Conyo14

Thank you for your AFD comments

		The Original Barnstar
		I am happy that you provided a great reasoning for deletion at WP:Articles for deletion/Hughes Bowl, in that the coverage is too trivial and thus fails GNG. I also appreciate your suggestion of a future Hughes family article once less trivial coverage can be found. I had opened the AFD on my own article in the first place to get quality comments like yours on record, so your comments there are well-appreciated! — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 20:13, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

By the way, would coverage on the Hughes brothers early-life interactions with each other, and their parents' attendance/reactions to their games, count as significant coverage for a hypothetical Hughes family article? — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 20:15, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Hughes family continued

Would information in this article be significant coverage for a hypothetical Hughes family (ice hockey) article? Information from this article includes:

• "In many ways, Ellen was her boys' first coach. [...] She taught all three sons to skate, laying the foundation for what would become the most crucial element of their game, just as it was hers."
• "When Jim transitioned to a role as director of player development for the Maple Leafs, he had more time to attend the boys' practices and games, watch games with them on TV or study clips the Leafs coaches were showing their pro players."

etc.

I also found this article about the family's religious background (that it is a mixed Catholic/Jewish household) but I need confirmation on whether religious background is significant information for GNG purposes. This specific fact is already documented on Jack Hughes. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 21:57, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Of the sources you provided, I would say that the ESPN one is pretty good. Definitely not good for a Hughes Bowl article. However, I worry that having a family article breaks another policy we have. Typically, individual articles are preferred for each family member. The way they break could be the use of sources such as these. How you do that article is up to you, but I would recommend creating a draft first. Conyo14 (talk) 22:26, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

100% the Hughes Bowl article (about the 3 games themselves) is to be deleted due to the coverage in sources being too trivial to meet GNG. I'll G7 it when it devolves into too much "WP:FANCRUFT" citations.

I am creating Draft:Hughes family (ice hockey). The main focus of a family article would be the family members' interactions with each other, as well as common things family members did together that would be redundant when repeated three or four times on the pages of each family member. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 22:36, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Canucks–Flames rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canucks–Flames rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canucks–Flames rivalry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Servite et contribuere (talk) 13:32, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Oilers-Ducks series

Are you sure it's OK to put down the Oilers-Ducks series before the Oilers game has ended? It only feels right to wait out of procedure. We generally don't tend to call things early. Mk8mlyb (talk) 03:32, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Moot point Conyo14 (talk) 03:39, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

You mean the game, right? Mk8mlyb (talk) 03:42, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes. I would say that when it gets to the playoff games, yeah wait until it's over. Those were regular season games. Conyo14 (talk) 04:34, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Well, the season's just about over. You ready for the playoffs? Mk8mlyb (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

@Mk8mlyb Yeah, Deadman137 might be able to join at some point during the 1st round. I'm hoping you can assist with game recaps as I work on the series recaps. Let's make this an easier year! Conyo14 (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Here's to a great year. Personally, the first round and second round are my favorite parts because of the sheer number of games, both possible and actually played. In particular, I'm looking forward to the Sabres beating the Bruins. As usual, I'm hoping for a lot of overtime games across the board. Mk8mlyb (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

@Mk8mlyb Deadman137 has indeed returned. We should be able to handle most things together. If you have something to contribute, I suggest waiting after today's results to see what you can do. Series recaps are not completed until the end of the series though. Conyo14 (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

You know, it's kind of hard to get any edits in when other people keep beating you to the punch. Mk8mlyb (talk) 03:31, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. You'll figure something out. I know it! Conyo14 (talk) 04:02, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

@Conyo14: Did you change my series recap of the Hurricanes–Senators series? What parts did you not like about it? Mk8mlyb (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes. I thought yours was mostly fine. Just lowered the amount of story. We really want to just have a single sentence most of the time. Game 2 being the exception. My main gripe is there were 0 citations. So, it's just easier for me to cut and paste something I've been working on all week. Apologies if I overtook your work. You may use your sandbox and show me what you've written and I can edit it slightly if you'd like. Conyo14 (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, I should have thought of using that more. Thanks. Much appreciate your contributions to the article. Mk8mlyb (talk) 00:31, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

2026 playoffs

It's time for some rare trivia that could be added to the article. I did some digging and the Montreal/Tampa series is the only time in the 16+ playoff team era that former finalists since 1980 have faced each other in the opening round. Obviously the original six era has to be excluded as most series between those teams is a possible Final rematch from some previous year. Deadman137 (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

