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I've never seen that document before. But seeing it's from 2007 and knowing the article's information was severely outdated I suspect that was the source used by a previous editor. I'd suggest you check page history and send this warning to the correct user. Coquimbo58 (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

You are quite right - my apologies. When I viewed your recent additions to the page, the previously-existing text (the copyright issue) had been shifted to a new spot in the viewing window, making it look as if it had been added in your edits. I had recently been looking into other copyright violations, and jumped the gun in this case.

I'll dig further into the page history at some point, to see who in fact added that verbatim text. In the meantime, I'm going to remove the copyright warning from below this message, as it clearly doesn't apply. Thank you, and again, my apologies. Jessicapierce (talk) 21:58, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Carlos Gardel, you may be blocked from editing. Don't represent false claims as mainstream. Binksternet (talk) 02:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

I did not add any personal analysis nor commentary. It seems that you are the one violating Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, if you continue to do so you may be blocked from editing. Don't represent your personal analysis as mainstream. Coquimbo58 (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Blocking me for upholding the best sourcing... that would be something to see.

Basically you have been taught a falsehood. The things you heard and read were wrong. Uruguay is not Gardel's birthplace, no matter how much conjecture and false proof is published. The birth and baptismal records in Toulouse are definitive. Everything else is fake. Binksternet (talk) 04:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Gardel's document such as his passport are available, clear and definitive. Wikipedia is no place for conspirative theories about false identities. Coquimbo58 (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

At some point in the 1970s and early 1980s there was enough confusion created by the Uruguayan birth claims that tango historian Simon Collier was moved to publish the book, The life, music & times of Carlos Gardel in 1986. Collier cleared up the confusion with careful and methodical research documenting the Toulouse birth as true. Page 5 of his book is cited in the Wikipedia page. The same conclusion was reached by Universidad Austral de Chile professor Luis Bocaz, another scholar of tango. Bocaz published his 1986 conclusion in UNESCO's journal, titled "Tango Time", in which he says the Toulouse birth certificate "finally put an end to the arguments." So by 1986 the question was solved. Gardel was French, and all the Uruguayan "evidence" was fake. Binksternet (talk) 15:05, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Reinforced brick masonry

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Reinforced brick masonry, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Waste Heat

Hey - I saw that you deleted the section on air conditioners and heat pumps from the waste heat page. I think there's a misunderstanding. Yes, a heat pump moves heat energy as part of it's functioning but the heat that is radiated out of a building is waste heat. I agree that it's not a byproduct in the way that heat from an incandescent light is a byproduct. But it is waste in the sense that thermal energy is being expelled into the environment. It's heat that doesn't have a use that could theoretically be recovered for some other purpose. So I think it still counts as a source of waste heat.

I'm going to start a section on the talk page to get comments. If I've misunderstood your edit or you disagree with my view point, please discuss. I don't want to start an edit war, especially since I think you have hit on a valid point that might need to be captured some other way. RedactedSagan (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2026 (UTC)