Kivi36

Kivi36

This user is a participant in
WikiProject Ice Hockey.

This user is of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.

This user plays Ultimate frisbee.

This user is a Songwriter

This user is a participant in WikiProject Articles for creation. You can help!

page What's gooooood. I'm a hockey fan that loves the New York Rangers and following the news. I also love listening to music, primarly hip hop.

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! EggRoll97 ^(talk) 08:44, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Caleb Jones (ice hockey)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Caleb Jones (ice hockey), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use your sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. MossOnALog^Talk 18:46, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out. It was simply a mistake. I copy and pasted the wrong thing. Kivi36 (talk) 18:52, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottawa 67's, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luca Pinelli was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Reliable sources for ice hockey

Please read WP:RS before continuing to add more sources. You added StatMuse.com as a source at Cale Makar (for example, this link). I must note that it was discussed more than once in the past and it was determined that StatMuse.com is not a reliable source. You are supposed to support your claims by looking at websites like NHL, ESPN, Sportsnet, TSN, The Hockey News or similar that are reliable. – sbaio 20:55, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

I've updated the page. Thanks for your help. Kivi36 (talk) 20:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

{{Ping|Sbaio}} Kivi36 (talk) 20:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@Kivi36 Seconding this for transactions. HockeyPatrol is not a reliable source for our standards. The Kip ^(contribs) 17:53, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

{{Ping|The Kip}} I was using it as a place holder Kivi36 (talk) 17:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Minnesota wild prospects

A tag has been placed on Category:Minnesota wild prospects indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Re: This diff

Player categories only go in when a player has played a game for a team; Dexheimer gets the Category:Iowa Wild players cat because he played two games for Iowa, but not the Category:Minnesota Wild players one because he hasn't played any games for Minnesota. The Kip ^(contribs) 17:28, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

okay thanks Kivi36 (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

New York Rangers

Hello there. I'm dropping by because I watchlist WP:Good article nominations, and I happened to notice that the review for the above article was begun and completed in roughly twenty minutes, which seemed surprising. Looking at the review page, I see a rubber stamped pass with the only critical comment being To make it go above and beyond, i'd make sure we cite everything possible. This seems to fall short of what is expected of a complete GA review. Even if you didn't find a single actionable item that could be improved in this 6,600-word article (which, to be fair to the nominator Conyo14, this does seem to be a very well written article), per WP:GANI#R3 there at least needs to be evidence that a spot check of the sources was performed: This must include a spot-check of a sample of the sources in the article to verify that each source supports the text in the article that it covers, and that no copyrighted material has been added to the article from the source. I appreciate your willingness to perform reviews, and I'm not trying to dampen your enthusiasm, but I'd recommend giving the reviewing instructions a thorough read, taking a look through some completed GA reviews, and perhaps requesting a mentor before taking on another review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 23:03, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Kivi36 (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2025–26 New York Rangers season has failed

Your good article nomination of the article 2025–26 New York Rangers season has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kline -- Kline (talk) 02:01, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Christoffer Sedoff

The page Christoffer Sedoff has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:41, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Quite confused @Liz Kivi36 (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christoffer Sedoff has been accepted

Christoffer Sedoff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Maxim Barbashev when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:51, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

@Zackmann08, Thank you so much for catching my error! I am really not sure how I missed that! I normally do click the preview button but I guess I glossed voer it. My apologies! Thank you so much though! Kivi36 (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

We've all been there! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:49, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

LLM use

Hello and thank you for your recent contributions. However, it appears like you may be using the help of LLM tools during the creation of these articles. Please stop. This is no longer allowed on Wikipedia. Thank you, JTtheOG (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Hey there! I was under the impression LLMs are allowed to be used durign copyediting. That being said, the amount I used it on some of the pages was probably more than the alloewd amount. I will refreain from using it to this extent in the future. Thank you! Kivi36 (talk) 18:33, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes, WP:LLM allows the use of LLM tools for basic copyediting, but it's pretty clear from the language used in the articles that LLM tools are being used to generate text, which as you pointed out, goes beyond what is allowed. Thank you, JTtheOG (talk) 19:06, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! Kivi36 (talk) 19:09, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Aspinall (ice hockey) has been accepted

Nathan Aspinall (ice hockey), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Please slow down when editing.

I know, Larkin's trade request is big news and I understand wanting to be the one to break the news on Wikipedia. But please, don't hurry so much that you put it in the wrong section. I should not have to move that NHL-career information from "International play" to "Playing career". mftp dan ^oops 20:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

My apologies. I do appreciate you pointing out my error. That being said, I feel as though there could have been a more respectful way to put it. I know there's a whole don't bite the newbie thing and I'm not fully a newbie, but I'm still figuring my way out around these parts. Either way, I feel everybody should deserve respect and the last line of that message just felt unnecessarily snarky and rude. @MFTP Dan Kivi36 (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

I usually take pretty good care not to. I apologize, although I'm not sure what I said wrong. I see you're genuinely putting in effort to learn, which is more than many people who edit our project if I'm frank. Keep it up, you'll get there, but you don't need to hurry. Haste makes waste(d effort). mftp dan ^oops 20:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Cheers man! Have a great day and enjoy your summer Kivi36 (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

@Kivi36 going to piggy-back off this - same goes for the Laviolette hiring. We’re not in a rush to update the article, it’s best to wait until the hiring is officially announced just in case it somehow falls through (see WP:SPORTSTRANS). Wikipedia doesn’t have to be immediately up to date. The Kip ^(contribs) 00:49, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

@The KipThanks! I did add the do not change anything banner til hiring goes through. The addition I made was a potential thing and talked about how they might hire that way it still sticks if the hiring slips Kivi36 (talk) 17:13, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brody Lamb

The article Brody Lamb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

page created using AI, only significantly edited by creator, violation of WP:NEWLLM

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. DraconicDark (talk) 20:29, 8 June 2026 (UTC)