I think that's a little too rare to add on to this. Conyo14 (talk) 01:05, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

That and I don't have a citation for it. We do have a Mastergerwe97 sock using the account NeatLife474. Deadman137 (talk) 02:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Maybe? Seems mostly harmless. Conyo14 (talk) 02:59, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Are you sure? Accusing accounts of being sockpuppets is no funny matter. Mk8mlyb (talk) 22:52, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm not disagreeing, but I also don't have the tools to accuse someone. That being said, I know Deadman137 wouldn't pursue further Conyo14 (talk) 02:41, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

I'll address the previous conversation at a later time, right now it's time to focus on content. With that in mind, Jordan Martinook became the fifth player in Stanley Cup playoff history to receive a penalty shot in overtime (strangely all of them have missed) and he is the only player to miss a penalty shot in the playoffs in overtime and then later score the eventual game winning goal. Here is the main link for the penalty shot in overtime claim. The latter part doesn't have to be added to the series summary, though it can be verified through the corresponding game summaries. Deadman137 (talk) 06:23, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

That I am actually adding due to the strange nature of how he got that penalty shot. I shall gladly take the link as well. Conyo14 (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Calgary Flames

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 30 June 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2026, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 2026. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Wehwalt (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Sabres–Bruins edits

Don't know if you noticed earlier, but there were edits made by ~2026-25410-90 of the Sabres–Bruins series section. Those edits are from me. I did not have access to my account at the time, so I had to make do with an anonymous account. Do you have any problems with this, or do you not care? Mk8mlyb (talk) 00:26, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

I was wondering that, but all good. Conyo14 (talk) 02:45, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Alright. Also, I was wondering if we could try something unique for tomorrow. You think we should split up the work on the various games? You know, like, assign certain areas or tasks to certain people, such as me doing the goals for the games and you finding the NHL recap links or goalie stats? Or we could split it up per game, such as me doing the Flyers-Penguins game and you doing the Golden Knights-Mammoth game? And then when it's time for the series recaps, we can split that up in similar ways too, like me doing one series recap and you doing another, and then Deadman137 doing another. Now, if you don't want to do that, that's totally fine, but I think it's something we should consider. Mk8mlyb (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

I think Deadman137 has returned to his personal life temporarily. He will be called if necessary. As for tomorrow's games, I should be available for the series recaps (if necessary). As for stats, please update them as close to the other ones as possible. The links were also incorrect in some areas. It might be good to check if the links stay active or go to 404s. Conyo14 (talk) 03:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

So you want me to do the stats and links, while you do the series recaps. Got it. I can handle that. Either way, I've got to go to sleep around now, so see you tomorrow. Mk8mlyb (talk) 03:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

@Mk8mlyb good night, and good luck Conyo14 (talk) 04:02, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

All right, I'm back. We doing the same thing as before--I get goals and links, you do series recaps? If there's anything else you would like me to do, just let me know. Mk8mlyb (talk) 23:52, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't think so. NeatLife might get to the stats first, so watch out. Conyo14 (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

@Mk8mlyb please wait until the end of the game to place in the stats. The reason is due to the league's inability to assign assists, goals, and saves at the proper time. Conyo14 (talk) 02:04, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

I hate how he gets ahead of me on that stuff. But fine. Mk8mlyb (talk) 02:06, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Do it in your sandbox first, then prepare like 10 seconds prior to the end. Only undo if a goal is scored. Conyo14 (talk) 02:11, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

I have just noticed that all eight series in the first round have had a game go into overtime. How often does that happen, and is it special enough to warrant a mention? Mk8mlyb (talk) 18:24, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Happens pretty frequently. What's less frequent is every series in the playoffs has an overtime goal. Conyo14 (talk) 21:11, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

When's the last time that happened? If at all? Mk8mlyb (talk) 00:38, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

2013 Conyo14 (talk) 02:54, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2026 Stanley Cup playoffs

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Stanley Cup playoffs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of New York Rangers is under review

Your good article nomination of the article New York Rangers is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kivi36 -- Kivi36 (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of New York Rangers has passed

Your good article nomination of the article New York Rangers has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kivi36 -- Kivi36 (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 in ice hockey, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peoria Rivermen was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

Hello Conyo14,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)